Two Revelations About
Revelation 2
|
Two Revelations about Revelation 2Apokalupsis: Two RevelationsSeven Spirits of Revelation revealed It's actually Two Revelations for Comparison: Apokalupsis Ioahnnou vs Apokalupsis Iesous Christos (Revelation of St John -vs- Revelation of Jesus Christ) A Shewdown of St John -vs- Jesus Christ: Law prophecies shall fail. Grace prevails. |
|
Revelations about
Revelation 2 contains these Revelations:
#1 #2
#3 #4 #5
Revelation about
Revelation 1: It's
the Final Exam of the Bible many deceived by many failRevelation about Revelation 2: It's the least read & understood book: massive ignorance Revelation about Revelation 3: title isn't Revelation, but The Revelation of St John The Divine Revelation about Revelation 4: It's Two Revelations: Revelation of John vs Revelation of JC Revelation about Revelation 5: One of two Revelations is God given: The Revelation of J C |
|
Revelation About Revelation
1
It's kinda like the Final Exam of the Bible, which many deceived by many have failed. Grace unto you, and
peace, from God
our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ
Before getting into discussion of
verses, or translations, or even the title of what's commonly called
Revelation, we need
to realize both acceptance and placement of it by Bible
translators is apt. It's aptly canonized
last of 66 books collectively known as the HOLY BIBLE
containing Old
& New Testaments.
As such, it not only concludes the Bible, but differently than Solomon's conclusion of the whole matter: Eccl 12. Translators not only agreed it qualified as a book of the New Testament sort, but canonized it last thereof as did councils before; Because it's like a final examination of what's already been shewn us (Eph 1:9), in allegorical fashion as a comparative teaching, written aforetime, as a "mystery" to be solved in time, "for our learning": Rom 15:4. Much like higher university courses require courses taken first as prerequisite, the 65 books prior to Revelation are all prerequisite; For therein is information required to solve the mystery, in time, which many deceived by many fail to do. All who wade into Revelation without embracing understanding, getting understanding of prerequisite things (Eg: Mt 15:10,11) to stand fast in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free (Gal 5:1), fail the exam; Not that is is impossible, just impossible with religious blinders on. Cleverly written! It's much like a hall of fame list of old (blind) faith heroes who "all died" and "received not the promise" in Heb 11: 13 & 29; Much like all Melchesedic type priests had a dead end in Heb 7:23; And much like all who tried failed to attain righteousness of law in Rom 9:31. The list and number of notable church leaders who've failed the 'open book' Exam is shocking. I studied many, for seven years, and found none of their theories computed. Even my own theories and timelines did not compute. I finally asked God, for "help" according to Hebrews 4:16, and for "wisdom" according to James 1. That God is
an
allness: all light and no darkness at all in 1Jn 1:5,
all love and no fear at all
in 1Jn 4, all grace and
no law at all in 1Pet 5:10,
all
mercy and no sacrifice at all in Mt 9:13
& Lk 6:36; Such needs
to be understood by all, for nothing less than all makes us one, whole.
So it's needful for all to get it: understanding, and understand God
hath no respect of persons, none! And that God took no pleasure in
offerings or sacrifices which are of the law, none! For the immutable
will of God is "I
will have mercy, and not sacrifice"...no sacrifice,
none! The same will, only said differently, is given in
2Pet 3:9: "The
Lord is not willing that any should perish (none!), but
that all should come to repentance". Why? Only all live, none perish,
is accounted
salvation. The other
wise, which isn't an
option but an as if,
is "as in Adam all die". Selah.
The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ
with
you all. Amen.
|
|
Revelation About Revelation 2
Revelation is the least read & least understood book of the Bible. Massive ignorance of Bible by scholars is oft as willing ignorance. Perhaps the purpose of Revelation is y(our) awareness, not blame. Grace unto you, and peace, from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ There's much interest in this
book of prophecy called Revelation and Apocalypse, nearly as
much interest as in another unsolved mystery: The Great
Pyramid, the seventh and only (still) standing
wonder of the "old" world. Both have many theories written
by many so called experts. Yet it seems a working knowledge of
either is
generally
beyond most people.
Sadly a working knowledge of Revelation is also beyond most ministers & Bible scholars, even the twenty five year veterans in Bible teaching on National TV. Eg: when asked a reasonable question about Revelation, Kenneth Copeland said: "I don't know anything about Revelation except that I get blessed by reading it". My thot on such would be if ya get blessed by reading about brethren suffering and dying, then you're $ick. Jack of the Impe family of JVI, who already celebrated fifty years of deceiving and fleecing many North American sheep in the name of God & Son, and by saying just what JC said such like would say in Lk 21:8, is simply fear mongering and peddling also: you must have this video, oh here is another one you must have, it's never ending. In my seven year study of Revelation prophecy (only 15 pages), I found nobody understood it; Those claiming to all disagreed, and no theories computed with the Scriptures, Gospels, and Epistles ... including mine. Perhaps our collective ignorance of Revelation is as great as the Humpty Dumpty sort, which also speaks of a "great fall"... kinda like a scrambled egg can't be unscrambled ... like the no escape sort of sudden destruction of 1Thess 5:3 for them who they say: "Peace & Safety" (Grace & Law), safety in law "worketh wrath"... Unless we all solve it and all escape destruction together. For there is no respect of persons with God, so the rapture of some only is not acceptable to God, who will have all saved and also all aware. Your ignorance is our ignorance, since (y(ou)r) is a compound word beginning with you, and we all are one. One what(?), besides brethren all, if the majority are ignorant to the point of mass ignorance, some even willingly ignorant; such that most people get tempted, deceived, duped, suckered, bewitched, etc. Perhaps the purpose of the revelation (uncovering) is awareness, not blame. Perhaps since your begins with you, you all begins with you, and the KofG is located within you, is why(?) JC said God said: get the beam out of your eye "first", in order for all to see the "greater" of great/greater "is here", "is come", and by such greater light rules the day, by that light of this/that lights, begin see-king. Thereby also help others, brethren all (Heb 2:11), to recover themselves ( 2Tim 2:26 ), in time ( Heb 4:16 ), lest all suffer and many perish due to mass ignorance. Eg: Titanic ... it went full steam ahead in a fog into an immovable object, due to a 'dead' line, and said unsinkable fellow ship sank instead of arriving safely at the proposed destination. All aboard thought ignorance was bliss. It was till disaster struck. All suffered, many perished. If you don't know anything about Revelation, if you can't pass the Final Exam, the Bible clarifies your ignorance is also our ignorance, also my ignorance, since all are as one collective whole and a little leaven leavens the whole lump. We've been in a global race since 1967, brethren all (Heb 2:11), all partakers of the "heavenly calling": Come, ye blessed; not depart, ye cursed; And come now, let us "reason" together, not quarrel). Why? Because quarelling is as strife, and James 3 says where strife, there confusion and every evil thing. Ignorance is not bliss. It's now AD, not BC nor any BC & AD mixture, since they are accounted opposite: <=BC/AD=>, so a mixture would be an oxymoron, and the mystery of God's will is already "made known" (Eph 1:9). So if any are still failing the Final Exam, then (you)r ignorance is indeed y(our) problem. We all sink or swim together, and I say all swim by doing my part, which also includes insisting you do your part, so we all get it: understanding. Many ass-u-me, thereby making an ass out of u and me; are often sow full of shit it's coming out the mouth, when such blessed + cursed coming out the same mouth ought not so to be. Rather the cursed part, the curse "of the law", the law, even better sort of Rom 8 law law, oughta be flushed (Jam 3).( Ph 3:8 ). If it's crap, flush it! Even the better law of Romans 8:2 law law is notably in "Christ Jesus", the reverse of "Jesus Christ"; Perhaps thereby it's also a faulty fault-finder childish blame game. Perhaps even better sacrifices are still martyr-dumb. Perhaps we should all be looking at what's best of three things: good better best, and best for all, not just better for some only. Perhaps we should all let go of the sides war, for even winners of such are losers of peace. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ
with you all. Amen.
|
|
Revelation
About Revelation 3
The title is not 'Revelation', but rather "The Revelation of St John The Divine", so: about Uncovering a Saint named John ... Divine?
Much like the first verse is actually the title in many
Psalms (Eg: Ps 64 title = To the chief Musician, A Psalm of David), and
such is often omitted in modern Bibles, the title and first verse of
what we commonly call 'Revelation' or 'The Apocalypse' is officially
"THE REVELATION of St. John The Divine"... which plainly suggests we
can expect THE UNCOVERING of a saint, named John, to know for certain
if he's divine, or not. For revelation, by defenition, means
uncovering, revealing, disclosure, discovery, etc; And such an
uncovering is also a Full Monty (nothing hidden that shall not be
revealed), not
just the back side of the presumed divine one some saw in the
old days, nor just the top layer of cover up removed from presumed
divine ones these last days. And as much as talk of such may offend
religious folk, raise their religious hackles, we're talking not only
butt naked, but frontal naked too, to see if a so-called divine,
sainted by popish Cephas, actually has what it takes to be "the"
divine, or perhaps he's just a eunuch in bed with the harem
of his lord. Or maybe he falls a little short of the all truth and
no lie at all if he says, of himself, that he's more beloved than
his fellow brethren, but only according to John, the only one of the
gospels having verily verily, which is kind of a dble take on such
in my opinion.
Worse confusion and misunderstanding comes when some modern KJV Bibles actually state the title as 'THE REVELATION of Jesus Christ', which the book also is (per Rev 1:1), but is so as the after part of a before and after shew , or the verse after the title; And also to denote The Uncovering of JC, and also a Full Monty for comparison since such is the God given revelation, uncovering, and as stated: "to shew" (by comparison) that he's got what it takes to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth; for God cannot lie and neither can His son: JC the same yesterday, to day, and for ever. Much confusion has resulted in not using the original title, which in the Greek text is Apokalypsis Ioannou, and simply means The Revelation of John, which means The Uncovering of John, which also means there's been a cover up which is now being uncovered to disclose, reveal, make aware something about John previously unknown; yet done in allegorical symbolism and as a satire about John, whom Paul names in one of his epistles as one of three top dogs who bewitched the churches of Galatia, the one he refers to as a thorn in his flesh sent to buffet him, and whom he calls a somewhat, I know not what, refering to his gospel as another gospel which is no gospel (not good news) at all, and to whoever brings such as accursed. So if you've thought, as many do, John to be a saint that's divine, dare to compare him with one who is: JC. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ
with you all. Amen.
|
|
Revelation
About Revelation 4
It's actually two Revelations (Two Uncoverings): Apokalupsis Ioahnnou -vs- Apokalupsis Iesous Christos The Revelation of St John -vs- The Revelation of Jesus Christ And it's a one winner take all shewdown Grace unto you, and peace, from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ A revelation of salvation (by
grace ) is best understood along with a revelation of
condemnation (by law
), a counterpart for comparison, to
know which is witch. By comparison we gain awareness and
understanding, thankfulness for grace, the glue of love holding all
together as one, brethren all with a hallowed name.
We've already established the title isn't Revelation nor The Revelation of Jesus Christ, but The Revelation of John (Apokalupsis Ioannou), which is The Uncovering of John. And the first verse also establishes a second revelation, uncovering: The Revelation (Uncovering) of Jesus Christ. So, obviously we have two Revelations or two uncoverings (for compare-i-son), not only to see which is witch, and who's got what it takes to be "the divine" one, but also as shewdown similar to the David -vs- Goliath confrontation of old, whereby both sides agreed prior to such it would be a winner take all shewdown of champions only. However in the David & Goliath scenario it wasn't a winner take all, for many fled when their giant dead, his head cut off with his own sword. So there was never really a winner take all in such a shewdown, nor is David ascended into the heavens (as clarified in Acts 2:34). Also clarified therein ( Acts 2: 35, 36 ) is that God "made" that same Jesus both Lord and Christ; perhaps the Lord: of all, and also perhaps the Christ: the end of the law. For "another Jesus" ( 2Cor 11:4 ) might also speak of "another gospel" which may also be "no gospel" (good news) at all (Gal). There is a winner take all, a "Lord of all", in a final shewdown of Johnny Law -vs- His Grace; Grace event-u-ally being the winner take all in any and every such shewdown, and because God declared it from the beginning, and because the will of God is immutable x 2, and because His grace is always "with you all" (against none at all, nor willing that any should perish, none at all depart, but rather that all should come, to repentance); Law being a "was, but is not" when the comparison is made, and thereby it's established which is witch of grace and law, and what law was . Yet, contrary to popular unbelief , JC neither obeyed nor disobeyed any law at all, nor gave law any place whatsoever in Mt 24:21, which also has a SAQ (#5) ; and we ought also to give "no place" to the devil as our Lord JC did, as a lead to follow. So law, witch was, but is not, and perhaps yet is, so perhaps the end is not yet if such yet is (and yet is only for the sake of a final shewdown, a final comparison, as the counter part, the imperfect part, to compare with the perfect part, which "is come" already, l-o-n-g ago; so then when the perfect is come, the imperfect should be "done away": 1Cor 13) ... so the law, everything written in stone and in ink (2Cor 3), got "abolished" (as "dung") for being the "enmity" (Eph 2), or "done away" for being a "ministration of condemnation" & "a ministration of death", or the "letter" witch "killeth" (2Cor 3), nailed & blotted out for being against us (Col 3). So in the end, of ends, there's but one revelation, of revelations: The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ
with you all. Amen.
|
|
Revelation
About Revelation 5
Only one of the Two Revelations is God given: The Revelation of Jesus Christ: to shew things
Of twain
revelations: (i) The Revelation of St John The Divine
(from title) (ii) The Revelation of Jesus Christ (from 1st
verse), only one seems to be clarified a given, or
of "God": "The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God
gave unto him ..."
(Rev 1:1a); And such a given also seems to have a purpose: "... God
gave unto him, to shew unto
his servants things; ..." (Rev 1:1b). So, we
have the uncovering of a saint named John (whose surname was "Mark":
Acts 12, as well as one of two sons of "thunder"), probably sainted by
popish Cephas (whom John called Father). And for comparison, and
probably since the title suggests John is not only divine, but "the
divine" one, God gave the uncovering of Jesus Christ, who is also God
sent, and probably as His version of what a divine one of twain oughta
be more like, or more like God than the
other one of twain being uncovered, perhaps even the "express image"
of God himself, as if God were a person (Heb
1:3) having "
the
same " character as JC, yesterday, to day, and
for ever (Heb 13:8); or as "the apostle" Paul suggests: "God in the
flesh", but also clarifies God is "excepted" (exempt, and perhaps
because God cannot lie) in such a mysterious shew about his will, but
the mystery is also "made known" unto us, and in time, lest all perish
if time expired and many of us were still so
ignorant we thought death a gain.
So, The Revelation (uncovering, disclosure) of Jesus Christ is a given, perhaps the only (God) given of twain revelations, and perhaps the other wise as James 3 said of such not from above, not pure (grace): "earthy, sensual, and devilish"; or perhaps the only one to be thrown out of a popularized twain such as baby and bath water. And the purpose mentioned, for uncovering Jesus Christ, is to "shew", or kinda like a comparative teaching method, and to shew "things" (plural), perhaps this and that, rather this or that since such things are contrary, as are two ways JC did shew in Mt 7: one leads to life, the other to destruction (the ruinous sort: the sort dinosaurs had: extinction). And perhaps, as Paul points out in Gal 4, such "things" are an allegory. And such things are for shew "unto his servants" (again plural), which will hopefully become significant to all readers as they begin to see the allegory of such things and how the mystery of his will is made known unto us by uncovering both John and Jesus Christ, comparing the two, perhaps see which is witch, and why one is perhaps better, or greater, or more like God is. For Revelations About Revelation # 6 - # 10 see Revelation About Revelations Page # 3 The grace of our Lord
Jesus Christ
with you all. Amen.
|