1Peter 4: 14 their part / your part:
on their part he is evil spoken of,
but on your part he is glorified.

Two divisional parts: their part (autos: bafflng bwd wind) and your part (humas: you) are mentioned in 1Peter 4:14. At first glance "your part" seems the better part of two parts; Especially when looking at the consequence of playing their part mentioned in Revelation 21:8: "shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death"... Perhaps the portion of "their cup" in Psalms 11:6 "Upon the wicked he shall rain snares, fire and brimstone, and an horrible tempest: [this shall be] the portion of their cup"... Perhaps their end which shall be according to "their works" mentioned about ministers of Satan in 2Corinthians 11:15. But when going on unto perfection, neither part of any sides war is considered perfect, rather part-iality. Paul says when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away. To me this is doing away with both sides of any and all sides war, such as Law vs Law and Law vs Grace, by doing away with the contrary part: Law, as if doing away with the childish part of child/man to be man kind, the better of two one man vs one man scenarios noted in Romans 5.

God said let us make man. Paul said David spoke of "the blessedness of man" as "blessed the man to whom the Lord will not impute sin": Psalms 32:2; Romans 4:8. Paul said when I became a man I put away childish things: 1Corinthians 13. Paul also concluded what's evident from the evidence is that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God: Galatians 3:12, since the law is not of faith: Galatians 3:11. Paul also noted in Romans 2 that a man who judges others by law is inexcusable and self condemned by law does not excuse those who accuse others; John the Baptist being an example. So the man kind that God said let us make, is to be grace us, not awful lawful.

Such mention of two parts in 1Peter notably occurs in the second of three sections of 1Peter having three "Amen"s. So only the last Amen of 1Peter goes to being made perfect by the God of all grace; But such 1Peter 5:10 "perfect" is not the 'telios' sort "perfect" of Matthew 5:48 and 1Corinthians 13:10, rather the 'katartizo' sort; Perhaps due to Peter's audience being brethren in CJ rather than JC. Be ye "perfect" as God is in Matthew 5:48 is further clarified by be ye "also merciful" as God is in Luke 6:36; And when our going on unto perfection is also merciful, then we'll be more likely to put away the part-iality sides war of two parts, for the third of three things, as what's best for all, not good nor better for some. For 1Corinthians 13 is about a "more excellent way" than broad vs narrow ways: "charity never faileth", because "charity thinketh no evil" is the greatest of three things which is neither great nor greater; And in 1Corinthians 13:10 Paul notes when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away. To me it speaks of put away divisional part-iality for unity of the Spirit. Us-ward seems to be neither part of them vs them, even though we are of the better of two thems who oppose themselves. James 3:17 also notes firstly pure wisdom from above (Grace unto you from God) has seven aspects, the sixth being "without part-iality", or without part, but whole.


Now it came to pass, as they went, that he entered into a certain village: and a certain woman named Martha received him into her house. And she had a sister called Mary, which also sat at Jesus' feet, and heard his word. But Martha was cumbered about much serving, and came to him, and said, Lord, dost thou not care that my sister hath left me to serve alone? bid her therefore that she help me. And Jesus answered and said unto her, Martha, Martha, thou art careful and troubled about many things: But one thing is needful: and Mary hath chosen that good part, which shall not be taken away from her.


Biblical mention is also made of "the contrary part" (enantios: the before part that's opposite or against) in Titus 2:8; And of "that good part" (meris: a part distinct from the whole) in Luke 10:42. The contrary part being blotted out to the point it vanishes like the moon at the coming of the sun seems to be law in Colossians 2:14, which notes law was "against us" and was "contrary to us". For although both are contrary one to another in law vs grace, it is only law that is against us, grace being with you all: you and all the KofG within you. So it says in Mark 9:40 he that is not against us is on our part; And again in Luke 9:50 Forbid(Law) not, for he that is not against us is for us. Grace God may be with us, never against us; But His Grace does not make sides and take a side, since there is no respect of persons with God, no part-iality whatsoever. So let us consider any God that makes or takes sides is not Grace, but Law. Grace neither tempts nor can be tempted. Thereby Grace cannot lie nor die.

The contrary part is like the oft mention of a contrary wind, which is what's noted about their part: autos: a baffling backward wind. Winds can also mean spirits in biblical allegory, children being tossed to and from by winds (spirits) of doctrine; so we're also talking spiritual people being contrary to spiritual people. Law is natural and spiritual, but natural disaster as law worketh wrath and spiritual abuse as legalism; perversion rather than conversion in the new part of old/new. Christ is the end of the law: Romans 10:4; And not the mend of law: Luke 5:36,37. So let us not get involved in matters of law vs law, which is as loser vs loser, as every way you look at law you lose; since it's divided against itself. Even in the case of law vs grace debate the tricky part is to make him on the contrary part ashamed without condemning yourself in the process; as noted in Titus 2:8. Paul seems to have mastered this by using an epistle format that opens and closes with grace, having a scriptural discussion of law vs grace sandwiched between it that both reveals and deceives, since Paul is also a faithful steward of the mysteries of God as well as a revealer of an abundance of revelations.

Two parts are notably played by "Jesus" in a "verily verily" gospel of John: Son of man and Son of God. Hence there are two resurrections mentioned: one of damnation and one of life. Allegorically the two parts are law and grace.


So it's clarified that eternal salvation is "through Jesus-->Christ", not in Jesus.
Jesus: was made under the law, and of woman (woman was 1st in the transgression)
Christ: the end of the law (where no law, there no transgression; in him no law = no sin)
So it's clarified reconciling the world to God is done "in Christ", by "that God"

We aren't the body of Jesus (ye are not under the law): we do not play the contrary part
We are the body of "Christ" (but ye are under grace): we play y(our) part of two parts

Salvation(eternal sort, eternal life thereof) isn't through Christ Jesus ends with Jesus.
Salvation(eternal sort, eternal life thereof) is through Jesus Christ ends with "Christ".

No matter how their part <--vs--> your part gets allegorized in "which things are an allegory" it's always two parts: Moses: law & lie <--vs--> JC: grace & truth;
        - (merciless) Holy Ghost vs (merciful) Holy Spirit
        - Two foolish/wise Gods  opposed about "them" all
        - Two false/true Spirits(Gods)  to try(test: which is witch)
        - Two "one man" scenarios, resulting in life or death to all
        - Prophecy vs Prophesy: is as to Gloom vs Groom
        - Puffed up with law law vs Edified up with grace & truth
        - etc, etc... ample biblical & historical evidence... full proof
          to the point "you", "your part" to play, is fool (viper) proof;
          For you will be tested, till you display "holiness with sobriety",
          not another (drink of deadly) law for you, all the KoG within you.


Their part: war, warfare, fighting, division, go  to<-->fro  with  law<-->law
Your part: what war or fight if he is our peace, let's go on --> unto perfection

The contrary part: earthy sensual and devilish wisdom ... first + last impure
Wisdom from above: Grace unto you, from God our Father... is firstly pure

Their part: God is "evil" spoken of (His Grace is "law" spoken of)... by many
Your part: let he on the contrary part be ashamed (God is glorified)... by few


Pauline clarity about how you should play y(our) part: use sound speech that cannot be condemned [lawed] nor evil [law] spoken of, such that he that is of the contrary part may be ashamed; and do it without condemning yourself. Tricky but doable. Doable by opening and closing discussion with the grace of God & Son as Paul: his witness unto all men, does in every epistle except his epistle To The Hebrews, which is a mini bible itself, having the same theme and conclusion as Holy Bible containing Old & New Testaments. Theme: Plural God(s) hath both spake and spoken, to them and us, law and grace. Conclusion: Grace with you all. Amen. (has no mention of law: sin & death to anyone).


Head(Greeting): Grace unto you,  and peace, from God our Father  and the Lord Jesus Christ.
Body (Discussion): look at both sides of the sides war, side effects thereof such a blame game
Foot(Salutation):The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ with you all. Amen. (token in every epistle)

Paul The Apostle, as "his witness to all men" whom God our Saviour will have both saved(delivered) and aware of what they're saved from uses a unique biblical format in his spittle's (not letters, for the letter killeth); opens and closes his discussions of law vs grace in which he gives biblical evidence for both sides, until it comes to 'conclusion' time, which goes to "grace" only.

The Apostle Paul, as "his angel" (who gets to play the last trump it in Revelation) uses his "salutation", the "token in every epistle", written by his own hand, to end the Holy Bible, New Testament thereof, Revelations shewdown thereof. As such, the end having no law = no sin = no dead end, is already written, and notably written by the hand of Paul (as noted thrice in Pauline epistles). Hence it is not a matter of how it turns out, no, not if the end is already written, and in accordance with the end God declared from the beginning, in accordance with the end that's even predestinated from before the foundation of the world.

So, it's not a matter of how the God Shew, shewdown thereof, turns out; No, Rather it's a matter of how well you play your part of their part vs y(our) part. Can you be deceived, tempted, bewitched, snared, fooled, carried away, etc? Heaven wants to know, for heaven does not want any cancer-us law to enter, lest it kill all therein the heavenly body of Christ, including his head [is] God. So your part is not only what's right of left vs right, but being seated right with Christ to make all right rather than wanting to be right to make others wrong; For giving place to wrong is as giving place to devil law: sin and death... to all. Your part of their part vs your part is first be seated with C of JC, then go on unto perfection, above such left vs right, where it's all right and no left(behind).



Pope John-Paul II: "the long tradition of sacrifice must continue in the third millennium (1999 'quote').
JC said God said: "I will have mercy, and not sacrifice" (Hos 6:6 given them as a go figure in Mt 9:13).

President George Bush II: "there will be sacrifice" (2001 'quote', following the 9/11 tragedy).
JC said God said: "I will have mercy(grace), and not sacrifice(law)"; Love (not kill) your enemy.

Jack Van Impe (Jack, of the 'Impe' family) says: "the time (for Armageddon, Son of man) draweth near".
Luke said: deceivers shall come saying I am; and "the time draweth near": go ye not therefore after them.

Kenneth Copeland: I know nothing about Revelation, except I get Rev 1:3 "blessed" reading it.
Daniel Miles: those who get law 'blessed' by reading of fellow brethren getting killed are $ick.

G Bush II: now that I have a mandate for a second term, I'll take my rule of law global in next four yrs.
The Apostle Paul: ye are not under the law, but under grace. Whether prophecies, they shall fail.