When asking so-called Christ-ians what the difference is between Jesus and Christ, many will say there's no difference except Jesus is his name and Christ his title. But in the Holy Bible (7th Bible) commonly called KJV there's many notable differences between Jesus and Christ to be aware of. Such differences are more noticeable in the epistles of Paul The Apostle, whose gospel is notably not the gospel of Jesus, which Jesus himself clarified is division and not peace: Luke 12:51, but is:

                                                The Gospel of Paul is:
                                                - the gospel of God: Grace, and
                                                - the gospel of Christ: Peace.

So we find Paul The Apostle opening his epistles with an holy kiss: "Grace unto you, and peace, from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ", as if to say Grace and Peace from God and Son; And in the same manner as the New Testament opens in Matthew 1:1 with "the generation ('genesis') of Jesus Christ", in contrast to the generations ('genealogies') of Adam in Genesis 5. Paul notes in 1Corinthians 3:10,11 that the only "foundation" laid to build the house of God upon is "Jesus Christ", is not Christ Jesus, which is mirrorly the reverse of Jesus Christ. Paul does use both Jesus Christ and Christ Jesus, but always clarifies he is an apostle of Jesus Christ writing into Christ Jesus people. Paul also notes, several times, that peace with God and eternal salvation is "through Jesus-->Christ", only in Christ, and only in the Christ of ascending Jesus-->Christ which end focuses on Christ, not the Christ of descending Christ-->Jesus which end focuses on Jesus. For the notable difference is the difference between peace, not divided -vs- division, not peace.


So the foundation laid is Jesus Christ, but the objective is to grow unto the fulness of Christ, by going through Jesus-->Christ, as if through swordy division-->peace. For "God is not the author of confusion, but of peace"; And peace with God is "through Jesus-->Christ", only in that Christ, in the same manner as going through plural God to God is one to have the oneness of that God. For "To wit, that God was in Christ reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them": 2Corinthians 5:19, as if to say not in Jesus who did law impute their trespasses to them. For Hebrews 4:8 notes Jesus did not give them rest (peace); And when we look at the phrase "because of him": John 7:43 notes there was division (unrest) among the people because of him, and Revelation 1:7 notes there shall be world-wide wailing because of him. So perhaps we should all notice the word "through" in John 3:17 says "God did not send his Son to condemn (law) the world (no, not this), but that: the world through him might be saved (graced)". Through him later speaks of being "through his name": Jesus-->Christ; And through speaks of in one side and out the other, as if going through a door, way. So we find JC saying I am the door, way, to truth and life.

                                        Through Jesus-->Christ is as if
                                        through Division-->Peace is as
                                        if through Unrest-->Rest is as
                                        if through Law-->Grace is as
                                        if through Death-->Life, and by
                                        die to the Law, instead of by the Law


What many don't realize is things about Jesus are cloudy instead of sunny with Christ; Which is to say Holy Ghost instead of Holy Spirit; Which is to say Law driven instead of Grace led, the difference being "walk before me" when Law driven and "follow me" when Grace led. Law may also begin leading unto life, but then goes behind as it did in Exodus 14:19. But with Grace the only thing behind you is Law, and it usually calls loudly to get you to turn, as John turned in Revelation to what was calling from behind him. Only a dog turns again to his vomit, as a washed sow turns to her mire, as a fool returns to his folly: law. So let's notice things about Jesus are cloudy. Cloudy witnesses who came out of the cloud at his transfiguration spoke of his decease, and those who entered the cloud were sore afraid and confused. Clouds allegorically represent confusion. God is not the author of confusion, but of peace; And peace with God is through Jesus-->Christ, only in that Christ thereof, who ascended higher and sitteth above the clouds where it is always sunny. But in the clouds and beneath the clouds it is not always sunny. Clouds also cast a shadow (darkness) on earth; And there is no shadow of turning in God is light void of darkness. Hebrews 10:1 notes law is the "shadow" (dark version) of things to come, not the very (true) things to come.



On the topic of forgiveness there's some notable contrasting differences between Jesus and Christ. In what's commonly called the Lord's Prayer, which is notably how John the Basptist taught his disciples to pray, we find a snare: forgive us as we forgive: Matthew 6:12. Furthermore in the PS to the Lord's Prayer it clarifies if you don't forgive men their trespasses then neither will the God Father of Jesus forgive you your trespasses: Matthew 6:15. Example: Matthew 18:23-35. But in Ephesians 4:32 we find God hath forgiven you for Christ's sake, and in Romans 5:8 it was while you were yet an unforgiving sinner. Such begs the question of how did God do that, if law not only imputes sin, but unpardonable sin? The only plausible answer is God hath forgiven you for Christ's sake by the abolition of law. For when we look at how Jesus and his God Father forgives, we find a servant is forgiven + unforgiven + tormented in Matthew 18:23-35 concludes his God Father will do likewise to those who don't forgive others. Yet how can we forgive all men all trespasses if not all trespasses are forgiveable by inexcusable law? Jesus noted blasphemy the Ghost (Law) hath never forgiveness, neither in this world nor the to come. So, the only plausible way to have forgiveness void of unforgiveness + torment is by abolition of law, all law written in stone and ink. Such is only plausible in Christ is the end of the law, our peace who abolished the law (enmity), and notably "the law of commandments", which is Genesis 2:17 of Genesis 2:16 + 17 addead. So all other law was added, and because of the transgression occured because of it: Galatians 3:19. So by abolishing one lousy tree law, Christ effectively abolished all law written in stone and in ink. Thereby God hath forgiven you for Christ's sake (not Jesus' sake), because where no law, there no transgession to even be in: Romans 4:15. Where no evil (law) is thought there's nothing to forgive. But where there's envying and strife, there's confusion and every evil (law) work: James 3:16.


What many don't realize is that a lot of things in the Bible are mirrorly reversed, kinda like the dark-end image in the mirror is the reverse of the likeness making it. Both may look the same, but when likeness raises a right hand the image raises a left hand. This mirror war is endless until the likeness does this: "from such turn away" and let's the mirror image vanish. For Christ Jesus is mirrorly the reverse of Jesus Christ, as am I is mirrorly the reverse of I am, and life eternal is mirrorly the reverse of eternal life. For concerning let us make man, the two options given to contrast (not mingle) are: (i) in our image vs (ii) after our likeness: Genesis 1:26. So it's like a before vs after shew, both being played out prior to deciding which is witch, flushing one as dung. For only the image can be created and destroyed, but the likeness of God cannot lie nor die. So let's notice the difference between things like life eternal is not eternal life; and lay hold on eternal life. For life eternal can be endless life + death + life + death, due to having two resurrections, both from the grave, and the latter being resurrection of damnation, which continues damning everyone to death, requiring a resurrection of life from the grave. God's Grace isn't a grave subject, and Christ's eternal life isn't life after death, but life void of death via grace void of law which is also mercy void of sacrifice, which is peace void of confusion. For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace; And peace with God is through Jesus-->Christ, only in that Christ is the end of law. For in Jesus of through Christ-->Jesus there is endless life + death, followed by resurrection of both grace and law via resurrection of life (grace) and resurrection of damnation (law). So Hebrews 6:1 tells us to leave resurrection of the dead in order to go on unto perfection has no dead to resurrect. Perfect God is not the God of the dead, but the God of the living: Matthew 22:32; Mark 12:27; Luke 20:38. Such is to say not law, but grace, in Christ is the end of the law, since law was the ministration of death. Such is like leaving imperfect Jesus to go on unto perfect Christ: perfect man, whose end (not begin) is peace. Hence Jesus (not peace) is not the perfect prototype, but Christ is.


Jesus said he did not come to bring peace, but a sword: Matthew 10:34, and not peace, but division: Luke 12:51; And the division he brought was left/right: Matthew 25:31-33 instead of under/above: Genesis 1:6-8. The problem with such is even when right of left/right things on high, which can be law of law/law or grace of law/grace, it's still double minded, highminded, and still division, not peace, and still part-iality, not perfect-ion. So it's as if wrongly dividing the waters (words). In contrast Christ rightly divides under/above like God did in Genesis 1:6-8, and ends up seated above instead of being right to make others wrong on high, which is a blame game ends in a hall of shame. The difference is also the difference between two swords, law being a sharp twoedged sword which bites and smites, and grace being a sharper sword of the Spirit which upbraideth not. We learn in Ephesians 6: 17 that the sword of the Spirit is the word of God, and in Hebrews 4:12 the word of God is sharper than any twoedged sword, and in James 1:5 that God upbraideth not: neither bites nor smites like a sharp twoedged sword does in Revelation. The sword of the Spirit brings peace (rest), but a sharp twoedged sword which executes vengeance and punishment doesn't bring peace. Such is to say there is neither peace nor safety in law worketh wrath multiplies sorrows, but both peace and safety in grace worketh mercy multiplies peace world-wide. Jesus spoke of sorrows while sat down in a grave yard (mount of olives), but Christ is our peace who abolished the law. So Jesus (law) is the beginning of sorrows, and Christ (grace) is the end of sorrows.


What's not so easily seen is the two different Lambs and the two different sorts of blessed in Psalms 32:1,2 (Romans 4:7,8). The first sort of blessed is a childish cover up that gets uncovered later by Luke 12:2. The second sort of blessed is the blessedness of man: Blessed the man to whom the Lord will not impute sin. Jesus can be both sorts of Lamb: amnos Lamb first: John 1:36, arnion Lamb after: Revelation. But Christ is only amnos Lamb; And thereby we are better blessed, instead of both blessed and cursed = accursed. So Galatians 1:8,9 tells us if any man or angel brings another gospel, such as another law, then let him (not you) be accursed by it. For it's cursed every one that hangeth on a tree. So what Jesus did by getting hung up on a tree was cursed every one: Galatians 3:13. But Christ would not receive the mingled drink: Matthew 27:34; Mark 15:23; Which is to say Christ would not receive grace + law, which is like blessed + cursed = accursed. With Jesus as "a greater is here", a greater prophet than Jonah and a greater king than Solomon, it can also be "greater damnation": Matthew 23. But with Christ it's reconciliation to the greatest of three things never fails, which is reconciliation to that God is light and in him there is no darkness at all.


When studying six mentions of "mediator" we learn mediator is Jesus of descending Christ-->Jesus; And a mediator is not of one (God), but between God and men. Jesus may be the mediator of a better covenant that speaks better things, such as love your enemies is better than love thy neighbor and hate thine enemy. But in Christ of ascending Jesus-->Christ there are no enemies to even love, only friends. So let us be reconciled unto God in Christ of Jesus-->Christ, instead of being mediated vengeful and punishing law law in Jesus of Christ-->Jesus. For Jesus is the mediator in Sion, and there is stumblingstone laid in Sion to stumble on and fall from grace to law again, another law being like another snare of the devil to set at liberty from, again; Kinda like this scenario in Jeremiah 34:11 servant... set free... servant again. In Christ there are no servants, because servants know not what their schoolmaster: law doeth; But friends know: John 15:15. In Jesus a servant gets forgiven + unforgiven + tormented: Matthew 18:23-35; And if we do not forgive all men all trespasses, then his God Father will do likewise to us. But Christ's God Father hath forgiven you: Ephesians 4:32, while yet a sinner: Romans 5:8, and notably for Christ's sake. Such begs the question of how did God do that, if inexcusable law not only imputes sin, but unpardonable sin. The only plausible way is abolition of law, all law written in stone and ink; Because when studied out, inexcusable law hath never forgiveness, but rather forgiven + unforgiven + tormented. So if forgiven by law, know it's a cover up blessed: Romans 4:7 that also gets uncovered in Luke 12:2. It will bite and smite you later on, if unaware forgiveness by law is actually a mission impossible.


Another difference is Jesus is called the Saviour of Israel (of Jacob/Israel): Acts 5:31; Acts 13:23; But Christ is called the Saviour of the world: John 4:42; 1John 4:14. The interesting thing about Jesus being the Saviour of Israel (of Jacob/Israel) is that Israel is allegorically referred to as the fig tree, and when Jesus found no fruit on a fig tree he cursed it, even though it wasn't the time yet for figs (fruit). Thereafter the fig tree withered: Matthew 21:20-21; Mark 11:11-21. It made me ponder what Jesus, as Lord also of the Sabbath, might do to sheep of goats/sheep if they didn't bear fruit; Not to mention favoring sheeple is as having partiality, and there is no partiality with God. So it reasons why Christ (not Jesus) is called the Saviour of the world.

Such brings me to the topic of Jesus being made under the law, and of woman (being deceived, was in the transgression), noted in Galatians 4 where it also notes God did not send his Son until the fulness of time for law had ended, and sent him to redeem those that were under the law; Which is to say law had an expiration date, and it was now time for grace in such a law/grace shew. Luke 16:16 also brings this to light by saying "the law and the prophets were until John (the Bapatist), but since that time the kingdom of God (grace and truth) is preached, and every man (of child/man) presseth into it". So the change from law to grace, is as from lie to truth, and as from servants (prophets) to friends k-now, and as from child to man. John 15:15 concurs about the change being from k-now not servants (prophets) to friends k-now. 1Corinthians 13:10,11 concurs with Luke 16:16's change being from child to man, and as if change from part-iality to perfect-ion. Luke 13:32 also notes Jesus was not (yet) perfected while casting out devils and doing cures; As there's no devils to cast out nor ills to cure when perfection (grace) replaces partiality (law). So then the change from Jesus to Christ is as from imperfect (law) child to perfect (grace) man; For the law cannot ever anyone perfect: Hebrews 10:1, and Psalms 37:37 clarifies this about the perfect man: "the end (not begin) of that man (Jesus-->Christ) is peace (rest). So Christ is the perfect prototype.

Jesus sat down in a grave yard (mount of olives) to give an olivet discourse having the beginning of sorrows (laws) and two possible ends: the end (suntelia) of the world: destruction or the end (telios) to endure unto: salvation. Christ sitteth higher, where there is no destruction, only salvation; Which is to say no law, only grace, because grace is not a grave subject like law law was. When standing right with Jesus there is still under-taker jeopardy every hour, and when sat down with Jesus there are still enemies to be made a footstool. But when seated with Christ above there's neither under-taker jeopardy nor enemies when all friends know that God is merciful: harmless, but plural God on high was neither merciful nor harmless. For all who died under Moses' law notably died without mercy: Hebrews 10:28. The only law given by Moses (John 1:17) was Genesis 2:17, for all other law (10 in stone, 613 in ink) was added because of it: Galatians 3:19. So Christ abolished the law of commandments; Which is to say Christ abolished Genesis 2:17 of Genesis 2:16 -vs- 2:17. By abolishing one lousy tree law, surely die lie thereof, Christ effectively abolished all law written in stone and in ink. For where no law, there no transgression to even be in: Romans 4:15. All other law was added because of transgression, occured due to Genesis 2:17 being added to Genesis 2:16; Which is to say law being added to grace, death being added to life, notably by Moses. So it's no wonder God called him "Moses, Moses" at the burning bush, to denote he was double minded.