Biblical Twain
Shew 7 Allegory
|
Twain Shew: Page 7Two Ways of Three: Matthew 7Two Wisdoms: of James 3: 15-17 Two Witnesses: of Revelation 11 Two Words (of 2 Gods): Law vs Grace Two Worlds: "this world" & "that world" (JC said God said: my kingdom is not of this world) |
| TwainShew
is the comparison of
two biblical allegory
things making up this/that gospels.
Example: Abraham had two sons by two mothers: these "are"
the two covenants; and "this" Agar "is" Mt Sinai...which
things "are" an
"allegory"(Gal 4). And wheresoever this
gospel shall be preached throughout the whole world, also that shall be told(Mk 14). Dare
to compare
law/grace as first/last, before/after, great/greater, good/better
things God provided for them/us. "he(Christ) is our peace who hath made both one ... to make in himself of twain one new man" Of twain (law/grace): "he taketh away the first that he may establish the second" (Heb 10:9) |
| Twain links | A - B | C - F | G - I | J - M | N - Q | R - T | U - Z | Conclusion of all this/that| |
|
Twain Allegory Comparisons on
this U - Z page: |
Two Veils
|
| Two Waters
| Two Ways | Two Wisdoms
| Two
Witnesses | Two
Words
| Two Worlds
| |
|
Hebrews 9: 3: And after
the second veil, the
tabernacle which is called the Holiest of all
Hebrews 9 tells us there's a second veil, beyond which went the high priest only, and only yearly, to offer blood sacrifice for both his errors and the errors of the people; But Hebrews 9 also tells us such blood sacrifice of and to the law could not make him that did the service perfect (concept repeated in Hebrews 10), as pertaining to the conscience. But Christ (is the end of the law = no error) being come a high priest of (only) good things (grace only) to come (grace void of law = life void of death), entered "once" into the holy place not made with (plural) hands (allegory: not both good and evil, as law was), and to obtain "eternal" redemption for "us"(of them vs them/us). So we are not talking bloodshed of and to the law for errors, nor an unpurged conscience as the result; But by the blood of Christ (is the end of the law), that is allegorically pure grace, the conscience is purged of sin consciousness, once and for all. Hebrews 9 goes on to tell us such is purpose of the new testament (new covenant), and the testator of such (the law) has to become a dead testator for it to be of force, which allegorically says law has to be dead testator for grace to be of force. If there be mention of a "second veil" (Hebrews 9:3), and of the veil being "rent" in "twain" (notably in the midst: Luke 23:45) "from top to bottom", and of the "holiest" (of holy holier holiest) being beyond the second veil, through the veil, that is (through) his flesh (from which he abolished the law), as if through Jesus-->Christ to "the end of the law", through the cross to risen and seated, perhaps even beyond (up-left vs up-right) to all-right above such division; Well then it reasons such is allegoric and there are two veils to consider; perhaps allegorically as two cover ups to uncover(revelation). For when it comes to greatest of three things that never faileth, such is not even grace of law/grace, but pure grace void of law, which thinketh no evil (no law) to even forgive. For by mention of holiest in connection with veil, perhaps the renting of the first veil in twain and the lifting of, or going through and beyond, the second veil is necessary to see all three things: holy holier holiest. Indeed the law is holy of such three. As mentioned it is also good of allegoric good better better things and great of great greater greatest things. But it also written grace of law -vs- grace is holier: "better", "greater" (yet only for some, us of them/us). And pure grace (allegory: pure religion, pure wisdom, perfect love, perfect God, which is merciful), grace alone, all grace and no law at all, seems to be what is holiest of holy holier holiest, the greatest of great greater greatest, and what's best (of good better best) for all of some/all. Moses gave the law (John 1:17) that's holy, but such grace + law(added), both good + evil, is also a holy "terror" (Deuteronomy 34:12). Of Jesus Christ, by which came grace and truth, "Jesus" first gives us "division" and not peace, division of grace + law(added) into grace vs law; which is grace or law, good or evil: "either make the tree good or corrupt(evil)", since they are contrary things which cannot coexist in peace (and he "is" our "peace": Eph 2, which speaks of existence without an enemy); For Law vs Grace are as contrary as lie(law) vs truth(grace) in John 1:17, as contrary as accuse and approve in John 5:45, as contrary as war(division) and peace(rest). But Christ is the end of the law: the end of law vs law & law vs grace divisions. Veil (soulish & fleshy): Mt 27:51; Mk 15:38; Lk 23:45; Heb 6:19; Heb 9:13; Heb 10:20 Vail (blinder, done away in Christ): 2Cor 3:13; 2Cor 3:14; 2Cor 3:15; 2Cor 3:16 There is mention of "veil" and "vail", with mention of "veil" being associated with the "soul" (Hebrews 6:19) of soul/spirit, and of "flesh" (Hebrews 10:20) of flesh/spirit; And mention of "vail" associated with mind & heart blindness: unable to see all law got abolished by Christ. So even beyond the second veil of the old covenant it is still soulish(first Adam), not spiritual(last Adam). But even after the dividing assunder soul/spirit, of two Adams, there is still the "comparing spiritual things with spiritual" to do, or the comparing of last Adam (Jesus) with Christ (neither first nor last Adam). For as in Adam all die, but in Christ shall all be made alive. So we see veils(laws) and the vail(blindness) are taken away in Christ(is the end of the law). For eternal life & peace with God are notably "through Jesus-->Christ" end focuses on Christ. So there are lots of twists in the allegoric mysteries (of God, and of the Father, and of Christ) to sort out; And solving the mysteries requires taking away of veils(laws) and vail(blindness). And when it comes to God is one slice, the only wise God (of foolish/wise Gods), the only true God (of false/true Gods), the living God (of dead/living Gods), that God (of this/that Gods), the only Potentate, the King of Kings and Lord of Lords, the eternal and immortal one of such twain, who is of was/is; Well it seems it is (allegorically) "the God of all: grace" (no law at all). |
|
As God let there be a firmament
in the midst of waters that the wee spirit of God had moved upon the
face of, and let such firmament called Heaven "divide" the waters under
from above; so also the Son of God firstly speaks of "division", and of
waters: this and that waters, as if words which either quench the
thirst for righteousness or quench the Spirit instead of the thirst.
John 4: 13,14: Whosoever drinketh of "this"
water shall thirst again:
But whosoever drinketh of the water "that I" shall give him shall never thirst. Such talk of waters takes us to the deep end of the ocean, for one of the seven last utterances (which are a menorah seven with twain Gods in the midst) on the cross at Easter is: "I thirst". In saying "I thirst", and as if reading lines to be spoken at appointed times from a cue card, Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews, reveals this Jesus of Jesus Christ, and also this Christ of Christ Jesus, are allegorical for the law, which is king of the Jews... and in the same manner "this" Agar is Mt Sinai in Galatians 4, where it reveals such things are an allegory. For in saying "I thirst" Jesus is declaring he has not yet himself drunk of water that quenches thirst forever, being allegorically the end of the law, or pure grace, also called pure wisdom from above. For pure wisdom, from above: Grace unto you from God our Father, makes no mention of law; Whereas Jesus, of Jesus Christ, does make mention of law, and Christ is the end of the law, the part of JC who is raised up, revived, and seated at the right hand of God. |
|
In Matthew 7:13,14 two gates and two ways
are compared and
contrasted as if two
leaders leading many and few in opposite directions: destruction <=
broad way | narrow way => life; much like <= BC | AD =>
are accounted as opposite ways. Yet even the better one of twain
(good/better) ways only "leadeth unto" life (the abundant and eternal
sort), the other way leadeth unto destruction: ruin, death ... which
certainly negates
the silly saying that all paths lead to God; For "destruction" spoken
of is the sort dinosaurs had: "was, and is not", an end
called 'extinction'; and evidently (from biblical evidence given) such
was the dead end of all those in Heb 7:23; 11: 13,29. Yet all shall
eventually live, for it is only a shew; and notably written
"aforetime" for our "learning": Romans 15:4
And when considering that even the narrow way of broad/narrow ways only "leadeth unto" life, such gives place to charity: a third way called "a more excellent way" which "never faileth", and because love perfected is the "greatest" of "three things": great greater greatest. So those who get it up-right, think they're better than others and have arrived at life, should think again, look up higher than the heavens and the childish blame game of them vs them. For the better of good better best ways only "leadeth unto" life. And "there is no respect of persons with God". Immediately after two ways spoken of in Mt 7, two trees are also compared and contrasted, one good and an other evil. Since a good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, nor an evil tree bring forth good fruit, it indicates there is no law in grace nor any grace in law... the point of "either make the tree good or evil" being the question is grace "or" law, not oxymoronic twain... the third way of the third day being all grace and no law at all, so none perish from "a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump" (a little law can kill whole body just like a little cancer does). The wrong (broad) way of twain is a perverted and polluted oxymoronic mixture of grace + law, witch is as blessed + cursed = accursed, and as life + death = a dead end, a bad ending which was a dead end for all those Melchesedic type ministerial folk mixing grace + law in Heb 7:23, also the sort of end all such ministers of law shall have in 2Cor 11:15, the sort all blind faith heroes had in Heb 11: 13,29, and the sort all the followers of Moses had in Jude 5. |
|
In James 3 two wisdoms are compared and contrasted following a short bitter sweet sermon: one wisdom from above(higher than the heavens), the other wise not being from above; One wisdom being firstly pure and thereby firstly peace-able, the other wise, another law, being not pure nor peace-able. Solomon clarifies wisdom from above is as having understanding = "grace glory" (Proverbs 4), saying "with all thy getting, get understanding", and also goes on to explain such glory-us wisdom is "grace glory". Paul talks of using such wisdom to stand fast in the liberty of His grace. The wisdom from above (Grace unto you...from God our Father), in James 3, is "firstly pure" (hence pure grace, which is mercy full, as James also points out). On the contrary law is merciless (all who died under Moses' law died without mercy: Hebrews). Only by such wisdom (grace) being "firstly pure" is it also firstly "peace-able" of seven things grace is. So, we could say no pure grace, no peace possible, especially if contrary things cannot coexist, not in peace. No wonder there is no peace in the Middle East, for there is a perverted and polluted mixture of grace + law, among jews, muslims, and even christians (unaware Christ: is the end of the law). Also noteworthy in James 3 is firstly pure wisdom from above (pure grace from God), has seven characteristics: (i) peace-able, (ii) gentle (iii) easily intreated, (iv) full of mercy (as God is in Lk 6:36), (v) full of good (God) fruit (fruit of the Spirit, first being love, against such "no law": Gal 5), (vi) without partiality ("no respect of persons with God"), (vii) without hypocrisy. Related
GodShew.org Web pages:
The other-wise of two wisdoms Two Sorts of Biblical Religion: IMPure and Pure Religion |
|
The two witnesses mentioned in
Revelation 11 are allegorically
OT Law and NT Law in the form of Moses and Elias (aka John the Baptist)
who appeared from an overshadowing
cloud on the high
mountain apart and who notably "spake" of "decease" (law: death) to
Jesus; For no man is justified by the law in the sight of God and law
imputing sin has this penalty: surely die... Unless we let law be dead testator
of the New Testament which makes the OT null & void.
Moses is allegorically described as accuser of the brethren in John 5:45; And John the Baptist (as the second coming of Elijah) lost his head for condemning a king, and thereby condemned himself to death (Romans 2:1) via his own mouth (Job 15:6; Matthew 15:11; Mark 7:20-23). So, by these two witnesses, who have power to shut heaven and bring all manner of plagues, it becomes evident that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God; No, not even Jesus, who was heard in that he feared, and felt as forsaken as the plural Psalmist David for having Law Law as Gods, rather than one blessed and only Potentate: Grace.. Related
GodShew.org Web pages:
Jehovah's Witnesses Two Beasts of Revelation 13 Two Laws of Mt 22 & Rom 8 |
|
If there is a singular word of God it
reasons the counter part (for the sake of a shew
) a singular word not of God. Two such words come to mind: grace and
law. The law was given by
Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus
Christ. One word, the law, spake as a lie, an accusation, a
ministration of condemnation and death (2Cor 3). In comparison and
contrast the grace of Jesus Christ, being truthful (Jn 1:14), spoke no
accusation (Jn 5:45), no condemnation (Jn 3:17), no death (Jn 10:10).
When dividing twain, rightly dividing the word
of truth reveals you are approved unto God (2Tim 2:15), whereas the
other wise of Mt 25:41 is disapproved. What is right and
with God is grace and truth. Law and lie are left and against God.
In Heb 4:12 the word of God (grace) is seven things: (i) quick ... alive (ii) powerful ... full of gospel (good news) (iii) sharper than any twoedged sword ... sharper than grace + law or law + grace (iv) piercing even to dividing assunder of soul and spirit ... first Adam a living soul, last Adam a quickening spirit (v) piercing even to dividing assunder of joints and marrow (vi) a discerner of the thoughts of the heart (vii) discerner of the intents of the heart. From such clarity we know what's coming out the mouth of a priestlike figure in Revelation 1 is not the word of God; For what comes out of such mouth is a twoedged sword. The word of God is "sharper" than any twoedged sword. James clarifies blessing + cursing coming out "the same" mouth ought not so to be. We ought not think Jesus Christ ("the same" in Heb 13) speaks grace + law; but rather divided such and spoke truth about each, denoting such were as contrary as two ways , and gave no place to the law in Mt 24:21. In the Gospel according to John we find something unique to John, a double "verily, verily"; indicating two truths being spoken: truth about the law (it's an under taker), and truth about grace (it's a life giver). Although it's not plain, John compares two words as if before and after: (i) the word (law) was God (ii) the same, always graceful & truthful, is the word made flesh, to shew which is the only begotten (word) of God. He also compares his namesake, John the Baptist and "the same" (JC) as if before and after: the before not being that Light nor true light ... hence beheaded for fault finding the king; the after being as if that Light were made flesh to be a witness of that God ... also seven miracles and seven I am statments distinguish this -vs- that as if a "division" of the two words was necessary because many were erroneously mixing grace + law; two contrary words which do not mix except to make an oxymoron such as life + death, witch was a dead end for them all. |
|
Biblical references to "world" are so
plentiful it is quite difficult to sort out which is witch of twain
allegorical worlds. However we do find a distinction made between
this and that world ; "this world" being spoken of as
"evil". Hence JC said God said: I am not of "this world" (Jn 8:23), and
my kingdom is not of "this world" (Jn 18:36). So, Paul says: be not
conformed to "this world" (Rom 12:2); and then he talks of renewing the
mind to prove "that"
will of God is good, acceptable, and "perfect".
Perfection, the sort your Father is in heaven, is clarified
as merciful (see Mt 5:48 & Lk 6:36). But the law wasn't
perfect (Heb 8:7), nor merciful (Heb 10:28).
Obviously then, "that world" mentioned in Lk 20:35, which speaks of resurrection from the dead and of dying no more, simply speaks of no law, which made nothing perfect (Heb 7), nor can law ever make comers thereunto perfect (Heb 10:1). The wisdom of "this world", the mixing of grace + law, adding law to my grace is sufficient, is foolishness with God (1Cor 3:19). Eph 6:12 speaks of the darkness of "this world", denoting in such a world are prinicpalities, powers (gospels), and rulers, all plural, denoting a mixture of grace + law. But two "contrary things" do not mix except to make an oxymoron. The paradox of life + death is a dead end. Contrary things can't co-exist in peace. So, if C of J->C is our peace, he's not grace + law; only grace. This world is also spoken of in reference to "time past" (Eph 2:2), and to the darkness thereof, which speaks of ignorance as something which "passeth away" (1Cor 7:31), perhaps when I am the light of the world is come, a time when awareness and understanding replace ignorance and misunderstanding. And so it is said the princes (plural) of this world come to "nought", suggesting grace + law (life + death) is a dead end. A reference to the prince of this world having nothing in me also suggests there's no law in His grace. There's no death nor any ministration of death in a "living" God of the "living", the God of all: grace. In Hebrews a comparison is made between time past & last days, as <- BC & AD -> are times accounted oppositely. For as opposite ways (Mt 7) leadeth to opposite things, the begin of law leadeth to destruction (non existence), and the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ (the end of the law) leadeth to life (existence), the eternal sort: life (grace) void of death (law). As in Adam all die speaks of a surely die by law JC abolished to become the author of eternal salvation. Hence we, as if finisher of he authored, are exhorted to likewise reckon ourselves dead to the law, lest all die by the law. Dying to the law we become alive unto God(Grace). The first fruit of the Spirit is love, and against such there is "no law" (Gal 5). Where no law there no transgression. And when no law, no sin imputed. When no sin imputed, no sting of sin: no death. That world, in contrast to "this present evil world", is as awakening from the sleep of death, as if from a nightmare(like the "night visions" Daniel had from reading a book of law). See the main index page for Twain Shew See why(?) "also that" is told ww Conclusion: TwainShew page 8 The grace of our Lord Jesus
Christ with you all. Amen.
|