Many religious web sites have FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions); Most of it made up stuff people haven't even asked. Some won't even list, let alone answer questions I've asked, and frequently. Many still don't know the difference between a biblical statement: "I will" and a question: "will I"; Which may also be the difference between certain existence: I am and uncertain existence: am I. I've listed some SAQs (Seldom Asked Questions) for us to ponder and answer: shall all? will I? shalt thou? shall be? will he? ... notably worded as questions unaware sheeple think are statements.

"For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive"?
(1Corinthians 15:22 KJV)

Answer: Yes. Why? If not all, none at all, for "there is no respect of persons with God". Evangelastic lie: 'you too can have partiality with an impartial God' is both an oxymoron, and a lie. The answer is further clarified in another of Paul's writings: "For God concluded them all in unbelief that he might have mercy upon all" (Romans 11:32). Therein we have two alls: them all and us all. Either way, of law: sinners all = all die -or- grace: sinners none = none perish, of such allegoric them/us, it's "all", not some only. All is neither many nor few, and not somewhat, I know not what. In like manner more excellent is neither broad nor narrow minded, but Christ minded.

Evidently, from the biblical evidence of forty witnesses giving testimony (evidence) over 1,600 yrs (estimated time of writing the Bible), we're all in the same boat (fellow ship) together: we all are one. But it's not the Titanic, so there is no need to Panic. Worry tends to back-fire, and fear hath torment. Nor are we all one proselyte: twofold: more the child of hell; But rather one man kind, the better one of one man vs one man in Romans 5. For by one man death came upon all (even upon those who did not sin after the similitude of Adam), and by one man there is life unto all; Yet two alls is one two many alls, so let us have only one all: us all (not them all), just us of us-ward. For bad things happen to them, and Son of Man has one thing planned for them all: destruction, no matter which of them vs them, who oppose themselves with law vs law, is as loser vs loser.

Hebrews 2 clearly states we are "brethren" all. We are all one in Christ: is the end of the law. In him there is no law = no sin = no condemnation, and therefore no deadly sting (1Cor 15:56) of sin. And to be "made alive" is biblically defined as die to the law to become alive unto God (Grace), which is take away the first (law) to establish the second (grace).

    The law was given by Moses,
    but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.

    He taketh away the first,
    that he may establish the second.

    Law: press Delete to take away.
    Grace: press Save to establish.

Many are still trying, also failing, to establish grace without taking away law; Not letting law be the dead testator (Heb 9: 16) it is intended to be in the new (better) testament, then wondering why they have terminal health problems similar to the infirmities of law priests in Hebrews 7:23, who mixed grace + law and it turned out to be life + death, a dead end for them: not suffered to continue by reason of death. That's why the Lord (now "that Spirit") is long-suffering to "us-ward", the just us thereof all being one: us. For God is one slice, not twain as many ye do err ass u me in ignorance.

It's also stated by Paul: his witness unto all men, that "we shall not all sleep (die), but we shall all be changed" (1Cor 15:51); We all are changed (2Cor 3:18), from glory to glory; further allegorically explained in Heb 1:12 as "fold them up", them the unreal of unreal/real them/us: mirrorly the counter part  in the shew, of scriptures (plural) "written aforetime for our learning", which is a twain shew about this/that and a God shew about good better best; not to mention it's a triple mystery in Col 2:2, to be solved "in time" (neither mystery nor time in eternity)... the point being to know what saith the the script-u-are of such (law vs grace) scriptures.

But not all are aware of it, yet. Hence global awareness (get understanding) is the only goal of Godshew.org. For to stonewall probate of the will of God, inheritance thereof to "all", is not only suicide-all, but utter folly, for the will of God not just immutable, but immutable x 2. And if ye are thinking other wise, well then: ye can bend over and kiss your divided ass bye bye. For no amount of lying, or crying, or dying will ever change the "immutable" will of God to have mercy, and not sacrifice; which is to say have grace, and not law; which is to say have life, and not death.

Selah America.

Answer: Prior to looking at the second part of Exodus 3: 14 y'all may want to look at an interesting aspect of the first part in ShewBread under the sub title: I AM "THAT" I AM; for of this and that things given as allegorical mystery to solve in time, rather this or that, false or true, the real God is "that God" (1John 1:5), as the second or last Adam is the Lord from heaven, the other also a Lord in Genesis 4:1, but not the Lord from heaven when comparing Adams. Such things are an allegory (Galatians 4), and such twain things being allegorically compared are primarily grace and law, which are allegorically as life and death, blessed and cursed, saved and destroyed, etc. And if you don't get it right away, perhaps think such is an evangelastic stretch of my imagination, give it some time to compute, and ask God per James 1 for wisdom, do it nothing wavering, and you'll eventually get it: understanding = grace glory, see it, and say aha, as I did when I eventually saw it.

Answer: No! The chapter starts off with JC clarifying to his disciples not one stone (law) shall be left standing of such a (law) temple the disciples found so appealing. The chapter also continues with an exhortation: "take heed that no man deceive you", denoting many shall, and shall do sow coming in his name (grace), and by saying what he said they would say in Lk 21:8. And then he goes on to talk of "ye" stuff (but denoted "ye do err" in another place). And then he asks the question: then shall be great tribulation?  But he also explains his view: neither the law, nor "great" tribulation thereof ever was: "not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be". In other words, give no place to the devil , none! For where no law, there no transgression (Rom 4); when no law, sin not even imputed (Rom 5); and against the fruit of the Spirit there is no law (Gal 5). In him there is no sin: no law, no place for sin, no sting of sin either.  Hence in him we ought also to give no place to the law nor great tribulation thereof (Eph 4:27): be angry: yes, sin: not, neither give place to the devil (law); lest it manifest "great" tribulation. So, as far as JC said God said: the law, great tribulation thereof, was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be. Such giving no place to the devil concurs with God's will: "I will have mercy, and not sacrifice", which is: immutable x 2 , and such will, "by the which will we are sanctified", gives sacrifice  no place at all. Selah.