Shew is
a unique biblical word used in the King James Version (KJV) of
the Bible also called the Holy
Bible: seventh Bible:
a more
exact translation: one made
better
from six good in the manner that God saw only "good" x 6, and "very good" 7th time in Genesis 1;
Not "both good and evil" ends
badly.
The 7th
Bible (Holy Bible) is
a 'more exact translation' that is neither Roman
Catholic nor Protestant in the same manner us-ward is neither of them vs them who
oppose themselves.
Thereby the shew in a KJV Holy Bible (7th Bible) is better (of
good/better) to use for
allegoric Bible study to solve the allegoric "mystery of God"
contained
therein which uses unique biblical words like shew and ye. So ye should also not
be changed to you since ye
and you are both used in
the KJV Bible, and often in the same
verse to denote an allegoric before/after compare-i-son, a
comparative teaching comparing laws vs grace
as if
"comparing spiritual things
with spiritual", to rightly divide
the word of truth about law
<--vs--> grace
to know "the
truth" that makes you free: "grace is sufficient". For by comparing contrary things
we replace erroneous beliefs
with k-now.
When we know, then we no longer believe.
When reconciled, we no longer require a mediator.
When we establish the
heart with grace only, the truth thereof, then all laws (lies) begin to vanish.
Grace is sufficient, but only when Law is
allowed to be dead testator
so Grace may be of "force" to bring eternal life
of eternal salvation unto all "the
kingdom of God is within you",
so that none perish by pure
grace (2Peter 3:9) rather than all perish by using of laws (Colossians
2:20-22). So the allegoric
comparison of the shew of
laws vs
grace is also as if comparing extinction vs salvation:
Allegoric Example: Gandhi: the choice is non-violence or non-existence
(grace or law)
Allegoric Example: Shakespeare:
to be or not to be, that is the question
(grace or law)
Bible Example: Jesus Christ: He that is not with me is against me (with = grace or against =
law)
JC said God said: he that gathereth not with me scattereth
abroad (gather = grace; scatter = law)
Sadly shew is not even
used at all in
the New King James Version
which replaces shew with show; Nor is shew
used in any of many modern perversions of
the Holy Bible (7th Bible: one made
better from six good to make God's holy
truth more known, per
guidelines
given Translators
of the Bible). The truth to be made more known is grace is
sufficient, but only when law is flushed as dung, thereby establishing the
heart with grace only; Since a heart not established with grace will
defile (condemn)
a man with his own mouth. Eg: Thine
own mouth condemneth thee, and not I: Job 15:6. The truth (grace
is sufficient) is what makes us free, but only when lies(laws) are
flushed as dung; For a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump; like a
little law(lie) makes grace(truth) no more grace(truth), and a little
death makes life no more eternal, and a little cancer kills the whole
body if not all removed in time. So the operation of God
is about removing all the cancer us law in time.
Hence no mention
of law at all in the
end (of law) we're told to endure unto to be saved (only) by grace
(only), instead of being both saved (graced) and destroyed (lawed)
after like Exodus folk saved
out of Egypt, as noted for us in Jude 1:5. All such were saved, but
also destroyed afterward;
The point being grace + law is as blessed + cursed = accursed, and as
life + death = a dead end. For law
(worketh wrath) added to grace (is sufficient) makes grace "no more
grace",
as death added to eternal life makes life no more eternal, but rather
life +
death = dead end. Example: Galatians 5:4 If you
are justified by law (of grace + law), you are
humpty dumpty fallen from (pure) grace and eternal life thereof above
to (impure) grace + law = life + death below; and then Christ (is the
end of the law:
Romans 10:4) is of "no effect" to "you" (of ye/you). End Result: not suffered to continue by reason of death
(Hebrews 7:23); Law being source
of sin: Romans 5:13 and strength of sin's death
sting: 1Corinthians 15:56, thereby
ministration of death:
2Corinthians 3:7. So if law is not done away, taken away, put away as the put off,
abolished, blotted out to the point
of vanish, then
such ministration of death
will surely kill you, all the kingdom of God within you. Selah.
Strong's Concordance Meaning of Shew in the Hebrew and Greek
Shew
in Hebrew OT is // har // ra'ah // raw-aw' // Strong's Bible
Concordance #07200
It's an action verb used 1313 times in the OT with
several different meanings: see 879,
look 104, behold 83, shew 68, appear 66, consider
22, seer 12, spy 6, respect 5,
perceive 5, provide 4, regard 4, enjoy 4, lo 3,
foreseeth 2, heed 2, misc 74
1) to see, look at, inspect, perceive, consider
1a) (Qal)
1a1) to see
1a2) to see, perceive
1a3) to see, have vision
1a4) to look at, see, regard, look after, see after,
learn
about, observe, watch, look upon, look out, find out
1a5) to see, observe, consider, look at, give
attention to, discern, distinguish
1a6) to look at, gaze at
1b) (Niphal)
1b1) to appear, present oneself
1b2) to be seen
1b3) to be visible
1c) (Pual) to be seen
1d) (Hiphil)
1d1) to cause to see, show
1d2) to cause to look intently at, behold, cause to
gaze at
1e) (Hophal)
1e1) to be caused to see, be shown
1e2) to be exhibited to
1f) (Hithpael) to look at each other, face
Shew in Greek NT is //
deiknuw // deiknuo // dike-noo'-o //
Strong's # 1166
a prolonged form of a primary of the same meaning;
TDNT - 2:25,*;
also an action verb used 31 times, meaning show, but
also much more
than show
1) to show, expose to the eyes
2) metaphor (allegory: allegoric mystery)
2a) to give evidence or proof of a thing
2b) to show by words or teach by comparison
Allegorically shew
is
plural
of show, in the manner 'elohiym (Gods) is plural of 'elowahh (God)
in Hebrew. But sadly not even the Jewish Bible uses shew. The unique
biblical word shew denotes a
plural and comparative teaching is being used to help us get it:
understanding, to understand a
thing
is better understood by comparison to what it is not: the contrary part
(law) being "added" for shew. Eg: what
is grace, compared to what it's not: law. Eg: what is mercy, compared
to what it's not: sacrifice. Eg: what is peace, compared to what it's
not: confusion. So it is written: God
is not [the author] of
confusion, but of peace; of such Grace --> Mercy --> Peace
(best three wishes). Confusion results from the opposite (other wise):
Confusion <-- Sacrifice <-- Law. So, even in the sanctuary of the
tabernacle we find the Menorah Candlesticks <-- opposite --> the ShewBread; And shewbread is piled in two heaps, to denote a shew (allegoric
comparative teaching) is occuring.
John 1:17
Law vs Grace shewn as Lie vs Truth
The law (lie) was given by Moses, [but]
grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.
The
Law, given by Moses, is thereby a counter part in the shew; And
notably
a
"contrary part" when
parts are being shewn instead
of the whole. For part-ialtiy is not
perfect-ion; And God our Father is perfect, as ye(do err) are told to
be in Matthew 5:48. Furthermore perfect = merciful when connecting
Matthew 5:48's be ye perfect
with Luke 6:36's be ye therefore
merciful. So as 1Corinthians 13 notes: when perfect-ion
comes, then part-iality
is done away, even your part
of their part vs your part; Since the allness of God
isn't part-ial, notably neither of the parts that make and take
sides to have war. Rather it's one whole that's not
partial, true peace
that's not confusion.
The biblical word shew,
being allegory and
mystery: allegoric mystery, denotes comparative teaching: comparing
spiritual things with spiritual (comparing laws with grace)
after
comparing
natural law(good) and spiritual law(better).
So shew (plural of show) is firstly about the better of two things
good/better: Twain Shew:
Eg: the body of "Christ" of "through Jesus-->Christ"; Lastly
about best of three things
good/better/best: God
Shew: Eg: be reconciled (through Jesus-->Christ)-->to
God. So firstly the
journey is through Jesus-->Christ; lastly the destination is through
Christ-->God-ward; For God is
not a man that he should lie (law), neither Son of man that he should repent
(change).
Shew: has three stages to get to true
conversion (reconciled to God)
So,
firstly put off two
Sons Jesus to put on Christ, then
put off Christ to put on God is not a man.
So Paul's
conversion a three stage scenario: (Terrorist
Saul-->Wretched
Paul)-->The
Apostle Paul: finally "his witness unto all men", and "his angel"
plays the last trump in every Pauline Epistle, especially Hebrews (a mini bible itself)
and Revelation (ends the Holy
Bible containing Old & New Testaments).
Since every good mystery has revelations to it
revealed near the end, and every good mystery
has twists to it, especially near the end, the God shew (meatier
portion) reveals what's best
for all of three things is neither of two things: Eg: no more a servant
is neither of two
servants vs servants; And be no more
children is neither of two children vs
children. Hence we find a more
excellent way is neither broad nor narrow minded. So shew is about
progression: (good -->
better) --> best. For what's good and better are only good and
better
for some,
but what's best
is notably best for all; And what's best for all is not faulty
fault-finding imperfect accusational condemnational killer law. Rather
what is best and for all is pure merciful grace multiplies true peace world wide
(globe-ally).
Examples of comparative teaching in a
progressive God shew:
What is
grace
(worketh merciful peace) compared to what it is
not: law (worketh wrath
= not
peaceful).
What is perfect love
(love perfected)
compared
to what it's not: fear
(hath torment = vexation:
frustration). What is truth
compared
to what it is not: lie.
What is know compared
to what it is
not: believe. What's mercy
compared to what it's not: sacrifice.
What's peace (rest;
stable: Christ
minded) compared to what it's not: division (unrest;
unstable: Double
minded). In all scenarios the allegoric comparison
is as if comparing two
Gods:
Law vs Grace: Enmity vs Friend. One is both constructive and
destructive (good and evil): God their Destroyer.
One
is constructive (good): God our Saviour.
Twain Shew is about comparing to find the
better of two things: Jesus --> Christ
In an
allegorical Twain Shew
one of twain this/that (before/after) things seems better of good/better. So of old/new
testaments the
New Testament calls itself a "better testament" having a "better hope" of
good/better
hopes. Such is perhaps why we generally say unto $ick people: I hope
you're feeling "better" soon.
But the twain part of the shew can also be law vs law or
laws vs grace. There is no better of law vs law is loser vs loser, as
the second (law) is like unto the first (law): sin and death, when
connecting the biblical dots of Matthew 22: 36-40 and Romans 8:2; Not
to mention CJ is mirrorly reverse of JC, and all who will live godly (childish)
in CJ shall
suffer, because CJ end focuses on Jesus, whereas
JC end focuses on Christ. We are the body
of Christ, not body of Jesus. For
Jesus, who brought division and not peace, did not give them rest; But
Christ is our peace who abolished
the law to bring an end to law vs law and laws vs grace divisions among
people of God.
God Shew is about finding out what's best
of three
things: Jesus-->Christ-->God
In an
allegorical God Shew
it's much more
than just this/that (left/right). It compares three
things as Good Better Best and Great Greater Greatest;
With the "greatest" of three things (charity) being
neither great (faith) nor greater (hope),
since great can also be the "great terror" of "great tribulation" and
greater can also be "greater damnation".
So then, "that
God
is
light(grace),
and in him there is no darkness(law) at
all". Or we could say know-ing is above and beyond faith-ing
and
hope-ing. Or we could say reconciled no longer requires mediation nor
intercession. Or we could say a more excellent way is neither broad nor
narrow minded, since the broad way leads to destruction and the narrow
leadeth to life, but only by go on unto perfect-ion has no part-ialtiy
whatsoever. Or we could say when you of ye/you, you still have to pass
the holiness with sobriety test, since it is notably you of ye/you who
can still do the humpty dumpty perdition fall back to law: Galatians
5:4.
In a Shew it's Clarify Clarify Clarify
until there's no miss-understanding.
Comparing laws with grace is as comparing
spiritual things with spiritual;
But comparing of first man Adam
with last Adam is not rightly dividing.
For rightly
dividing not only compares soul vs spirit, but spirit vs spirit;
Since 1John 4:1 doesn't say try soul vs spirit, but does say try the spirits.
The
biblical word shew is unique to the
Holy Bible. The word shew is not found in most dictionaries, nor
properly
understood by most so-called Bible scholars. The Holy Bible, in "which
things are an allegory"
(Galatians 4:24), is "written
aforetime for our learning" (Romans
15:4), as a triple "mystery"
(Colossians 2:2)
to be
solved in time by seek and "find grace",
"in time" to "help": Hebrews 4:16. So, if shew is replaced with show in
modern Bibles,
it tends to create shallow confusion rather than depth of clarity. My
motto is clarify clarify clarify until there is no miss added to
under-standing, and even then go onward and upward from standing to
seated denotes the matter is settled. For there is no drawing back to
perdition once you reach settled of made perfect --> stablished
--> strengthened --> settled by "the God of all grace" in 1Peter
5:10; Which is notably the "after" part of such a ye/you (before/after:
created/made) scenario. For Jesus is right "standing" in heavens on high: Acts 7:55, but
Christ "sitteth" right above:
Colossians 3: 1-3. So the shew must go on until you all are risen and seated with
Christ above,
by being led of the Spirit (Grace) instead of driven by the Ghost
(Law): the schoolmaster who fails every student. Seated with Christ
higher than the heavens is notably for us, of them/us; For in us-ward there's no them vs them,
just as in perfect
wholeness
there's no divisional
part-iality nor hypocrisy.
Show vs Shew is as broad way vs narrow
way,
and the Shew goes on to a more excellent way,
a way that's neither broad nor narrow minded,
like a man that's put away childish things (laws).
Show, as the broad way, leads many to destruction by only comparing law
with law instead of comparing laws with grace; Only comparing natural
with spiritual instead of comparing spiritual things with spiritual. So
of
before/after, many never really get to the after part that's true(grace),
but think they do by choosing another law, which is
another lie, and perversion
not conversion.
Receive the promise comes
after do the will of God, which many assume is love thy
neighbor: 2nd law;
When the will of God
is "I will have mercy (grace), not and
sacrifice (law)", with the "not" part being not then, not now, not ever
(Ps
40:6; Ps 51:16; Hos 6:6; Mt 9:13; Mt 12:7; Heb 10).
In a pre 1900 HOLY
BIBLE (one neither Protestant nor
Roman Catholic, but purposed to
make God's holy truth the more known), I found both
"shew" and "show" used by
Bible Translators more meticulous about translating than scribes
about scribing. Hence it reasoned, both were used on purpose. I asked
God
why, since many now presume shew is an old english
idiom better replaced by show.
Many (deceived by many) also replace
"ye" with "you" because they think ye is old english, unaware
both ye/you are oft
used in the same verse (Eg: 1Peter
5:10 KJV) for before/after shew; Ye also
being a biblical plural of
you. When it comes to error it's "ye do err"; but concerning perfection
it's "you:. "the kingdom of God is within you". No doubt the
objective of the Bible is
to change ye to you, as if changing
child to man, and as if changing ignorance to understanding. But
replacing ye with you
in such allegorical verses seems to have the opposite affect, as the evidence reveals:
adults are being more childish than ever, and ignorance is more
prevalent than ever, even among elders.
Although good
intentioned, replacing shew with show in modern Bible versions
has
actually
been legalistically both good +
evil, ends badly, with evil, and such adds miss
to understanding. For
contrary to popular belief and unbelief JC neither
obeyed nor disobeyed any law, nor does Revelation end badly
for
any of you; Because his angel
plays the last
trump, to which the last and singular "Amen" goes; Which
makes
both the Bible and you all one thing: Holy (not Holy Holy). For the
Bible containing Old and New Testaments may compare two Holies: Law vs Grace, but
ends only Holy, and notably because of no mention of Law at all
means no sin and death at all.
Twain Shew
may help many understand biblical things
are allegorical,
written as a comparison and contrast of "contrary"
things: as twain parts in such a before/after shew of child/man (1Cor
13:11), this/that calling for a decision of this
or that, not both. For contrary things cannot coexist in
peace, and a mixture of twain is an oxy-MORON with a BAD ending. Christ
is our peace (not
war,
nor peace + war). The Lord is
now (of then/now) that
Spirit (of this/that Spirits): Grace of Law/Grace; and where the
Spirit(God: Grace: Truth) of the
Lord, there is liberty (not both liberty and bondage).
Shew Bread
may also help many to get it: understanding, as specific
shewbread topics are explained in detail, and it's the safe sort of
bread: meat: food for
thought, not expired
sort that's toxic(harmful) as hell(law).
God Shew
is also about specific topics, but
more in depth, more than just a this/that shew; Yet perhaps more for
those
in ministry or those seeking
l-o-n-g enough to understand thinking is allowed, even encouraged, and
it's only a
shew that has a happy ever after ending for you all.
The Shew
is
an ongoing e-book at Godshew.org that I never seem to get to, due to so
many emails to answer. In The Shew there's twain
kings,
kingdoms, crowns, and thrones of old, but in a new and better
testament there's only one King of kings, one kingdom, one crown, on
one
throne of "grace". There may
be
Scriptures (plural) of old, opposing scripts per say,
but a Galatians 4 shewdown asks
and answers: "what saith the script-u-are" (of plural and
contrary scriptures)? The answer is: "Cast out the
bondwoman and her"; Which things are an allegory. So the allegoric
answer is: cast out the law as dung, and the result of law: sin and
death. In a shew down
there's both first/last Adams, as before/after one man shows,
the after part of child/man being the second coming, a better one of
twain: "that Jesus Christ is come"
(1John4). Eg: a
"greater" one (of great/greater) is here, as the Lord of Lords who's
Lord of all: winner
take all in the final
shewdown of Revelation. Yet even in Revelation it's not as simple
as one of twain, since the beast thou sawest was, and is not, yet is.
So there is a third aspect to consider of Zion/Sion/Neither, since Zion
is not Sion in the Old Testament, Zion doesn't occur in the New
Testament, and there's a stumbling block laid in Sion to be aware of,
lest not being aware of it you stumble and fall, from grace to law
again. So the "weight" to lose in Hebrews 12, in order to do the end
"run" along "with patience", is sacrifice, which is of the law, which
God will not have, not then, not now, not ever. For bloodshed does not
purge the conscience of all sin, only "almost all", leaving sacrifice
adherents short of purged, and thereby short of entering in; For there
is no leaven allowed in higher heaven, which is higher than the heavens
on high. So let us clarify clarify clarify, till there's no miss to
understanding; And when we fully under-stand, standing firm in grace of
law/grace, let us consider it's till division and not peace, peace not
being achieved by winning a sides war, but being the absence of sides
and wars thereof. I don't want the peace that passeth all
understanding, nor the presumed peace of winning a sides war; but
rather the under-standing of Jesus and the seated above of Christ that
brings internal and eternal peace via all law being abolished to the point
of vanish; For
Colossians 2:14 speaks of "blotting
out" law was against us, not of mending it or even mentioning
it. So the end of the shew already written (called the last trump)
makes no mention of law at all, only of grace: "The grace of our Lord JC with you all.
Amen". That is Grace --> Mercy --> True Peace.
There's notably twain mountains
that are sevenfold in Hebrews
12, but
also clarity which
is witch, both there and elsewhere. Eg: Zion is not Sion in the Old
Testament, Zion is not mentioned in the New Testament, and there is a
stumbling stone laid in Sion to be aware of, since many stumble and
fall when unaware of it. Hebrews may begin as a grace
walk from mountain to mountain, and through
the valley of the shadow of death; And when established in
grace there's no fear of
such phantom menace. Also
the grace walk
becomes a grace run
when "seeing
we also are compassed about" with sow dog gone much law law it looks
like a latter worse.
However the end to endure unto, to be saved(only) by grace(only) is
already written; And notably Pauline written
as if playing the last trump,
to assure that none
perish by grace instead of all perish by law. For nobody really
dies in a shew, which is written aforetime for our learning, to learn what Matthew 9:13 meaneth.
For it is preposterous order to teach first and learn after; And harm
full to be lawed after-ward.
The grace
of our Lord
Jesus Christ with you all.
Amen.
|