|
Grace unto you, and
peace,
from God
our (merciful) Father and the Lord Jesus Christ
What will it be for you all
(for
you and all the KofG within you)?
2nd Finished
(at the cross) or 1st Finished
(before the cross)
Latter End:
"Worse" (LAW<--Law)
-or-
"Better"
(grace)?
Vengeance is
mine, I will repay -or- Perfect, also merciful?
Sacrifice or Mercy?
Law
or Grace?
Love or Charity?
Destruction
or Salvation?
Both
Law God & Grace God expect y(our) decision!
It is already the third
day: last day:
beyond 2000AD.
Humpty Dumpty fence
sitting time has
now expired.
It's now Revelation Shewdown time:
Law or Grace?
Both Grace + Law an oxyMORON
with a BAD
end.
So then Luke-warm won't do. Either be Hot or Cold.
2011 Easter Sermon 2011 Easter Message
2011
1John 1:5
This then is the message which
we have heard of him, and declare unto you,
that God is light, and
in him is no
darkness at all.
2010 Easter Message 2010 is even
more important than the messenger.
Be ye reconciled
(through Jesus --> Christ) --> to
God: 2Cor 5
The Message is: that
God is light,
and in him there is no darkness
at all.
Reconciling
the world is to "that God", and
it's done "in Christ": 2Cor 5:19.
Reconciled is neither to two Sons Jesus nor to false/true Christs, but
"to God",
more specifically by and unto "that God" was in "Christ"
reconciling the world;
As if exhorting,
from above, to
go on unto perfection,
is "also merciful"
up higher.
For even when being right of laws vs grace on high it's still division and not peace.
So let's rightly
divide the word of truth to approved(only) unto God and unashamed.
To many still hung up on the cross (both dead and living sacrifices
thereof) be it known the will of God that Jesus Christ is
come to do ("Lo, I come to do thy will O
God"; "thy will be done on
earth as it is in heaven"; "not my will but thine be done"), was
"finished" before the cross
("I have finished the work
which thou gavest
me to do": John 17). The will of God, concerning law or grace
(sacrifice or mercy), is also quite often made known:
1 - by David in Psalms 40:6; 51:16 "Sacrifice and offering (for sin) thou didst not desire..."
2 - by Hosea in Hosea 6:6 "I desire
mercy, and not sacrifice" (in
context with "third day")
3 - by Jesus Christ in Matthew 9:13: "I
will
have mercy, and not sacrifice"
(as a go figure)
4 - by J C in Matthew 12:7 If you k-new
what it means, you wouldn't have lawed
the grace
5 - by Paul The Apostle in Hebrews 10:
do the will of God precedes
receive the promise
after
And the "mystery" (allegory) of his will
(what meaneth "I
will have mercy, and not sacrifice") is also "made known" unto
"us" by Paul The Apostle ("his
witness unto all
men"), as noted in Ephesians 1:9. For when we go figure what (such things are an allegory)
meaneth "I will have mercy, and not sacrifice" via "seek and ye shall
find", we "find grace" (Hebrews
4:16) "in time" to "help" get understanding, and thereby learn only
"mercy" (not sacrifice nor both mercy + sacrifice) is the only thing
obtain-able at the "throne of
grace". Ye also find
(in Hebrews 10) it
("I will have mercy, and not sacrifice") meaneth I will have grace, and
not law. For therein Paul reveals sacrifice and offering (for sin) is
"by the law"
(only law imputes sin, demands sacrifice), and "the law is
not of faith" (Galatians 3:11), and whatsoever is not of faith is sin
(Romans 14:23). So if the law is not of faith, and whatever is not of
faith is sin, and the wages of sin is death, then it becomes obvious
(evident from the evidence) why no man (of child/man) is justified by
the law in the sight of God. It also reasons "that God" (is
light and in him there is no
darkness at all) who was in Christ (of
Jesus --> Christ) reconciling
the world unto himself (not imputing sin: 2Corinthians 5:19), is
obviously "the
God of all grace"
(no law), "the only
wise God" (of foolish/wise
Gods),
"the only
true God" (of false/true
Gods), who will not have law. His Grace will not
have any law at all; And the not part of what God will and will not
have is not then, not now, not ever.
All law, whether written in stone or in ink, is to be "done away" (1Corinthians
13; 2Cor 3), "abolished"
(Ephesians 2), "blotted out"
(Colossians 2), "put away"
(Ephesians 4) as the "put
off" (Colossians 3); And notably putting off the old (law) prior
to
putting on the new (grace) since such contrary things cannot coexist in
peace. Contrary things should not be mingled, but compared, and one
flushed as dung after doing the allegoric compare-i-son. For he is our
peace who hath abolished the law (Ephesians 2). For of
first/second things, the law was given by Moses, but grace came by
Jesus Christ; and are notably compared as lie (law) vs truth (grace) in
John 1:17. So we are told that "he taketh away
the first, that he may establish the second" (Hebrews 10); Since
the
mixture would be an oxymoronic paradox with a bad ending such as
life (grace) + death (law) = a dead end. For when studied out, the only
plausible mixture of grace is, law added, is grace + law: life + death.
So we find harmful Genesis 2:17 Law added to harmless Genesis 2:16
Grace is a transgression.
But where no law,
there no transgression:
Romans 4:15 also tells us why we should have no law at all, because law worketh wrath is
destructive, not constructive. Grace is constructive, not destructive.
So there's no peace in law, nor true and lasting peace in grace + law
or grace vs law, but only true peace in Grace lasts for an eternity;
But notably the peace of higher Grace of lower grace or higher Grace, two different
graces of Noah and of Jesus Christ. The grace Noah found in
the eyes of the LAW only saved, and later also destroyed eight souls.
For Noah is notably listed in the Hebrews 11 hall of shame (not
fame): these all died and received not the promise. Selah.
For if grace "is", and law "was", and was "added", the only
plausible combo is
grace + law, which is as blessed + cursed = "accursed"... "another
gospel" (Galatians 1:9) than "the gospel of Christ": "the end of the law":
our peace; A perverted gospel such as "this gospel" of this/that
gospels, which is
notably the beginning of begin/end, and notably the beginning of (global)
sorrows in Mt 24. Hence only "that gospel" (of this/that gospels)
also going
global brings the
end of sorrows (laws). For only what began can end. Law began
twice, 1st as beginning of knowledge & wisdom = fear, then as
beginning of sorrows. Eternal Grace has no beginning nor end, neither a
beginning of days nor an end of life. So we endure unto the end to saved
(only), which is notably the end of law. Else many other ways to be
saved can also end saved + destroyed after, due to grace + law afterward.
Furthermore what
God will not have (law) is notably not then, not now, not ever.
It's
"immutable"! And what God will have:
all men saved AND aware what they're saved from: law, is not optional
for anyone since "we all are one" and "a little leaven leaveneth the
whole lump"; Not to mention "there is no respect of persons with God"
(no partiality, so whatever applies to any applies to all). John 8:32 is not optional
for anyone, nor is the "kingdom" of God a man-made democracy or some
thing way out there some where; But rather the Kingdm of God is located
"with-in you" as
allegory. For in the Holy Bible (7th Bible) containing
Old and New Testaments, one testament calls itself better,
kinda like verily verily John
calls himself more beloved, but such is only according to John, a know
not servant (John
15:15... Revelation
1:1); And both of two "covenants" are allegory, as noted in
Galatians 4. Within the New of such Old/New is also a more excellent way than
either of Broad/Narrow "ways" = double-minded =
unstable. So let's not stop at better, but leave good/better things
of a Majesty on high = highminded,
to go on unto perfection: the best
of good better best. For concerning eternal life, an "also" used
denotes it's a higher calling than Old/New callings on high; A calling
of that God, of this/that Gods
allegorically portrayed in a God shew (plural of show).
Of two Gods portrayed, only one cannot lie nor die. The other wise
is a counter part
in a comparative teaching,
and such part-iality
is to be done away
after the two Gods
comparison is made, by first doing the plural God compare-i-son noted in the
beginning: Let us make man, has two Before/After options: Before: in
our image: Law, and After: after our likeness: Grace. But higher God
has only one option: Grace with you all. Amen.
God cannot lie (allegoric meaning: Grace
cannot law)
God cannot die (allegory
meaning: Grace cannot law)
God cannot be tempted (meaning: Grace cannot law)
Neither does God tempt (allegory: Grace doesn't law)
God
doesn't compromise! (means Grace doesn't law!)
POINT: Law and Grace are contrary things!
Contary things only mix as an oxyMORON.
Contrary things can't co-exist; Not in peace!
He is our "peace", who hath abolished law
!
The
messenger revealed the Easter message to us by way of an allegoric "shew"
The
messenger's sole purpose, in paying a "visit" (not a
ransom) to all "afflicted" (with a bad case of life + death
= a
dead end), was to "shew" us who the blessed and only
Potentate is,
and notably does it "in his times" (plural: as a
comparative
law/grace teaching). JC simply took such oxymoronic grace +
law (all
vanity and vexation of Spirit) and made such grace + law
"division":
grace or law; Then took both
to the cross and went on through
the cross to risen and
seated (seated
denoting the matter is for ever settled in heaven, finished once and
for all, and finished
before the cross); Leaving
law nailed (Col
2:14) to a
cross: dead tree as the curse
(Gal 3:13), the enmity (Eph
2:15), the liar (Jn 1:17; Jn
8:44), the thief (Jn 10:10),
the accuser
of the brethren (Jn 5:45),
the schoolmaster (Gal 3)
witch failed every student
(Rom 9:31; Jude
5); Such law law
being both a ministration of
condemnation (2Cor 3:9; Rom 8:1) + ministration of death (2Cor
3:7; 1Cor 15:56) to avoid. For
when "it is finished" (Jn 19), it being sin, it bringeth forth "death", not life (Jam
1:15).
Seek
& find the "name of" Jesus Christ (the "grace" of our Lord Jesus
Christ)
which is to say the God that is even more hallowed
than the name "Jesus
Christ".
Go figure (in Matthew 9:13) what meaneth
"I will have mercy, and not sacrifice" later on reveals (in
Hebrews 10) it
meaneth I will have grace, and
not law; For sacrifice,
is "by the law", notably never
gave the only true God (of false/true Gods)
any pleasure whatsoever b/c "by the law"
no man is justified in the sight God. So it reasons no man is justified
by sacrifice in the sight of God. Furthermore the "not sacrifice" (not
law)
part of what
God will have and will not have is
notably not then, not now, not ever; since
God never changes; unless we believe God is both merciless law and
merciful grace, which would make God an oxy-moron: the mingle of
contrary things. Rather it's we all who must chanGe, are (being) changed (as by
the Spirit), from
glory to glory. For God did not send his Son to condemn (law) the
world, not this, but that: through him (thru J-->C) the world might
be saved (graced AND truthed). So God's Son would not receive (drink)
the mingled drink offered:
Matthew 27:34; Mark 15:23; Luke 13:1-3. He would not drink (receive)
mingled grace + law, because grace + law is as blessed + cursed =
accursed, is as life + death = a dead end.
Law
and grace (sacrifice and mercy) cannot coexist
in peace.
What His Grace (King immortal and in-visible)
shall have
is peace (rest), and by abolition
of law. Eg: "your covenant with death
[sacrifice] shall be disannulled,
and your agreement with hell shall
not stand":
Isaiah. So John the Baptist was both the spirit of Elijah (zealous
about law), and also the voice of Isaiah (zealous about
grace). As the spirit of Elijah he says "Behold the lamb of God" about two Sons Jesus
being amnos +
arnion lamb of grace + law God on high had them/us partiality; But
as the voice of Isaiah says "Behold
the lamb of God which taketh away
the sin of the world"
about one Son Christ being the only Son of the higher merciful God who
has no partiality. And it's abolition of all law
written in stone and in ink, to the point
all Revelation 13 LAW
<-- Law
gets blotted out:
Colossians 2:14 to the point of vanish. For it
is written that what's "ready to vanish": Hebrews 8:13 and because it's
"old",
and thereby not faultless (it can never make comers perfect: Hebrews
10); So it "shall vanish": 1Corinthians 13:8. Selah.
So then both
- deceased Pope John-Paul
II's "sacrifice must continue in the third millennium" at Y2K
- and former POTUS GWB II's "there will be
sacrifice" at 9/11
were a covenant with death
and an agreement with hell
that shall be disanulled
and shall not stand.
For the Bible says that God will
have mercy only, and for all, and God will not have sacrifice,
ever.
Sow: if it (law: sacrifice) is
"dung", then flush it!
Christ did:
Ephesians 2:15, and because Christ abolished the law from
his flesh, Christ is our peace (for we are his flesh: Eph 5:30). On the
contrary part, we find there was
division, and there shall be
wailing "because of him"
x2: because of Jesus who brought swordy division, not peace: Mt 10:34:
Lk 12:51, and because Jesus did not give them rest (peace): Heb 4:8. So
let us not look for a second coming of Jesus (unrest), but leave the
unrest of the story to go on the rest of the story.
Be it known
there
is no law at all
in "the God of all grace". Be it
known that God did not send his Son until the fulness of the time (expiry date for
law) had come, and sent his Son with grace
and truth: grace for
salvation of
all and truth (about the law) for understanding
(enlightenment) of all.
Be it known God did not send
his Son to condemn
(law) the world (John 3:17), but that through him (through J-->C)
the might be saved (graced); Nor to destroy (law) any, but rather only
to
fulfill (with grace & truth) to the point you all (you and all the
KofG within you) are fully persuaded
"grace is
sufficient" (no law
req'd), and Spirit
persuaded (led) rather than Ghost driven. Harmless grace never
forces itself on anyone like harmful law does; So it's persuaded, not
forced, and via enough evidence
to make it fully
"evident" to you all: "that no man is
justified by
the law in the
sight of God": Galatians 3, and what's also noted in Hebrews 10
is sacrifice is by the law.
So we are plainly told that God will have mercy, and not sacrifice,
which is to allegory say God will have grace, and not law. For what the
allegoric script-u-are (of plural and contrary scriptures) saith is cast out the bondwoman and her son;
Which is to allegory say cast out the law and the result of law: sin
and death, even if it be another law of two laws, such
as love thy neighbor = the second. For we're told the second is like
the first when it comes to law law, and the first called law of sin has
a death sting. So also does the second have a sting. For Paul tried
"another law" in Romans 7, but law<--law brought him into
"captivity" to the law of sin, which made him do things he would not
do, and not do things he would do, hounding him with guilt till he felt
as "wretched" as those now suffering from PTSD. So another law is not
harmless, but as harmful as the first law.
His grace is not something to be legislated (lawed), but
rather to be
understood (learned). For if it were imposed by force upon penalty of
death it
would become LAWED-Grace (LORD-God), rather than Grace (God). So it is
written ("aforetime", and "for our learning": Romans 15:4, to "get
understanding": Proverbs 4:7) that adding law to "grace is sufficient"
makes
grace "no more grace", but rather some thing else, such as grace + law
= blessed + cursed = accursed. We could also say adding death to life
makes life no more life, but something else like life + death = a dead
end. We could also
say adding sacrifice to mercy makes God's mercy no more merciful. Hence
as James 3 concludes, such sweet + bitter: good + evil: grace + law:
bless + curse: live + die ought not be spoken nor given Amen if any do
mingle such contrary things like pure wisdom + devilish wisdom.
Be it
known Christ of Jesus --> Christ neither obeyed
nor disobeyed any law at all, but did
and said all by grace only (only grace allows all things; law limits to
not all). Be it known Jesus Christ did not accuse (law)
anyone, but rather revealed Mosaic law as being the "accuser of the
brethren".
Be it known Paul The Apostle clarifies.
He first clarifies the
twain (good-->better for them-->us), then even further
clarifies what's best (of good better best) for all (not some only) of
three things: good-->better (for some only)-->best (for all).
Perfection ("Grace with you all") is achieved by leaving the (good/better)
"principles" and going on unto perfection
(what's best, and for all).
Easter message Paul clarified: "that God
was in Christ reconciling the world unto
himself".
Be it known the work that God gave
Jesus --> Christ to do was finished
before the cross. Be it known the temple was cleansed before the
crucifixion. Be it known bread and wine were also substituted for lamb
and blood (sacrifice) at the last supper, which was not the passover
meal. Be it known the fig tree was cursed to the roots and the roots
withered before the triumphal entry into Jesusalem on Palm Sunday. Be
it known pure
religion didn't pay any ransom, but did pay a "visit" to
those "afflicted" with a bad case of grace + law = life + death = a
dead end. Be it known pure religion arrived "undefiled" and remained
"unspotted": James 1:27. Be it known God will have all men saved AND
all
men fully aware what they are saved from: law (sin and death).
Only law defines anything as sin, anyone as sinner. Only law
imputes
sin: Romans 4:15; 5:13. Only law was the strength of sin (the strong
man to first bind in order to spoil the house of sin) witch also had a
"sting" of death: 1Corinthians 15:56, and to all, even those who did
not sin: Romans 5:14. And to use law to impute sin made sinners all,
none righteous, no, not one (God is one). Hence the only wise God (of
foolish/wise Gods) did not impute sin, not even to them (Adam), the
(faulty) creation of created/made things; created imperfect and made
perfect after, in such a before/after shew purposed to shew the only
Potentate by shewing J-->C "in his (plural) times". But once that is
perceived of this/that, then the former part, the counter part of the
shew, should be discarded.
The
Easter message clarified even further: the shew was written aforetime
for our learning.
Since it is preposterous order to teach first and learn
after, both
sides (scriptures) of the shew
were written "aforetime" and "for our learning": Romans 15:4. Both are
played out for all to see that even God cannot be one by division,
and that God is one, one of us, with us, for us, hath given us the victory through Jesus --> Christ: the end of the law,
and hath not appointed us unto wrath (law worketh wrath: Romans 4:15),
and
the Lord is longsuffering unto us-ward (fwd of bwd/fwd
law/grace). Furthermore there's no "them" in "us-ward" at all (them
folk
"oppose themselves"); Which evidently meaneth
that God hath not appointed us (of them/us) unto law.
The
shew is purposed to reveal unto all there's no real safety in merciless
law.
The big WAVE of Katrina, Indonesia, and Japan was from LAW worketh wrath
(Romans 4;15) is simply 1Thessalonians 5:3 being revealed: when the
"Son of man" (arnion lamb) is "revealed" then it's destruction (not
salvation) intended for
"them all": Luke 17:27,29,30; Which is notably "also" followed by
1Thessalonians 5:9 for comparison of law vs grace ("also" merciful:
Luke 6:36) in the allegoric form of them vs us (Adam vs Christ: earthy
soulish Lord vs heavenly spiritual Lord); For "as in Adam (as in
"them":
Genesis 5:2) all die". So it is written: "if we thus judge one died for
all, then were all dead". Such (all dead: extinction) is what God will
not have, not then, not now, not ever. For such speaks of the
extinction of all, not of the (eternal) salvation of all.
The
Easter message clarified even futher: fence sitting time is over. It's
decision time!
Oxymoronic twain
doesn't sit well with either Son of man or Son of
God; Not with either law or grace. Law doesn't like
lukewarmness (halfheartedness) any more than
His Grace does. So the call from both law and from grace is
decide! Also get zealous about your choice, because the final exam shewdown
has already begun and oxymoronic indifference will not be tolerated,
especially by law.
Law will knock you off your Humpty Dumpty wall and stomp you into the
grave for lack of zeal. Grace will also shake you till what remaineth
cannot be shaken. Either way fence sitting time is over. For it's now
the "third day", time
to play the game of life or death for real, kinda like a hollowdeck
program with the safety switch turned off, when it's last state worse
for the majority.
The question of who
"us" is seems to be clarified as those who "live" by the prophet Hosea.
Yet well into the third day (light), we still find many getting duped
by
a liar saying: you're either with us, or against us; When the
script-u-are saith if God be with us, who can be against us. Only
law is "against" us: Colossians 2:14, therefore was nailed to the cross
as enmity, abolished once and for all. So saying "rule of law" is an
"us" thing is a flat out lie (law). Let God be true and every man a
liar. The third day (beyond 2,000) is
well under way, and things are getting interesting. We've now got 1Thessalonians 5:3
photographed: photos of the big WAVE from LAW. I'd recommend
to "them all" still saying Peace & Safety (Grace & Law), safety
in
Law, "rule of law" worldwide, look at the photos of the tsunami WAVE from LAW, courtesy of the
Knills family via CBC news. As we approach Easter 2011 we also have the
photos and videos of the Japan tsunami to see for ourselves there's no safety in law, "no
escape"
in 1Thess 5:3. And saying we're now safer, but not yet safe, as George
Bush junior did is the bwd safe<--safer (law<--law) of
Revelation 13 where the second beast of twain gives place and power to
the first beast of twain. Utter folly!
Clarity: wisdom from above (Grace
from God our Father) is
first pure, then peace-able
Looking at the only
wise instead of the other wise of two wisdoms, first pure wisdom from above (Grace unto you... from God our Father), there is an
escape for all (not for some, since "there is no respect of persons
with God"), and it's noted as being for us all of two alls: them all
and us all.
Paul talks of how (?) shall we escape in Hebrews 2, and it's not a fly
by night cloudy rapture theory of them vs them ("oppose themselves"); For the
division-all Son of man has a surprise ending for "them all" in Luke
17:27,29,30 (even the sheep of Mt 25) who look for such like to return; get sow
johnny law<--law
they
willingly compromise with law, not
knowing law also hates lukewarmness and eventually even turns on and
destroys the horse it rode in on (Revelation 6).
Clarity: great tribulation was not since
the beginning to this time, no, nor ever shall be
Rapture folk (who
also dwell on imputing sin for the hell of it and great tribulation
thereof) should be aware (by now) we all are
one had two ends to the last
millennium (not just the past millennium), of which Gutenberg was the
man of the millennium for inventing the printing press to publish the Bible. And the false end
of such twain (false/true ends) was called Y2K (which is to
allegorically say why two Gods and two ends). And such like (from such
turn away) had a countdown of 31/2 years (June 1996 - Dec 1999). So,
since it's now 2005 AD, well beyond a seven year tribulation beginning
1996, and having an (false) end in 1999, it seems PLAINLY evident all
rapture theory
folk (pre, mid, and post
tribbers) have all missed it, their rapture of some right, and also
their some left (behind). Selah Jerry
Jenkins and Tim LaHaye.
Clarity: "there is no respect of persons
with God", neither with law nor grace Gods
How silly, if "there
is no respect of persons with God", to even think of a rapture for some
only... to even think such if JC said he'd not accept 99/100, but only
100/100. For he said I have lost none of them that his God Father gave
him
(John 18:19) and notably before the cross in John 19. It simply goes
'against' the Holy Bible for such law law folk to have such childish theories as
rapture.
Nevertheless the "vanish" prophecy in Heb 8:13 and 1Cor 13:8 shall
occur as written. It's just a matter of time. Law, which is sow old
it's "ready to vanish", also "shall vanish". Yet not until such
beastial law
(which was, and is not, and yet is) is finally told to go jump in the (dead) sea by all. Mean-while, such
law<--law
will have a hayday of "fear hath torment" with them who put their trust
in either law of twain
in Rom 8:2.
For even the second and better of such laws is notably in "Christ Jesus", the
reverse of "Jesus Christ", and the grace and
truth of Jesus Christ is the only
foundation we should build on, but not add any law at all. For such
would be as adding death to life, making life + death = a dead end for
all. How (?) shall we
escape? Perhaps it is already written, and as the end (of law) to
endure unto:
The grace of our Lord Jesus
Christ with
you all. Amen.
|