The Passion of The Christ Movie Review |
Passion of The Christ Movie ReviewStarring J C (James Caviezel)Biblically Inaccurate? Yes! An anti-Semitic movie? No! Beware the LEAVEN of Pharisees, and Mel Gibson Related GodShew.Org Web Pages Easter Easter Sermon Easter Projects: 1 2 3 Churchy Legalism: It's Spiritual Food Poison |
The Passion of the Christ Movie ReviewIt's Biblically Inaccurate! Especially when
starring JC
Starring JC: by whom came "grace and truth" (not law and lie) I finally saw Mel Gibson's movie starring JC (James Caviezel) who notably doesn't bare all. It's not the full monty promised in Luke 12:2. Rumor has it both Mel Gibson and James Caviezel received death threats for making an anti-Semitic movie. But it's not an anti-Semitic movie. Rather it's a Semitic movie focused on Jewish Law: Sacrifice(Slaughter) thereof to the point of a bloody mess followed by the dead end of both grace(life) and law(death) added; Witch is as "both good and evil" (saved + destroyed: Jude 5), since law is both good and evil. Hence in the news: all manner of evil(law) concupiscence among RCC priests via another law. John
1:17 (Notice
the 'comparative' teaching)
The law (and lie) "was" given by "Moses", But grace and truth came by Jesus Christ. (for comparison of law vs grace as if lie vs truth) The law "was, but is not": It got "abolished". "Ye are not under the law, but under grace". The movie is so biblically inaccurate, the marketing of it may be a grand hoax to help Godfather II (John-Paul II) revive $icily. For if it were "of God", it would be "freely given". Rather this movie costs victims a ransom to enter such l-o-n-g-suffering, another ransom for a popcorn and pop combo, the popcorn so double salted you'd better get the big drink deal(?). Movie Err-ology Applies; As does Massive Ignornance in NBC's Noah's Ark movie
(The Titanic movie less errant; But Titanic mentality only produces Bigger $candals) In two words: it's a 'bloody mess' that is 'biblically inaccurate'. I will not go into all the details about the movie err-ology many have already noted; The most notable being the arrest scene, where they did not all go backward and fall to the ground when Jesus said to them: "I am" (John 18:6). I will simply point out biblically inaccurate things many blame game players failed to notice about the movie the movie writer and producer also failed to notice or portray. An Anti-Semitic Movie? Not! Rather it's a
Semitc movie
Some say it's an anti-Semitic movie. I say it's the same "old" Horeb-bull which jewry peddles: a non stop mary go round of law, sin, and death followed by hell; Witch is mirroly the reverse of the true passion of the Christ: the end of the law (that Christ of that Jesus Christ which that God was in, reconciling the world, unto himself); Which speaks of grace->mercy->peace, by abolition of death<-sin<-law once and for all, by going through the cross to risen with Christ (not Jesus) instead of getting hung up on the cross, which is notably "cursed EVERY ONE that hangeth on a tree": Galatians 3. The operative word is "through": "through Jesus -> Christ": in one side ("Jesus": "made under the law": Gal 4:4) out the other side ("Christ": "the end of the law": Rom 10:4) of the allegoric "door", "way", to life: eternal life via risen and seated with "Christ" right of God in "heaven": "higher than the heavens" (not "standing" right of God on "high" in the "heavens"), as what is: right only and with "the God of all grace" (no law at all), leaving the enmity [law] nailed to the cross as what "was", and was notably "against us" to the point of extinction if law not abolished. For by the using of ordiances(laws) "all perish": Colossians 2:20-22. Friend: "I will never leave thee
nor forsake thee": Grace God ("higher")
Enmity: "I will forsake you", the city, your fathers:Law God (on "high") Christ is our "peace" who "abolished" the enmity(law): Ephesians 2 Peace with God, becoming alive unto God, victory over sin, and eternal life, are all notably through Jesus -> Christ, which ends with the Christ whose passion is: the end of the law, sacrifice thereof; And the Christ of J->C is the end of the law, as if taking a grace walk: a walk from Mt Sinai to Mt Sion through the valley of the "shadow" (law: Heb 10:1) of death: Ps 23. For there is no "shadow" of turning with God, no variableness with God (Jam 1:17), nor any such like with the Son of God either, "Jesus Christ: the same yesterday, to day, and for ever" (Heb 13:8). And for them who think other wise, the devilish wise of James 3:15, well, they may all bend over and double law law kiss their divided ass bye bye for playing the blame game which evidently ends in the hall of shame (Heb 11: 13, 39), not fame. For what's evident from the evidence thereof is "these all died" and "received not the promise". No amount of lying, crying, and dying has ever, nor will ever, move God to change His will which is immutable x 2, two immutable things: God cannot lie(law) nor die(law). No, not even 6 Billion lying crying dying people who are all grounded till they all get it: understanding, which is "grace glory" (Proverbs 4). And for the record, I'm not anti-Semitic nor anti-American, but anti-ignorance, be it Jewish, Muslim, Christian (Roman Cathoholic or Protestant) ignorance; including my own ignorance. It's you 1st when it comes to get the beam out. I don't want to be right to make any wrong, nor leave any behind; Rather right to make all right and none left (behind) at all. So, let's get that right out in the open, up front, in your face to legalists who get so easily off ended, and thereby easily beset. Truly Grace us folk never get off ended, nor easily beset by another law. I speak of "the Christ", Christ of "Jesus>Christ": the only foundation ever laid; Not of the Christ of "Christ->Jesus", is mirrorly the reverse and ends with "Jesus" (not the Christ), witch is kinda like "go" <-bwd to them-ward (unrepentant BC), converted Paul called a "draw back" to "perdition" (Hebrews 10:39): the "all perish" of Colossians 2:20-22, which converted Peter also describes as all perished by being willingly ignorant (2Peter 3:5,6): darkness; Instead of "come" (now let us reason) fwd-> to us-ward (repentant AD) to "none perish" via "with all thy getting, get understanding": "grace glory" (Proverbs 4), which is what the Lord (is now "that Spirit" of this/that Spirits: 2Corinthians 3:17; the Spirit of Grace, Truth thereof) is l-o-n-g-suffering unto. Allegory:
The "Christ", of "through Jesus -> Christ"
"Jesus": "made under the law": Gal 4:4 ... them-ward "Christ": "the end of the law": Rom 10:4 ... us-ward Ye are not under law(Jesus), but under grace(Christ) For Christ's sake people, it's now AD-> (not <-BC), and the Lord is long-suffering to "us-ward" (not them-ward). It's even beyond 2,000 AD, now the prophetic "third day" is also the seventh day wherein he will raise us (not them) up: Hosea 6:2. The "third day" is also the seventh day, if counting the days in John 1 and 2:1 ("let him that hath understanding count": Revelation 13; So I guess understanding counts). To hear of Billy goat Graham, Evangelastic Evangelicals, Roman Catholics, and many others "such like" giving praise to this movie, bloody sacrifice(slaughter) thereof, only reveals more evidence "their" gospel (sorrows) is "another gospel", spawned by adherance to "another law", making it the blessed(graced) + cursed(lawed) = "accursed" sort of gospel (Galatians 1:9). No matter, the shewdown is already written. So is the end of it (Revelation 22:21). It's just a matter of time, till we all get it: understanding, for it's not optional nor biblical to have any darkness (law) at all in heaven (graceland), holy place of "that God": light void of darkness, which is allegorically understanding void of ignorance, and grace void of law, love void of fear, joy void of sorrow, blessing void of curse, life void of death, etc. Mel Gibson's The Passion of The Christ movie is as biblically inaccurate as NBC Noah's Ark television movie was, not only having miss quotes, but artistic license to lie; Missing the spiritual moral of such biblical allegory by a broad country (usa) mile. Does it really matter? Yah! It's a matter of life or death: to all, not some only. For "there is no respect of persons with God": whatever applies to anyone applies to all, kinda like in the schools on Valentines Day it's now: if anybody gets a valentine everybody gets one. Sadly the schools haven't heard or adhered to the fact Valentines Day got canceled (abolished) in 1969, and so did the law before the cross. So this faulty law law is getting pretty "old", to the point of being "ready to vanish": Hebrews 8. The Passion of the Christ movie, about the last 12 hrs of Jesus (not Christ, who's one with God eternal, and who paid a visit, not a ransom), starts out with a quote from Isaiah to set a Jewish-american (Childofhell-morethechildofhell) sacrifice-all theme of atonement, for transgression (where no law, there no transgression: Rom 4:15); $uch at-one-ment being with Jesus: King of the Jews (law). Ug! I say Ug, for it's accounted if one died for all, then were "all dead", the extinction sort of dead end: what that God will not have, not then, not now, not ever. Rather that God will have mercy, and not sacrifice; so none perish, rather than all perish by law, witch imputes sin (when no law, sin is not imputed: Rom 5:13), and when sin is finished it brings death upon all (Jam 1). For Christ's sake "we are delivered from the law" (Rom 7:6), the schoolmaster (Gal 3) witch failed every student (Rom 9:31; Heb 7:23; Heb 11:13,39; and Jude 5): these "all died" and "received not the promise"... a big OOPS. The movie gets into the brutality of law worketh wrath and ye do err (not knowing the scriptures nor the power [gospel: Rom 1:16] of God) rather quickly. Viewers suffer through 70 lashes (stripes), when biblical and historical standard is 39 (40 would kill a man, which was even against the Jews religion). Paul: "Of the Jews five times received I forty [stripes] save one". It is by the (39) stripes of Christ (who did no sin) ye were "healed" (not killed); For "ye" (strangers scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia) "were" (past tense) as sheep "going" (opposite of coming) "astray"... such like Philistines who'd promised they'd join the winner take all, then fled. Going beyond Braveheart Gorey, into the realm of Bush league Gruesome, they turn Caviezel over and do a frontal flogging... not biblical! It's behind (get thee behind me Satan), the backside (where Moses led the flock of his father "in law": Ex 3:1), not up front. Doublemindead "Moses Moses" (Ex 3:4) led such on to what was Horeb-bull, and so terrible was the sight even terror-ist Moses (Dt 34:12) said: "I exceedingly fear and quake" (Heb 12:21). Then viewers are fed the wrong order of seven last utterances, not to mention a "more subtle" miss quote of twain Gods in the midst of such Menorah seven: "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me", which takes place about the 9th hr (3pm), the "hour of prayer" (Acts 3:1) and "vision" (Acts 10:3), also the appointed time for slaying the passover lamb, vision-able from Calvary on such a "preparation" day (day before the annual sabbath, not weekly sabbath; which on this particular occasion was like a dual sabbath: passover sabbath first on 14th of Abib [Thursday], then a the weekly sabbath which begins at sundown Friday), a day which had a solar eclipse (darkness over the earth) from the 6th to 9th hr (not some cloudy localized sons of thunder storm). The question ("shalt thou"?) to the thief on the left was an err (movie dub said "thou shalt"), as was the biblical fact both thieves first mocked him (Mt 27:44; Mk 15:32), then one (on the right: his left) continued to rail, whereas the other (on the left: his right) rebuked the one on the right, reminding him he was in the same condemnation (law being a "ministration of condemnation": 2Cor 3). It's an allegory (Gal 4), with a moral, not an oxyMORON with a BAD ending! Hellno's review of the Passion movie seems to have ample evidence it's an allegory, but doesn't yet seem aware it is an allegory, nor that all scripture (singular) is inspired of God, not all scriptures (plural), which are indeed contradictory (scripture vs scripture) and far fetched if taken literal... the point of the shew being to know what script u are of twain and opposing Gods. Paul allegorically asks and answers what saith the script u are? Answer: cast out the woman and her son. Allegory: the woman, this Agar, is Mt Sinai = the law. So the script u are saith cast out the law and result of the law: sin and death. The mirror aspect of both Grace and Law being on the cross in one person should have been noted by the fact when "he saith" Woman, behold thy son!, it is "saith he" (the reverse of "he saith") which then says Behold they mother! But it was overlooked, as was the biblical note three Marys stood by the cross (also an allegory) and two Marys looked on afar off. The movie is so Popishly focused on one Mary, and errantly sow, that it nearly isn't biblical at all. Judas Iscariot, which "also" betrayed him (as if he were the only one... not!) was "of the number" of the twelve (I wonder what number such might be... perhaps one, if "a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump"; but one what?)... this Judas (of two such named apostles) whom Satan [law] entered is tormented by devilish children in the movie. While such isn't biblical, I could go with it does allegorically reveal many little [law] children are hypocritical foolish mean mouthed vipers who sit in Moses' seat: law, collectively the "child of hell" (Mt 23), and their Mosaic accusations (Jn 5:45) are tormenting; which would also make Jewdized-americans "more the child of hell". As for the dead donkey scene, Judas unhooking the bridle rope and hanging himself with it high up on a dead tree not found anywhere near Jerusalem, I'd say it's quite a stretch from information contained in one verse in Acts of the Apostles 1:18 "Now this man purchased a field [the field is the world] with the reward of iniquity [the wages of sin]; and falling (not hanging) headlong, he burst asunder in the midst, and all his bowels gushed out". I might rather perceive a suicidal head first leap of blind faith off some high cliff onto some sharp stones [laws] if I were the movie writer or the movie director. For those who say he shouldn't have said "it is accomplished", they obviously haven't read the Bible exhortation to "take heed", nor Strong's concordance; teleo (finished) does also mean "were", "accomplished", "fulfilled", and "done" in John 19 (not to mention "finished", "fulfilled", and "expired" in Revelation 20):
It is accounted if one died for all, then were all(?) dead: "as in" Adam all die. It's an allegory! ...wherein first Adam is the LORD (Gen 4:1) who produces twain (sons): grace + law, witch fear is of, and is only the beginning (not end) of wisdom; But last Adam (grace) is the Lord from heaven (above), which perfect (merciful) love is of, and such is the end (not beginning) of wisdom. So the end is written as "The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ with you all. Amen". The grave clothing in the movie was not at all biblically accurate, for when a 100 pound "mixture" of myrrh + aloes is applied to any body wrapped in linen, it forms a mummy like cast, which might imprison someone not really dead, as is "the manner of the Jews burial". And so as to be sure Christ is risen, and the body simply not stolen, those who looked into the tomb saw the hollow mummy cast still intact, whereas the linen face cloth was elsewhere. It's all very allegoric, requires much "take heed" to detail, every word carefully chosen by writers like Paul: a "faithful steward of the mysteries" (a revealing revelator yes, but allegorically only to those who seek according to the clues given for see-king, and thereby find grace, to help, in time). So also learned translators of the Bible give more earnest heed to every word, and also make three wishes, notably "through" JESUS CHRIST prior to translating (perhaps to) "In the beginning God [Elohyim: plural]" ...as if an eternal God is plural ...not! or has either beginning [of days] or end [of life]... not! ... so it's a shew. Not to
mention eternal God is "excepted"(exempt) from such law law.
It's notably not all scriptures(plural), but rather all "scripture"(singular) that's given by inspiration of God: 2Timothy 3:16. And the singular God inspired script-u-are saith: "cast out the bondwoman and her son", "which things are an allegory" (Galatians 4) meaning cast out the law and result of law: sin & death. That(of all this/that), dear viewers dedicated to "watch"-ing the shew as exhorted to in Mark 13:37; That is life for you, the "eternal" sort rather than this: temporall life + death = dead end = grace + law: ministration of death. I could go on, since The Passion of the Christ movie is sow errant (2Pet 2:22), but I'm well over 30K, so I won't. Beware the LEAVEN of Pharisees, scribes, lawyers, and Mel Gibson. A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump; so a little leaven leaveneth the whole movie. Over 800 web pages commenting on The Passion of the Christ movie were found on a google seach as of May 2004. Below is one by some priest who thinks death brings life; And it does iff it's die to the law (not by the law). For dying to law, making it dead testator, is as becoming alive unto God(Grace). So obviously this priest hasn't heard that the love(God) of Christ(the end of the law) constraineth us to judge something in 2Cor 5:14. We thus judge if one died for all, then were all dead. All dead is extinction, not salvation. Hello! Another Movie Review A
Canadian Catholic priest, Gérald Caron, writes, “[T]o
make such a spectacle of Jesus’ passion and death totally disconnected
from his message and life mission is theologically flawed. It is not
the quantity of blood and suffering that has redeemed us, but Jesus’
death—crowning a life of ‘service’ as Mark says in 10:45. It was the
price He had to pay, not to God, but to remain faithful to the call and
mission of His life. It was His vision of God’s reign that led Him to
the cross—not the other way round.” In
closing (with grace) I'll
clarify further "Jesus of Nazareth: King of the Jews" is allegory
for the law; And "Christ: the end of the law" an allegory for grace.
So Jesus (of Jesus christ), after reconcling all unto himself under
law: made all sinners thereby, since law imputes sin to all (not some
only),
and took such law vs grace to the cross. But only Christ (of Jesus
Christ), His grace, is thereafter risen, revived, and "seated at the
right
hand of God" as what's right with God. The LORD said to my Lord: sit
(not stand). It's all
"allegory", and "mystery"(noted over 20 times), so allegoric
mystery to solve in time (since there's no mystery nor time in
eternity), allegoric mystery written "aforetime"
for our "learning": Romans
15:4; Perhaps to "go ye and learn
what meaneth: I will
have mercy, and not sacrifice"... meaneth I
will have grace, and not law. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ with you all. Amen. |