Compromise? God Does Not Compromise! |
Grace does not compromise with lawGrace & Truth make law a dead testator!Contrary things cannot coexist in peace! Christ: is our peace who abolished the law. Grace vs Law are "contrary things" As "contrary" as Life -vs- Death Related GodShew.Org Web Pages: His Grace Unto You ... Not Law! Mercy Unto You ... Not Sacrifice! Peace Unto You ... Not Division! |
|
Grace unto you, and
(then) peace (is
able)
Looking at the law vs grace issue, we find law had an expiry
date, and was a schoolmaster to bring us to Christ: "the end of the
law". Mosaic law was also a schoolmaster which failed every student. In
Romans 9:31 we find all who tried to attain righteousness of the law
failed to attain it, as a mission impossible. For there is no
righteousness in such lefteousness when comparing the twain.from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ Compromise? God Does Not Compromise! Grace Does Not Compromise With Law. Contrary things cannot coexist in peace. Grace and Law make an oxy-MORON Rather when Grace & Truth came, law got abolished, blotted out, done away, taken away to establish grace. Mosaic law was the counter part in a two part shew about law vs grace, the imperfect part to be "done away" when the perfect part is come: 1Cor 13:10. Well, the perfect part is come long ago. Grace "came" by Jesus Christ: Jn 1:17, and Mosaic law is allegorically compared to His grace therein as lie vs truth. Only when the "fulness of the time" (expiry date for law) came did God send His Son: Gal 4:4. God did "not" send His Son to condemn (law: 2Cor 3) the world, but rather that through him (Jesus=>Christ) the world might be saved (from law): Jn 3:17; Rom 7:6; etc. Neither did the Son of God accuse anyone: Jn 5:45, for as he noted Mosaic law did this, being "accuser of the brethren". Such is the reason those under law at Mt Sinai "well said" accusation-all law should not be spoken to them again: Deut 5:25; Deut 18:16; Heb 12:19. Sadly, many Jews, Muslims, and Christians seem to ignore such truth, even today. The POINT made throughout Pauline epistles is that grace does not mix with nor compromise with law at all. They are contrary things which cannot coexist in peace. And since "he is our peace", who hath "abolished the law", it clearly denotes all law, everything written in stone and in ink (2Cor 3) is to be "done away" in order to have peace with God & Son. For peace with God is through Jesus => Christ: "the end of the law". Through J=>C law got abolished. When the end of part one of the shew came, then God sent His Son with grace and truth, to put an end, once and for all, to such law and lie of Moses. And when His grace came, there was no compromise whatsoever with law nor with those mixing law and grace (those who sat in Moses' seat). For such is an oxymoron with a bad ending, because if grace "is" and law "added", the only plausible mixture is grace(is) + law(added), which is also life + death, a dead end God will not have for himself or anyone else; not then, not now, not ever. As such, we find what God will not have is sacrifice, which is "of the law". When grace and truth came, then law got "abolished": Eph 2:15, to the POINT of "blotting out" all the ordinances against us: Col 2:14, to the POINT that every Mosaic law written in stone and in ink should be "done away": 2Cor 3, as the imperfect part is to be "done away" when the perfect part is come, just as childish things are to be "put away" whenever child=>man occurs: 1Cor 13. So there is no compromise whatsoever with law and lie when grace and truth come, truth out being on the rise lately, since it is now the prophetic third day. It is even to the POINT what is old, faulty, and "ready to vanish": Heb 8:13 "shall vanish": 1Cor 13:8. To the POINT there is no law at all mentioned at the end of the shew purposed to shew the only Potentate is His Grace; nor any mention of law at all in the conclusions of any Pauline epistles, including Hebrews and Revelation; and the reason being so that none perish thereby. Perhaps the reason our latter state seems to be looking worse rather than better is many, perhaps too many, have been compromising with law. Many have been saying law<=law things like Peace & Safety (Grace & Law), thinking there is safety in law (worketh wrath). A big WAVE from LAW worketh wrath revealed to the world there is no safety in such merciless law. Perhaps imposing 'rule of law' by pre-emptive war produces more sorrows. For peace is not the result of war, but rather the absence of war. Perhaps Jewish brethren forgot those under law at Sinai well said the law should not be spoken to them again (Deut 5:25; Deut 18:16; Heb 12:19), and that is why(?) the gospel of Christ: "the end of the law" is "to the Jew first" (Acts 13:46; Rom 1:16); Especially since law was only given to the Jews, never to Gentiles (Rom 2:14; 9:30-32). However since Gentiles feared the law, it became global, and Gentiles proselytized by Jews also require deliverance. Perhaps Muslim and Islamic brethren (peace be upon them all) forgot casting out Agar and her son was an allegory for casting out law (Agar = Sinai = law) and the result of the law: sin & death. Perhaps they also missed the biblical fact that God never requested and was never pleased with sacrifice (Ps 40:7; Hos 6:6) which is "of the law" (Heb 10). Hence their devotion to sacrifice is as marytr-dumb as any, all such sacrificial folk being ignorant of the biblical facts. Perhaps Christian brethren, both Roman Catholic and Protestant flavors of such impure religion, forgot even the better sort of two laws in Rom 8:2 is notably in "Christ Jesus", the reverse of "Jesus Christ" (the only foundation laid we should build anything on). And that a second beast gives place to a first beast in Revelation 13, which is as law<=law as Israel<=America is today, and it only makes the latter state "worse" (Mt 12:45; Mt 23:15; 2Pet 2:20-22): "more the child of hell" instead of what's exhorted: "be no more children". Same concept applies to servants; to whom the exhortation is "be no servant, but a son" (Gal 4:7); For children and servants both require being told what to Do-teronomy & Don't-eronomy till they stop being children and servants. Perhaps "we all are one" have all compromised with law in some fashion. Can it truly be said doctors and so many others working in the field of illness (biggest business on planet) really want wellness to prevail? Or can it be truly said undertakers deriving their livelihood from death really want life to prevail? What of those who make body bags; do they not rejoice at the coming of catastrophies and wars? What of the media who report on such; do they not rejoice at having a horror story? Can it be truly said millions of politicians, judges, prosecutors, lawyers, police, court workers, etc, all deriving their livelihood from law making and law enforcement, really want grace and truth to prevail? Or can it be truly said millions of ministers collecting a troll toll from flocks of unaware groupies really want awareness to prevail? Nobody is excluded from "we all are one", for "there is no respect of persons with God". If any do it, add law to "grace is sufficient", it's as if all did it, and until we all get it: understanding, it seems we're all grounded, many groundead. Indeed we all are one, brethren all; Yet the question remains which one of two alls: "them all" or "us all", or two one man scenarios in Romans 5, or two Adams? For two alls is one too many alls, twofold rather than onefold, simply a sides war and a blame game rather than unity of the Spirit as one God via the awareness game. If the Lord is longsuffering to "us-ward" so that none perish, it reasons them-ward is the reverse: all perish. For as it says, if one died for all, then were all dead; which is extinction, not salvation. So the quest-i-on is as Shakespeare said: to be "or" not to be, and as Ghandi said: the choice is non violence "or" non existence. Such speaks of grace "or" law since JC said God said: either make the tree good "or" evil (not both); For both is an oxymoronic paradox: grace + law = life + death = a dead end. Not to mention the end of OT law is fear (hath torment) of being 'smitten' by such a "curse". The Bible has no such dead end, because the end has no mention of law at all. Related Web Pages and
Articles:
Probating the will of God. What will God our Saviour have? Our only Goal is Get Understanding of Global Reconciliation The grace
of our Lord Jesus
Christ with you
all. Amen.
|