Two Resurrections ... Two Sabbaths ... Two Trumps ...

Twain Allegory Comparisons on this R - T TwainShew page:

Two Resurrections | Two Reconcileds | Two Religions | Two Rests | Two Revelations |
| Two Sabbaths | Sacrifices | Salvations | Two Servants | Sins | Sons | Spirits |
| Two Testaments | Two Testators | Two Thems | Two Times | Two Trees | Two Trumps

Mention of a "first resurrection" in Revelation 20 denotes a last resurrection to find & contrast, as does mention of a "last trump" denote a first to compare, and mention of a "second death" denotes a first to contrast, in a two testament God shew wherein God is "excepted"(exempt). So in the new and better testament of old/new testaments it is further purposed to shew [who is] the blessed and only Potentate of Jesus Christ in his "times" as: (i) the son of David(had two sons: Solomon and Nathan; and a greater than Solomon is here) (ii) the son of Abraham(had two sons: Ishmael and Isaac; and we are not children of the bondwoman, but of the free). For eternal life is "through Jesus->Christ" ends with "that Christ" thereof is the Son of the living God (of dead/living Gods)... if you follow my clarifying allegory clues about the tripe allegoric mystery (i) of God and (ii) of the Father and (iii) of Christ has lots of twists to it requiring give more earnest heed to escape (of "no escape" or "escape") wrath to come. Escape is not by rapture theories nor resurrections, but enduring unto the end to be saved(only) by grace(only); the end written in every Pauline Epistle by his own hand, including Hebrews and Revelation.

So, there's twain of everything, and also the aspect of when "spiritual" of natural/spiritual there's still "comparing spiritual things(law law) with spiritual(grace)" to do. For in the "new" of old/new testaments there's still a new & dead way (their end) to have or a new & living way (of charity never faileth, also called perfection) to go on unto by leaving the principles, even those of the narrow way (of broad/narrow ways) "leadeth unto" life can be  life + death(does not end with life) by a draw back to perdition prior to "the end" having life only is no dead end.

Two resurrections, both from "graves", mentioned in John 5: 29 are
    - "the resurrection of life"(for "they" that have done good), and
    - "the resurrection of damnation"(for "they" that have done evil);
But law is both good and evil. So law law resurrections for two sorts of them. And if considered as first & last resurrections, last would be the resurrection of "damnation" is defined as condemnation and accusation, which God did "not" send his Son to do (Jn 3:17) nor would he do (Jn 5:45); Not even to the woman(church) caught in adult-ery and brought unto him to judge (Jn 8:3-11). Both resurrections in John 5 are notably of "they" having "their end" shall be according to "their works": as plural resurrections "of the dead", not one "from the dead"; Resurrections of dead, from graves, to left & right places on "high" in law law "heavens": the child of hell seated left in Moses' seat & more the child of hell standing right with Jesus; Neither a Christ ascension "far above the heavens" to God in heaven: higher than the heavens. So then Mt 23 "hypocrites, fools, vipers, blind guides" seated left & "worse" standing right; And not only child-ish in both cases, but "spiritual wickedness in high [places]": Eph 6:12. In contrast, in "Christ"("the end of the law"), it's one resurrection for all, to far above the heavens. For of a truth, "there is no respect of persons with God" and Christ is the Saviour of the world.
 
The "first resurrection" mentioned twice in Rev 20:5,6 is notably labeled "this"(of this/that), and a first resurrection where the rest of the dead "lived not"; Not an all live happily ever after scenario. Rather the before of before/after, the ye(do err) of ye/you, the oops of many get deceived (carried away) with rapture theories instead of endure unto the end to be saved(only) by grace(only) rather than both saved + destroyed after by grace + law is as life + death(does NOT end with life). He that hath "part" in the first resurrection is said to be "blessed and holy"; But perhaps with the first of twain blesseds, and via the 1st of twain Holys (perhaps the two Comforters mentioned in Jn 14 & 15), the 2nd of such lie/truth being the "Spirit of truth". Not to mention "they" noted therein who shall be (plural) "priests" of God and of Christ(of CJ) reign only 1,000yrs(is as 1 day: 2Pet 3:8) are the "many" deceived, and the sort of "priests" noted in Heb 7:23 who are "not suffered to continue (the human race) by reason of death". Selah.

Which is as if saying every good "mystery" has lots of twists, especially near the end. And when it comes to both "allegory" & "mystery": the allegoric mystery thereof can get very tricky, to the point of deceiving even the elect if possible. But the incorruptible cannot be corrupted. So we're exhorted to put off a corruptible crown "they" desire to put on a incorruptible crown. For "they" are them who'd have two resurrections; Whereas "we" would have only one resurrection of both the just and unjust, of all unto life only, not unto life + death(does NOT end with life). Nor would we have the resurrection of damnation(condemnation, accusation) to a high place, is actually a low place, below united heaven is higher than (divided) heavens on high, are both hellish. For it's both a "fall"(from grace) and a "fearful" thing, to "fall into the (plural)hands of God" on high in heavens. So Galatians, written "unto the churches" which are "foolish", thereby "bewitched", says in Gal 5:4 to such like: "Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace". And such admonition preceded by: it's evident from evidence that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God.

Many, deceived by many, comfort one another with the first of two comforts in 1Th 4 & 5, via the first of two Comforters in Jn 14 & 15. In the case of two trumps, the dead in Christ rise first, but such speaks of the Christ of "Christ Jesus" (reverse of Jesus Christ), not  of peace with God is through Jesus Christ; Not to mention "there is no respect of persons with God" and in the Christ of Jesus Christ: the end the law, there are no dead. For in him is no sin, which speaks of no law (when no law, no sin imputed: Rom 5:13), which speaks of no death, as law is both the source and the strength of sin, which brings forth death (1Cor 15:56; Jam 1:15). Which is to say the life many are offered is both life + death, via both truth(grace) + lie(law).

To wit, that God was in Christ reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them (where no law, there is no transgression: Rom 4:15)... 2Cor 5:19. Like God, being his "express image" (not mirror image), Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, to day, and for ever (Heb 13). He came, with grace and truth (not law and lies), to do the will of God, which is the same in both Old & New Testaments: "I will have mercy, and not sacrifice". And of false/true spirits, the trueth is "that Jesus Christ is come", and to pay a visit, not a ransom.

As for the (second) resurrection, it is as an awakening (to righteousness) from sleep (death), a a remembering what you are, a renewing of the mind (from dblemindead to Christ minded), a conversion from them to us, beginning as a grace walk from Mt Sinai to Mt Sion, which becomes a "run" along "with patience" unto the end having no death when it is seen "we also are compassed about" with so great a cloud of law law witnesses; Also a chanGe of Glory: from (law) glory to (grace) glory, and a change of faith: from (blind)faith to (seeing)faith: to both saved & aware what we're saved(delivered) from: "We are delivered from the law". Then [cometh] the end...1Cor 15... the best of good better best. When the God shew is truly ended, then it(is finished) never happened, like the real magic at the end of the Merlin movie: When they stop acknowledging evil(law), then such law law vanishes along with dead works thereof.

Law waxeth so old it's both "ready to vanish" (Heb 8:13) and "shall vanish" (1Cor 13:8). Only then is there a resurrection from the dead, from the dead works of law law folk who believe life + death ends with life. Obviously "they" are mistaken, taken in a fault, for life + death does not end with life. Not to mention the over-all objective is not to believe all this and that, rather "know" the difference between all this and that portrayed in a God shew, for compare-i-son.

Two Reconcileds: Romans 5's two one man scenarios

There are two mentions of "reconciled" in Romans 5:10. The second is notably a "much more" reconciled, in the same manner as where sin abounded, grace did "much more" abound; indicating there is an even higher calling than just getting it right of the left/right sides of a war. And "much more" abounding grace (than the grace of law/grace) does not impute sin, as "charity" (love perfected: void of fear) the "more excellent way" and "greatest" of "three things", does not impute sin. For love not perfected fails, even the agape sort of filio/agape loves tends to fail. But "charity never faileth", being "above" such things as "forgiving one another" in Col 3. For when no law, sin not imputed: Rom 5:13; And where sin not imputed, nothing to forgive.

Two reconcileds reflect the need to be twice reconciled if twice fallen, or the need for two uprisings if Babylon the great "is fallen, is fallen". It reasons if Babylon the "great" is twice fallen to "great" <- greater <- greatest, that the ultimate reconciliation of such twice fallen Babylon, or what is commonly called 'universal reconciliation', global reconciliation unto God our Father in "heaven", requires two uprisings: first from great to greater, then (great/greater) -> greatest. We could also perceive such as first being reconciled to the better of twain good/better, then further reconciled to best of (good/better) -> best by leaving "principles" as noted in Heb 6.

Two Religions: Impure Religion and Pure Religion

The mention of "pure religion" in James 1:27 allegorically denotes there is also impure religion to compare. A study of the epistles of Paul The Apostle reveals impure religion is grace + law, the law thereof being faulty, impure, imperfect, even a lie from the beginning. Since grace "is" and law "added", the only mixture plausible is grace + law, and since they are contrary things it makes a perverted and polluted mixture called an oxymoron, one with a bad ending such as life + death = a dead end. Hence it is said law the strength of sin, and the sting thereof is death.

Learn more about two religions: impure/pure noting that pure religion paid a "visit", not ransom.

Two Rests: Death vs Cease Divisions

The rest(peace) offered by Holy Ghost Law is supposed rest in peace of death; And many who believed law have entered such death, but perhaps not true peace(rest), as noted by the story in Luke 16:20-31 where the rich man died and afterward had torment, not rest(peace). This man may have ceased from his works in death, but his law works followed him into death, to torment him. So it is written in Hebrews 4 if Jesus had given them rest would he not afterward have spoken of another day; Perhaps  the third [day] in which he shall be perfected.

Folks, it's been the third day is also the seventh day for seven years already, beyond 2000AD. So let us put away law that we may also be perfected rather than fooled by law into death followed by potential torment that seems to last forever.

The other sort of rest is to cease from divisional works, as God did from his works, to have seventh day rest of grace void law. Such speaks of ceasing from all law vs law, and even from law vs grace divisions, since even law vs grace is division and not peace, which gives place to law. Above such divisions there is only grace, mercy, peace; Only unity and no divisions at all. Such is the only eternal rest for all in the end written, but it can also be entered into while living.

Hebrews 4 notes there remaineth therefore a rest to the people of God, by ceasing from all religious and political divisions, works that promote unrest instead of rest, as God did cease from his works. It then specifically notes we should labor to enter into "that rest", in the same manner the Bible also speaks of "that God" and "that Spirit" and "that Light", to distinguish it.

Two Revelations (Uncoverings) For Comparison

In what many commonly call Revelation or the Book of Revelation, and what some mistakenly call The Revelation of Jesus Christ, the actual title is: The Revelation of St John The Divine; And the first verse reveals a second revelation for comparison: The Revelation of Jesus Christ. Only one of Two Revelations is God given; And for a stated purpose: to "shew" things to servants(slaves), who haven't learned what's best of three things is thou art no more a servant. For even being the better sort of two servants is only better for some, not what's best for all.

                  Two Revelations (Uncoverings): For Compare-i-son
                1. The Revelation (Uncovering) of St John The Divine: title
                2. The Revelation (Uncovering) of Jesus Christ: first verse

    1. John turned back to what was "behind" him: Law ("worketh wrath" = "destruction").
    2. Jesus->Christ went on to be the Christ: "the end of the law", "Saviour of the world".

For more details on "which (plural)things are an allegory" (Galatians 4), see Revelations. For since Revelation, by definition, means to uncover, disclose, reveal, discover; We have not one, but twain uncoverings (two revelations): the uncovering(revelations) of a saint named John thought to be the divine, and for comparison the uncovering(revelation) of Jesus Christ, which is found primarily in the Pauline Epistles. It's a full monty of both John and Jesus Christ (allegorically Law & Grace compared as Lie & Truth) to see which is witch; Which one of two revelations (two uncoverings) has what it takes to be winner take all in such a shewdown. Many think closure is the answer, but revelation is about disclosure, uncovering, revealing what's been closed (classified), covered up, hidden; And when proper fully monty revelation comes to a theatre near you, there's nothing hidden that is not also revealed: Luke 8:17; 12:2. Of twain: Law or Grace, Christ is our peace who made of twain one new man that's Grace us.

Two Sabbaths of Easter Passover Week

Revelation(Uncovering), which begins as Revelations, takes place on the sabbath. Such is evident from seven benedictions ("blessed is ...") therein. Customarily 18 benedictions were spoken daily at the temple, by priest within and people without, but only seven on the Sabbath (seventh). Seven benedictions in Revelation reasons it takes place on the Sabbath; Yet perhaps Revelation also begins as a Sabbaths shewdown. For there's two Sabbaths (annual and weekly), perhaps three, to compare in the Holy Bible; Even two Sabbaths the week of the crucifixion ('high' day of Passover and 'higher' seventh day ending week). Yet perhaps of three things high higher highest; the firstly pure sort of wisdom is the highest of three things.

One Sabbath is eternal, called "the day (light) of God" converted Peter exhorts is the day we all ought to be looking for and hastening unto. The other sort, "the day of the LORD", is oft presumed millennial (from misunderstanding Revelation 20's mention of 1,000 yrs), but is not millennial: see Day of the Lord vs Day of God. And since "the first of the week" (Sun day) can also be translated as the 'First of Sabbaths' in Greek, not to mention Sabbath is sometimes plural, sometimes singular in Greek (such as Mt 28:1 & Mk 16:1), well then "the Sabbath" of Sabbaths perhaps not only the better one of twain, but what's best of good better best things; Kinda like one of twain sorts of servants is the better sort, but Gal 4:7 says being a son is best.

The eternal sabbath (seventh day), described in Gen 2 , as well as other places ("that day"), has no mention of evening and morning (as six days in Gen 1). Such a day (light, understanding) of God, speaks of God rested (at peace), but not before God ended blessed and sanctified; to ensure God at rest, is one, who made a decision, to be, the God of all grace: the living God of the living ...for that God knows you can't get any real rest, true peace, with any in-laws around, so there first has to be an end to them and their plural heavens, sides war thereof, along with a better blessed (which is not a law benediction) : Ps 32: 1,2 / Rom 4: 7,8 for man kind of such child/man kinds; even a sanctifying of the will of God (to perfect it), from I will have mercy, and not sacrifice; to "grace with you all" (no sacrifice, not even mention of it in end).

The non eternal & non millennial sabbath (seventh day, day of the LORD) described in Revelation, as well as other places in the Scriptures,  is oft spoken of as a day of "wrath" ... evidently a day of "law", since "law worketh wrath" (Rom 4:15). . But God hath "not" appointed us unto wrath (1Thes 5:9) ; so such isn't called the day of God in 2Pet 3's comparison of two sabbaths. Rather the non eternal sabbath is simply imagined, via mixing two laws (Rom 8:2), thereby becoming law law; and in Revelation 13 it gets even law<-law as first<-second takes place, creating a second up rising of "law worketh wrath" in diverse places, like S.E. 'Asia' perhaps.

Hence what is portrayed in Revelation (of John) is only a 'phantom' menace, a "shadow" (dark version, lie) of good things to come, not the very (true) image. And once we (God will raise us up on the third day) get many (deceived by many) to realize it, recover themselves (2Tim 2) from such imagination (contrary to knowledge of God: "grace is sufficient"), it'll be poof goes the dragon, a flame out. So, when televangelastic deceivers (Mt 24:4,5; Lk 21:8) like Jack of the Impe family (JVI Presents) say they want to 'vanish' (rapture), let them: click! Such hastens us all to the day(light) of God wherein there's no misunderstanding, nor wrath from merciful(perfect) God.

Two Sacrifices: Good/Better: God will not have

The biblical mention of "better sacrifices" in Hebrews 9 implies two sorts of sacrifices are being compared, and of the (good/better) twain, one of twain is the "better" sort. For example a "living sacrifice" mentioned in Romans 12 would be better than a dead sacrifice. Yet even that mention is followed by mention of the "perfect" will of God. So when it comes to what's best of good better best, to God and Son "of God", especially in context with his will and perfection, then it's "I will have mercy, and not sacrifice" (Hos 6; Mt 9) and "thy will be done", not only in heaven, but also on earth. Hebrews 10 mentions Lo, I come to do thy will O God, and in context with "he taketh away the first that he may establish the second", and it also clarifies that God was 'never' pleased with sacrifice (Eg: Ps 40:7), which is "of the law".

So we see, of (Mosaic/JC) law/grace compared as lie/truth (Jn 1:17), grace(truth) does not compromise with law(lie); Rather abolishes the law (Eph 2) to the point of "blotting out" (Col 2) such enmity, even everything written in stone and in ink: 2Cor 3 is to be "done away", because law worketh wrath, destructive wrath (1Thes 5:3), the no escape sort, which God hath "not" appointed us unto: 1Thes 5:9. And of sacrifice/mercy, of such (lie/truth) law/grace, mercy does not compromise with sacrifice either; Rather casts it out in the same manner that love(God), of fear(LORD)/love(God), of such begin/end of fear... love does not compromise with fear either; Rather casts out all fear to be "perfect", because fear hath torment.

So of two sorts of sacrifice, even though one of twain is the better sort, both are as martyr-DUMB in the Bible when it comes to what's greatest of great greater greatest. And in it's in the same manner as law law of Rom 8 (midst of Romans) perceives one law as the better sort of twain, but in the end of Romans there is notably no mention of any law, as in all the conclusions of all the Pauline epistles, including Hebrews and Revelation. Selah.

To understand such a radical concept better, perhaps take a look at the two sorts of servants, and then at be no servant, rather a son in Gal 4:7; Also look at the two sorts of children, then at be no more children in Eph 4, rather be man kind, the perfect ("merciful") sort that Christ (the end of the law) is. Yet also remember when it comes to man/God, God is not a man that he should lie. Ever more clarity via ever more light... until it's all light and no darkness at all.

Two Salvations: Temporal & Eternal Salvation

Biblical mention of "eternal salvation" in Hebrews 5 obviously implies another sort of temporal salvation for comparison & contrast: Temporal Salvation: Saved + Destroyed afterward and Eternal Salvation: Saved(only) by Grace(only) the non eternal  Mosaic sort, the Noahic sort, the temporal sort: salvation + destruction (after) witch was evidently a dead end for all those saved in the flood story because Noah was dblemindead, and also for all those saved out of Egypt because Moses was dblemindead.

        Temporal Salvation: Saved(Graced) + Destroyed(Lawed) = Life + Death.
        Eternal Salvation: Saved(Graced) only, and thereby Life only as "the end".

Saved(Graced) + Destroyed(Lawed) afterward in Jude 5 obviously ends badly, as badly as good + evil, as blessed + cursed, as love + fear, and as grace + law being life + death = dead end. Hence our Lord JC is not the author of such dead end law law, but rather the author of "eternal salvation" (Heb 5:9): being made (Gen 1:26) perfect (merciful: Mt 5:48 / Lk 6:36) , by abolishing "the law"(singular) of "commandments"(plural) in Genesis 2:16 vs 17, abolishing Genesis 2:17's surely die law from his flesh (Eph 2:15), he (Christ: the end of the law) thereby became the "author of eternal salvation".


Eternal Salvation, what we ought to account as "salvation" according to converted Peter, is the long-suffering of the Lord to us-ward, just us thereof, and so none perish. All other salvation is temporal, such grace + law a sacrificial dead end, what God will not have, nor does the Bible. All who think other wise, of two wisdoms, can bend over and kiss their divided ass bye bye; for no amount of lying, crying, or dying will ever change the "immutable" will of God.

Two Servants: But we're exhorted be no servant

There are two servants compared in Romans 6: 17,18: the "servants" of sin and the "servants" of righteousness, with clarity the first sort is unto iniquity, the second is unto holiness. In Romans 6:19 the "unto" in each case being as if draw back to perdition or go on to perfection, unto iniquity(law) or holiness(grace). And as noted in Romans 6:20, when ye were servants of law imputing sin, then ye were free of obedience to righteousness (grace), and when servants of righteousness (grace) then free of obedience to law imputing sin and death thereof. However there's a twist many miss: a "servant" of righteousness is NOT "free", but bound.

Notably the end of the first sort, servants of law (sin and death thereof), is as if being servants of death, faithful to law unto death, have a dead end thereof. The end of the second sort can also go either way: a dead end or a living end; the living end being by go on, to being no servant at all, but rather "a" son, which speaks of true freedom (liberty) of true Son of God (Christ) higher than the Son of God (Jesus) on high, by know-ing is above and beyond faith-ing and hope-ing; As "charity never faileth" is the "greatest" of three things (great->greater)->greatest, the "greatest" being neither great nor greater law law, but "grace" which is neither of two "law"s in Mt 22: 36-40; As charity is neither of the two "love"s therein; Which is to allegory say "more excellent" is neither broadmindead nor narrowmindead.

3. Thou art no more servant, but a son; true Son of true God being "higher" than "on high"
2. Servants: of righteousness (servants of righteousness of another law are still bound by law)
1. Servants: of sin (servants of law: sin and death, are faithful to law unto death: a dead end)

So of this/that sorts of servants, that sort is "some better thing" of good/better things God hath provided for two sorts of them, or two sorts of children, who like "servants" have to be told what to do-eteronomy & don't-eronomy. Yet when considering three things, instead of just comparing two, such as good better best instead of twain this/that, thereby perhaps puffed up unto "another law" of twainy law/law instead of unto grace of law/grace; We find "exhortation" of edified->exhorted->unto comfort (void of dis-comfort) is as if being up lifted from above (exhorted) rather than just built up from below (edified); Being exhorted not to be any servant at all, in the same manner it's Pauline exhorted be no more children. Why? Even children of God on high (God our Destroyer: Law: Enmity: Ministration of death) do childish (devilish) things, like add "law worketh wrath" to "grace is sufficient". A child, even though he be heir of all things, differeth nothing from a servant, as long as he is a child (of child/man). Hence we are not to be a servant, but a son: Gal 4:7; Nor be children, but "man" kind: 1Cor 13:11. For God said "let us make man" (not child). Being made free, made perfect, is no servant at all. Selah.

Two Sins of 1John 5: 16,17

Sin: Unto Death and Sin: Not Unto death ?

First let's define what "sin" is. "Whatsoever is not of faith is sin": Rom 14:23..."the law is not of faith": Gal 3:12. So by connecting biblical dots the law is "sin"; And the law(sin thereof) is "evil": Our Father..."deliver us from evil"(Mt 6:13)..."we are delivered from the law"(Rom 7:6).

Yet do please note such deliverance(salvation) from the law(sin, evil) is  also the "us" part of them/us and the "we" part of they/we: which is (you)r part of ye/you, man part of child/man, new part of old/new, incorruptible part of corruptible/incorruptible crowns they/we seek, spirit-u-all part of soul/spirit, immortal part of mortal/immortal, eternal part of temporal/eternal salvations, be ye "perfect" of imperfect/perfect, "also merciful" of merciless/merciful parts. So in comparing sin(unto death) & sin(not unto death) it's as if we're talking about the nature-u-all part of natural first/spiritual afterward: as if talking law(sin) law(sin) unto carnal childish folk, "them": "forgive them" who "know not" what "they" (of they/we) do and say, "them" (of them/us) who know not what "they say" (Peace & Safety in Law Law) is the cause of sudden ("law worketh wrath") "destruction" of the "no escape" sort coming upon "them": 1Thess 5:3, upon "them all": Lk 17, all them vs them (scape-goats vs dumb-sheep) who know not the second(law: sin) is like the first(law:sin) in Mt 22:36-40's law law, and thereby in Rom 8:2's law law since the first(law) is "sin and death", the 2nd sin(law) is also sin "and" death, as deadly as the first law(sin) iff death thereof is not death unto the law to become alive unto God rather than death by the law. For sin(law), when "it is finished", brings forth death: James 1:15. The wages of sin(law) is death: Romans 6:23. Law(sin) is both the ministration of condemnation and the ministration of death: 2Corinthians 3:7,9. Yet note "adult"-ery is about adults; and it's only the "man" part of child/man that's "not justified by the law" in the sight of God: Galatians 3. Law of law/grace is the childish part of child/man, servant part of slave/free. A child differeth nothing from a servant as long as he remaineth a child: Gal 4:1. But when Paul became a man, he notably put away childish things, such as law(sin) law(sin).

So in saying there is a sin unto death & a sin not unto death, in which things(2 sons of Abraham by 2 mothers are 2 covenants) are an allegory, it's "as" if allegorically saying there is a law unto death & a law not unto death. And in saying "law", which is "sin", it's on the lower(natural) compare-i-son level of them vs them, law vs law, sin vs sin, children vs children, servants vs servants. Whereas "above a servant" is what's truly free of law(sin). Above such law law compare-i-son of Son of man vs Son of God on high in plural divided heavens is the higher exhortation from heaven above to mark & avoid them which cause division: Rom 16:17, "come out from among them": 2Cor 6:17, "mind not high things": Rom 12:16, "be not high-minded": Rom 11:20 & 1Tim 6:17 since "high-minded" is among "unholy" things: 2Tim 3, so "be no more children", to be "no more a servant(slave)" to law(sin thereof, death rider thereof, with hell to pay following such a rider obviously rode in on a horse allegorically called law). So be ye as perfect: Mt 5:48 (also merciful: Lk 6:36) as your Father in "heaven" ("higher than the heavens") is, and as perfect as the perfect man Christ(the end of the law) is, who notably "ascended far above the (law law) heavens" to appear to "God in heaven" for "us".

It's allegoric "mystery" with the over-all more-all "grace is sufficient"(no law req'd). So "go(depart) ye(do err) and learn"(from scriptures "written aforetime for our learning"); "learn what meaneth I will have mercy, and not sacrifice"... "go(learn) and sin(law) no more": Jn 8:11. For by such law law, you're damned if you do it & damned if you don't do it all, all of the time.

"All unrighteousness is sin": 1John 5:17. So all law is sin; For "where no law", there no transgression: Romans 4:15 and "when no law", then no sin imputed: Romans 5:13. So law is the root source of "sin(law) is the transgression of the law"; For "whosoever commiteth sin transgresseth also the law": 1Jn 3:4. Where & when no law(sin)? In Christ: "the end of the law": Romans 10:4. Also in "the end" we're told to endure unto, to be saved(only) by grace(only), since those who added law to grace is sufficient, after being saved(delivered) from the law, got both saved and destroyed after (by such grace + law is as life + death): Jude 5.

Try & fail to keep all law all the time is sin(fail-u-are), since if you breach any law it's as if you breached all the law: Gal 3:10; Jam 2:10,11. And if you even go there, you become a debtor to do the whole law: Gal 5:3. So anyone's sin results in all being generationally "accursed": Deut, unto the third and fourth generation: Ex 20, by the "curse of the law", makes sinners all, none righteous, no, not one (we all are one), if any fail to keep all law all the time: a mission impossible. And if law is the "strength" of sin's death sting: 1Cor 15:56; Then law is allegorically the "strong man" to first bind in order to spoil the strong man's house (of law: sin and death) in Mt 12:29. Whatsoever ye bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: .So bind law, and you bind sin and it's death sting (the wages of sin is death: Rom 6:23; for sin, when it is fininished, brings forth death: Jam 1:15). So basically anyone who goes there, to law, becomes debtor to do all the law: Gal 5:3 all the time: Deut, or else such law imputed sin demands the death penalty. So it's damned if you do and damned if you don't. So of laws(ordinances), Paul says: "touch not, taste not, handle it not".

Yet in saying there's a sin unto death and a sin not unto death, we're allegorically saying there's a law(sin) unto death: namely "the law of sin and death", and a law(sin) not unto death: namely "the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus", or the second and better of two laws in Rom 8:2. However in Mt 22: 36-40's law law we're told the second(law) is like the first(law): it's "law"; And "law worketh wrath"(Rom 4:15), which "God hath not appointed us unto"(1Thess 5:9). So we're only talking about the better sin(law) of good/better sins(laws), not about what's best of good/better/best (three things). We're talking of being the better sort of two children: "children of God", instead of "be no more children". We're talking of being the better sort of two servants: "servants of righteousness", instead of "thou art no more servant, but a son". We're talking of being the better sort of two thems, instead of "come out from among them". We're talking of being right of two left/right things on high which are both law(sin), instead of grace that is higher than the (plural and divided) heavens. So we're talking of a fall, from grace, even if the better of two things, which is still not what's best of three things, as grace is. And since grace is neither of two laws(sins), it is by grace ye are saved. Yet it's grace void of law, if led of the Spirit, since "ye are not under law, but under grace, if led of the Spirit". Selah.

So in Christ(is the end of the law: Rom 10:4) there is no sin, because in Christ  there's no law to impute any sin(transgression, trespass). To wit: that God was in "Christ"(the end of the law) reconciling the world unto himself(that God of this/that Gods, the God of all grace, the God of all comfort, the only true God of false/true Gods, the only wise God of foolish/wise Gods, the living God of dead/living Gods, the blessed and only Potentate of such law and grace), NOT imputing their trespasses unto them: 2Cor 5:19. So "that God" is light having no darkness at all (understanding having no ignorance at all) does not nor did not law impute sin, no, not even to "them"(male and female "Adam": Gen 5) who did sin(trespass: go beyond grace is sufficient). Why not? Because law imputed sin makes sinners all, none righteous, no, not one. God is one.

So it reasons God cannot die is allegory for Grace cannot law. It also reasons Christ could not be holden of death, if law is the strength of sin's death sting and Christ(the end of the law) abolished the law, and as if doing the will of God to receive the promise (comes after doing the will of God), the prize, for all, by being first finished a human race all run but one gets the prize.

Two Sons: Son of man vs Son of God

Allegory: The Two Sons of Abraham are The Two Covenants

The "Son of man" is not the "Son of God", for "God is not a man" that he should lie(law) or die(law). So when it comes to the Son "of God", one only, such is not the "first" begotten nor "of the dead", but the "only" begotten and "of the living" God. And God gave His only begotten Son that none should perish. For if even one dies it would be some perish instead of none perish, and if one died for all, then were all dead; which speaks of extinction, not of salvation.


Sons(plural) of God can only occur in heavens(plural) where the "sides" war takes place. Above such, in heaven (higher than the heavens), their are neither sons nor sides to even take, hence no war plausible. Plural "sons" can also speak of plural Fathers, such as the first ascension (of twain ascensions) speaks of ascending to plural Fathers and Gods: my Father "and" your Father, my God "and" your God; whereas the second ascension, to heaven, is notably to appear in the presence of God for us, of them/us; For them speaks of heavens. There are lots of twists in the "mysteries of God", especially near the end; Perhaps even two Lords of the Sabbath: the Son of man notably being Lord "also" of the Sabbath. Yet perhaps such is simply the false of false/true Sabbaths; for the day of God is eternal, not millennial.

Abraham had two sons, by two mothers: these "are the two covenants", and such things are an allegory: Gal 4. But what the script-u-are (of plural and contrary scriptures) saith is: cast out the bondwoman (this Agar = Mt Sinai = law) "and her son" (the result of  law: sin & death). Since such things are an allegory, we're talking His grace does not compromise with law, but rather when grace and truth come law gets "abolished": Eph 2, to the point of "blotting out" ordinances: Clo 2:14, to the point all Mosaic law written in stone and ink is to be "done away": 2Cor 3, to the point what's old, faulty, "ready to vanish": Heb 8:13 "shall vanish": 1Cor 13:8. So, notably in every Pauline Epistle conclusion, including Hebrews & Revelation, there's no mention of law.

Two Spirits: Spirit of Error and Spirit of Truth

In 1John 4: 1-6 two spirits are compared and contrasted: spirit of truth -vs- spirit of error; one of such twain being "of God", the other wise "not of God", but rather of anti-christ, of false prophets, which there are evidently "many" (Mt 24: 4,5; Mk 13: 5,6; 1Jn 4:1) of, and who come in the name of God & Son (grace) and say oxymoronish things like I am + am not (Lk 21:8), or sucker: you too can have partiality with an impartial God, or foolish things such as the 2nd of two comings isn't come.

Evidently Jesus Christ, 2nd of twain Adams (1Cor 15) "is come", "greater" of great & greater prophets/kings (Mt 12: 41/42) "is here". All who think other wise (via devilish wisdom: Jam 3) are "false" prophets, spirits "not of God", but of "anti-christ", which is the Spirit of Error.

    Spirit of Error: The Law (was: given by Moses)... Another Law is as Another Error
    Spirit of Truth: Grace (came: by Jesus Christ)... Only the truth shall make you Free

The spirit of truth is evidently (from the biblical evidence given) also the spirit of grace; Whereas spirits of (ye do) err (not k now ing) stem from satanic ministerial folk still mixing contrary things like grace + law, witch ends badly for "them": their end shall be according to their (grace + law) works (2Cor 11:15); for when they shall say peace & safety, then sudden destruction cometh upon "them" (1Th 5:3), a no escape snare ending as badly as good + evil (Heb 5:14), as blessed + cursed (Jam 3:10), as saved + destroyed (Jude 5), as life + death (Heb 11: 13,29), a dead end all bestial dinosaurs had: "was, and is not".

Two Testaments: NT called "Better Testament"

The most obvious twain of all in the Holy Bible containing Old and New Testaments is the two testaments thereof called old/new. As Hebrews 8:7 notes about such first/second covenants, if the first (old) was faultless (perfect), there would have been no need for the second (new). It is also noteworthy the "two covenants" (testaments) are both "allegory" (Galatians 4). The allegory of such law/grace, via Moses/JC, is: they are compared as if lie/truth: John 1:17.

   Good Testament: Old Testament: Grace is as if dead testator, so the law may be of "force"
   Better Testatment: New Testament: Law is made dead testator, in order to establish grace

The fault (imperfection) of the Old Testament? Evidently "the law" (given by Moses: Jn 1:17) was added to "grace is sufficient" (no law req'd), making an Adamic "transgression": Rom 5:14 by which death came upon all: Rom 5:12; 1Cor 15:22. But "where no law, there no transgression": Rom 4:15. Selah. Then more law was "added" again (Mt Sinai: 10 laws) and again (613 Mosaic laws; torah), and "because of transgressions": Gal 3:19 (to make it more obvious law had been added in first place. For the woman to be "in the transgression": 1Tim 2:14 there obviously had to be a law added (where no law, there no transgression). Selah.

Solomon, in his Ecclesiastes, sums up the grace + law(added) "works" of the Old Testament as being "all vanity and vexation of spirit", noting such plural works are "under the sun": earthy, and by allegorically noting "nothing new under the sun", nothing is made perfect by law added. In comparison and contrast the heavenly (singular) "work" that God sent His Son to do, and which notably got "finished" even before the cross where law got nailed as enmity, is a work of grace only, truth only thereof, the knowing thereof said truth(about the law), making you free, makes you as perfect (Mt 5:48), as merciful (Lk 6:36), as the God of all grace is perfect.

Paul The Apostle sums up the conclusion of the Old Testament as "God(law) concluded them all in unbelief", also sinners all, "none righteous". Problem: if the penalty for sin is death, well, such Old Testament, such Law & Prophets, leaves the reader with a hopeless dead end, fear thereof; and since "fear hath torment", tormented. In comparison and contrast, we find that God ("the God of all grace") was in Christ ("the end of the law") reconciling the world unto himself, and notably by "not imputing their trespasses unto them".

Of good/better things, the New Testament is called a "better testament" notably also having a "better hope" of all living happily ever after via a better spokesman, namely Jesus Christ, by which came grace and truth, in comparison and contrast to the law and lie given by Moses. And the better testament ends with his angel playing the last trump it of twain so none perish.

Two Testators: Make The Law Dead Testator of NT

In Hebrews 9, one of the most difficult things I've ever tried to get any Christians, especially ministers thereof, to either see, acknowledge, or understand, is the simple fact there are twain testators, one for each testament; And the testator of the will of God is neither God (who cannot die) nor JC (who could not be holden of death). A testator has to die, stay dead, for a testament to be of any "force", anyone to get their inheritance; else stuck in probate. It says in


Ok, two testaments, so two testators. But only one will of God, immutable x 2, and the same will in both old and new testaments; and by two immutable things, the first allegorically being: God cannot lie(law): "I will have mercy, and not sacrifice" (Ps 40:6; Hos 6:6; Mt 9:13 ... with a go figure what such meaneth). It meaneth I will have grace, and not law. Heb 10 pretty much clarifies God took no pleasure, none, in any offering or sacrifice, which is "of the law"; and "in him there is no sin"; and whatsoever is not of faith is sin"; and the law is not of faith; so it computes all the way through the Bible. So, for law to be of any force, grace had to be testator of the Old Testament. And for grace to be of any force at all, law has to be testator of the New Testament. It computes, for as Paul clarifies, if you add any law to grace, then grace no more grace. As a little leaven leavens the whole lump, a little law laws the whole grace of God. Paul says it frustrates the grace of God. Law had an expiry date, expired long ago.

In the final analysis there is no law, only grace, which is, is the eternal king in 1Tim 1:17, the only wise God. Wisdom from above: Grace unto you... from God our Father. Grace is, on a throne of "grace", as what your head is crowned with when you embrace understanding in Prov 4. And such is to be firstly pure, then peace-able in James 3. But for the sake of the shew , we have two testators, and when law added in Gen 2:17 it made for transgression, going beyond grace is sufficient, to an oxymoron, a paradoxical war, the result being grace + law = life + death = dead end. And such produced fear (deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage: Heb 2:15). And fear hath torment, which is why, the because, God (perfect love) casts out fear; which is also allegorical for casting out the law. Gal 4 reveals the script u are saith: cast out the woman (this Agar = Mt Sinai = the law) and her son (result of the law: sin and death, fear of death, torment).

In the New Testament we have a testator, law, which got a deadly wound at the cross, nailed (Col 2:14) for being against us, abolished (Eph 2:15) for being enmity; done away (2Cor 3) for being a ministration of condemnation and death; for that which is in part (the counter part of grace) is to be done away when that which is perfect is come. JC is come, so law ought be done away (1Cor 13). Law is old, faulty, ready to vanish (Heb 8:13), and shall vanish (1Cor 13:8). Poof goes the dragon, a flame out. It was only a Phantom menace, a Ghost law, or as Heb 10 calls it a "shadow" of things to come, not the very(true) things. Yeah though I walk through the valley of the "shadow" of death, I will fear no evil (law). It's an allegory, with a moral, also a mystery played out as a shew, "written aforetime for our learning" (Rom 15:4).


Problem is, Christians and ministers thereof keep reviving the law off the cross, where it was nailed as the curse (of the law); so what was, is not, in Revelation, becomes was, and is not, yet is. And as l-o-n-g as such a beast yet is, it manifests all sorts of wrath (law worketh wrath: Rom 4), as if getting shit on from above. The wrath of God, is simply return to sender of any law sent His way via praying amiss, for as the God of all grace, His opinion of law is: none for me thanks. It behooves us all to probate the will of God, see there are two testators, and law has to die for all to have eternal life.

Two Thems:  Them vs Them  who "Oppose Them-selves"

In Hebrews 10:39 Paul mentions two sorts of "them" (see below). Yet Jesus Christ, Paul, and Peter all clarify it is not them-ward (neither sort of two thems) the Lord is long-suffering unto, but rather unto "us" of "us-ward"; For God hath given "us" the victory through Jesus -> Christ: the end of the law for righteousness (of such lefteousness & righteousness of them vs them). God also declared the end from the beginning saying Let us (not them) make man (not child). So the higher exhortation (up lifting from above), of being edified (built up from the foundation) to be the better sort of two thems is: come out from among "them"; and search the scriptures, for in "them" (in "Adam": Gen 5:2, in "created" of created and made things) ye think ye have eternal life. Evidently not, for there's only temporal life in them, even in the better sort of thems.

In the same manner Paul distinguishes two servants in Rom 6; But later clarifies "thou art no more servant" (neither of two sorts) in Gal 4. He also distinguishes two laws in Rom 7 & 8; But later clarifies "ye are not under the law" (neither of two sorts), but under grace. He also distinguishes two children in Rom 9 (from Mt 13); But later clarifies "put away childish things" and "be no more children" (neither of two sorts). Allegorically such twain are as two ways mentioned in Mt 7; But the third way called "more excellent way" is neither the broad nor narrow ways, just as "charity" is clarified as the "greatest" of "three things", which is neither great nor greater. The third way is also called the "new and living way"; For even the narrow only "leadeth unto life" as the new of old/new ways; Just as greater of great/greater things "leadeth unto" what's "greatest" of "three things". So also the "us" of "us-ward" is just us: neither of two thems, as man of 1Cor 13:11 is neither sort of child in Mt 13 and Rom 9, and the "grace" of Jesus->Christ and "charity never faileth" is neither sort of two laws in Rom 7 & 8:

3. Us-ward: Neither of thems; Yet "of them who believe to the saving of the soul".
2. Them: who believe to the saving of the soul... children of God; servants of righteousness;
1. Them: who draw back to perdition ... children of flesh; servants of sin

Both sorts of them are as Cheribums witch overshadow the =>mercy seat<= from both ends; and thereby both ends are as a childish latter end worse, due to both sorts of children and servants being law law: whether law -> law or law <- law, either way it's a latter end worse. And when it comes to the left/right sides of the divided (against itself) kingdom of Son of Man; Well the Son of Man has a surprise ending for "them all" (both sorts of them): "destruction".

Such "no escape" sort of "destruction" is described in places like Lk 17:27-30 and 1Thes 5:3. For both sorts of them (goats and sheep) "oppose themselves" in a blame game witch inducts all of them, whether left or right in such a sides war, into the hALL of shame, via such childish law<=>law going both ways of broad and narrow ways. So the higher exhortation of heaven (higher than the heavens) is to "come out from among them", and "search the scriptures for in them (in Adam, the created of created and made) ye think ye have eternal life"... evidently not. For "as in Adam (in them) all die" from a bad case of grace + law = life + death = dead end.

Two Trees in the Garden: Life or Death

In Genesis 2 there is a tree of  life and a tree of death, one being good for food, the other only pleasant to look at; for in the day that thou eastest thereof thou shalt surely die. The tree of knowledge of good + evil obviously has a bad ending: evil, so it reasons we ought not go there, not even to the good, if such good + evil ends with evil, such as evil concupiscence , the curse thereof, fear thereof, torment thereof; nor the sin thereof, sting thereof, dead end thereof. JC said God said:

Either make the tree good, and his fruit good; or make the tree corrupt, and his fruit corrupt (Matthew 12). Either make the tree grace(good only) or law(evil: corrupt: both good and evil).

Twain trees are also talked about in connection with twain ways in Matthew 7. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit and an evil tree cannot bring forth good fruit. He is talking about grace and law being contrary things, not being able to co-exist, at least not in peace. Hence Shakespeare said: to be or not to be, that is the question; which is a matter of life or death, not life + death. Hence, as Jesus taught, it's grace or law, not both, for they do not mix except as life + death, witch is a dead end, which the Bible does not have.

Two Trumps: the trump of God: Law & the last trump: Grace

If there is a "last trump" mentioned in the Bible, it allegorically denotes there is also a first trump to look for and compare; in the same manner as when the only wise God mentioned, there must also be a foolish God to look for and compare foolish/wise Gods, false/true Gods. This concept seems to reveal two mentions of trump: "the trump of God" in 1Thessalonians 4:16 and "the last trump" in 1Corinthians 15:52. But a study seems to also reveal the trump of God is Law, and the last trump is Grace, when giving more earnest heed to what's said about each; As if the trump of God is the first trump of first trump/last trump in a before/after shew.

Not obvious to many,  the last trump of two trumps is NOT called a trumpet, but rather called a "trump": 1Cor 15:52. Likewise the "trump of God" in 1Thes 4:16 is not a trumpet. In the verses mentioning the last trump, both trump and trumpet are used. So we should not assume the last trump is any shofar or any trumpet sounding any uncertain sound. Rather the last trump is allegory for the conclusion of every Pauline epistle, which is also the conclusion of Revelation, which concludes the New Testament and the Holy Bible containing Old & New Testaments. So the last trump is: The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ with you all. Amen.

Even less obvious to many is the biblical fact the word "and" occurs often in scriptures, implying two things are being allegorically shewn, for comparison, as the Bible is a comparative teaching about what grace is, in comparison to what it's not: law; kinda like a before/after shew of old/new testaments, each having a (dead) testator thereof; Yet so much more, for it's a two part shew about a third part: what's best, of good better best, for all.

                        Two Trumps: uncertain trump et should not be given "Amen":
                        First Trump et: The Law "was": notably "against" us all. No Amen!
                        Last Trump it: His Grace "is": "with you all". "Amen" (to "that" only)!

In such a before/after shew of law/grace in such old/new testaments, law was allowed to go first, yet when in the new testament of such old/new things, it's what's behind you of ye/you, pure grace being what's up front, as the very (true) thing to come of false/true things to come. So the two trumps are allegorically law/grace, the last trump it being played by Paul: his witness unto all men, yet also faithful steward of the mysteries of God, his angel: Revelation 1.

See the related web page: Paul The Apostle Plays The Last Trump It in every Pauline Epistle.