Holy Kiss Greeting: Grace
unto you, and peace,
from God our Father and the
Lord Jesus
Christ.
Which is Witch Comparison: CJ vs JC?
What
Foundation is laid: this (Law) or that (Grace) ?
Law saw good + evil or Grace saw good-->very good?
Law saw life + death or Grace saw life-->eternal life?
Which do you prefer: Mediation or Reconciliation?
Which do you prefer: grace + law or grace + truth?
"Christ
Jesus" or
"Jesus
Christ"
( Part: Acts
19 - 1Peter 5 ) or ( All: Matthew
1 - Revelation 22 )
"yea, and all who will live godly
in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution": 1Tim 3:12
"other foundation can no man lay than that
is laid, which is Jesus Christ": 1Cor
3:11
"being justified by faith, we have peace
with God through our Lord Jesus
Christ": Rom 5:1
reckon ye also yourselves to be... alive
unto God through Jesus Christ
our Lord: Rom 6:11
wages of sin death, but the gift of God eternal
life through Jesus Christ
our Lord: Rom 6:23
"Peace" with God is through Jesus --> Christ.
Reverse: Christ --> Jesus,
is not peace, but rather division.
Grace(not law) unto you, and peace(not division),
from God our Father and the
Lord Jesus Christ
Biblical Comparison: Compare-i-son of
Christ Jesus and Jesus Christ:
"Christ Jesus" (mirrorly the reverse
of "Jesus Christ") does not
occur in any of the four gospel accounts,
nor
in Revelation, nor in any of the conclusions
of any Pauline
Epistles.
"Christ Jesus" occurs
57 times from Acts 19 to 1Peter 5 compared to "Jesus Christ"
occurs
196 times from Matthew 1 to Revelation 22 in the New Testament. Clearly
the majority goes to "Jesus Christ" as the only foundation laid in
Matthew 1:1, which is clarified as the manly
thing to do in 1Corinthians 3:11; For the childish thing to do is be
divisional in Christ Jesus. In the end already written it's not the law
of CJ, but the grace of JC that is with you all, which notably begins
with you. So get it right, of CJ vs JC; lest you suffer persecution and
mediation, or worse: be not suffered to continue, by "no effect" and
"not escape" clauses of Galatians 5:4 and 1Thessalonians. For we aren't
the body of Jesus thru C-->J, but the body of Christ thru J-->C.
Why? Perhaps the
biblical "allegory",
also notably a triple "mystery" (Col 2:2), wouldn't be much of a
"mystery" ("of God, and of the Father, and of Christ") if it didn't
have
twists for players
(playing
such a "learning"
game: Rom 15:4),
nor if it wasn't much of a challenge, such as going
beyond even a narrow way; which notably only "leadeth unto life", and
only by "go on to perfection", to a "more excellent way" of
three ways:
broad, narrow, more excellent: "charity". For by a "law"
of
"love"(God): "thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself" many stop
at the narrow way, stop at being children
of God, and risk having a
latter end worse(greater damnation)
by draw back to OT LAW of LAW
<-- Law, and vengeance is mine saith the LAW to the Law. The 2nd
is
"another law",
witch produces "all manner of concupiscence",
makes
a man "wretched",
as noted by Paul in Romans 7.
Jesus notes the "second" (law) is "like the first" (law) in Matthew
22:36-40 law law;
So it reasons that the 2nd (law) of Romans 8:2 law vs law
is like the first (law: sin and death); Not to mention such law vs law
is as loser vs loser: "divided against itself": falls to desolation.
Biblical Surnames of Jesus and
Christ of Christ Jesus vs
Jesus Christ:
The Fulness of "Christ" (of Jesus --> Christ) is
"peace" (not divided);
The Fulness of "Jesus" (of "Christ --> Jesus") is "division" (not
peace).
Is it important? Perhaps very important, when considering that
"peace with God", becoming "alive unto God", "eternal life", and God
given
"victory" over sin
and death (dead end) are notably all through "Jesus Christ". Paul (his
witness
unto all men) is an apostle of "Jesus
Christ", and by the
will of God. Paul speaks of both Christ Jesus and Jesus Christ, but
always clarifies he is an apostle of Jesus Christ speaking to Christ
Jesus people, as if a man to children; a man who put away childish
things (laws).
The Holy Spirit (not Ghost)
has prompted me to 'broach' a 'sensitive' topic. I do it reluctantly,
not yet
having finished my own biblical analysis
on the
subject of "Jesus" vs "Christ" as biblical
surnames of
"Christ Jesus" vs "Jesus Christ"; Let alone "ye
shall die" via the "Christ" of "Christ Jesus" (Lord of the dead)
and
"ye shall live" via the "Christ" of "Jesus Christ" (Lord of the
living). So please bare with me as I dare to compare "Christ
Jesus" and "Jesus Christ", one perhaps being mirrorly the reverse
of
the other, and worthy of much more study.
Biblically,
becoming "alive unto God" is through
"Jesus->Christ".
("through":
in one
side [Jesus] and out the other [Christ], as through the door, way, to
eternal life)
Even after more
actual Bible study
than most peers, I find it difficult to get my head (Christ:
the
head of every man) around such, since it seems to me one Lord,
both of the living + dead, is an oxyMORON with a BAD ending; Especially
if Jesus of
Jesus Christ said
God is not the God of the dead, but only of the living (Mt
22:32; Mk
12:27; Lk 20:38). Hence a Lord of both living and
dead is not one with the living God of the living, but perhaps a Lord
of the living dead (dblemindead),
perhaps them
in Christ Jesus who
haven't yet realized that both life + death = a dead end, nor yet
discerned "both good + evil"
ends badly, nor the law imputes sin and
death unto all (Rom 5:13,14; 1Cor 15:22; Jam 1;15). I'll leave such a
topic wide open to forum discussion,
until it is fully proven.
Biblically,
"eternal life" is through
"Jesus-->Christ" (not Christ Jesus).
Such allegoric things also have allegoric prefixes such as "that Jesus
Christ is come" (as the true of false/true spirits:
1Jn 4 we should try) and allegoric suffixes such as Jesus
Christ "of
Nazareth"... which doesn't necessarily make "Jesus Christ" a Nazarite (religious
fanatic), but rather a Nazarene (from Nazareth).
Yet perhaps "JESUS" OF NAZARETH: KING OF THE JEWS is allegorical for LAW; in the allegorical
sense if such an all inclusive one died, then were all dead, by law;
witch
imputes sin to all: none righteous. Thereby law a sting to all: as in
Adam all
die. And as if all dead, then it's extinction (total
"destruction", not be).
1Cor
15:56 The
strength of sin:
law,
and the sting of such (law
imputed) sin:
death.
2Cor 3:7 thereby law is the ministration of death
And to say "can there any good thing come out of Nazareth" is kinda
like
saying can any good thing come from Nigeria, and because there are so
many
Nigerian 411 email scams on the net, including lawyers,
bankers, and gov't officials, that it makes a person (who
hasn't
been to Nigeria) "wonder" if there is one
honest person in all of Nigeria... or in all of law law
America these
days.
It always remains a "mystery" until "the time" the Lord "come",
and bring to light
(awareness,
understanding, revelation)
the hidden things
of darkness (ignorance).
So we are exhorted: "judge nothing before the time..." (1Cor 4:5). We
are also promised a full monty: "for there is nothing covered that
shall not be revealed, nor hidden that shall not be made known" (Mt
10:26; Mk 4:22; Lk 8:17; 12:2); and Luke "had perfect understanding of
all things from the very first" (Lk 1:3).
But hey, I think it's Revelation
(Disclosure) time, especially beyond 2,000AD, the time for
Uncovering cover ups and revealing everything previously hidden
by raising "us" up "in"
the third day (Hos 6:2), which
is not another millennium, but rather the "third day" [light]
is
also the seventh day (in Jn 1 & 2 if counting, and
evidently counting counts: let only those who have understanding count
in Rev 13). Selah.
And the "seventh day" has no mention at all of both "evening and
morning", only of God ended blessed and
"sanctified" the seventh day, then God rested; Almost allegorically as
if God rested his case: law vs grace, with grace to you all, knowing you can't
have any true rest [peace] with in-laws around. Selah.
Paul The Apostle (of
"Jesus Christ") uses
both "Christ Jesus" and "Jesus Christ" in his writings,
also both "Jesus" and "Christ"; For although he says he
is to be accounted a minister of "Christ", he also reveals (as
revelator of both this and that: 1Cor 7:7, even revelator of both revelations: John
and Jesus Christ) that he is a "faithful steward
of the mysteries of God" (1Cor 4:1,2), and has his "ways" (plural),
"which be in Christ", both this way and that way, as he teaches every
where in
every church... yet perhaps as a comparative teaching method. He also
mentions he'd first begotten many childish
and "carnal" folk such as "them"
who are sanctified in "Christ Jesus" (1Cor 1:2), such
"sons" (plural), and in "Christ
Jesus", as the
division-all Corinthians. And then he exhorts such carnal
christians to all speak
"the same" (Jesus Christ "the same": Heb 13:8) things.
The
grace of our Lord "Jesus Christ" with you all. Amen.
(Rev 22:21)
But Paul also seems to clarify such was not to make any wrong, but
rather to make all aware,
thereby make all right. For it is awareness, the "know"-ing of the truth, the
understanding (which is knowledge
of "the" holy, of holys), by which the God of all grace makes
a "you" (never
err) of "ye" (do alway err); Thereby making
"you" (all inclusive oneness; KofG is within "you")
free (of ever adding "law worketh wrath" to "grace is
sufficient" [no law req'd], thereby condemning yourself to death; since
law a ministration of condemnation and death, the strength of sin
having a "sting": death).
For it seems mention of Christ of "Christ Jesus" (Acts 19 -
1Pet 5) occurs in connection with sin imputation
(Eg:
1Tim 1:15). But with Jesus of "Jesus Christ", it's
only those who sit in Moses' seat (judgment-all law) who are told "Woe" (Stop
it) many times in Mt 23 & Lk 11. And when it comes to
mention of any "great
tribulation" of law, Jesus of JC gives such no place at all
in Mt 24:21...
remembering Matthew begins with "Jesus Christ" and ends with "lo, I am
with you alway, unto the end of the world.
Amen". Lots of twists to the "mystery", requiring "take heed" to all
the
"allegory" clues, lest many deceive you.
And when it comes to both the beginning and end of Pauline epistles,
such a Unique Pauline
Epistles Format: his holy kiss
greet-ing and salute-ation of pure grace, the peace thereof
(no dispute: no mediation, ransom, or
bloody sacrifice
req'd), the greeting is always grace unto you from God our Father,
and (then) peace from "Jesus Christ". The conclusion is the grace of
our Lord "Jesus Christ" with
"you all" (all the KofG within "you") which begins with
"you".
But concerning mediation it's the man "Christ Jesus" and "Jesus"
thereof
mediator, allegorically denoting if Christ (grace) crucified and Jesus
(law) risen, it leaves men in a state of dispute with God rather than
one with God. Selah.
I've probably lost many readers who are saying what(?), pls
speak english(!), not allegoric. Many others
are probably sow off ended by me even broaching the
subject of "their" legalistic "Jesus" of their dyslexic "Christ Jesus",
they
haven't made it to the evidential part, thinking me a heretic
who's
punishment for blasphemy should be the lashes of Mel
Gibson's bloody Passion movie. Yet it may interest all such like
having passion for sacrifice and bloodshed, to note "Christ
Jesus" does not occur in any
of the four gospels. Thank God.
Let me broach the subject of "Christ Jesus" vs "Jesus Christ" by
quoting Paul: "according
to the grace of God which is
given me, as a wise masterbuilder,
I
have laid the
foundation... which is Jesus
Christ".
"other foundation can no
man lay than that is laid,
which is Jesus Christ."
Paul's exhortation
is:
"let every man take heed how
he buildeth thereupon", for it'll be
revealed, made manifest, even declared, what sort it is: this or that. A
current example of fire trying a man's work, burning whatever
does not abide with Christ, is the work of Cardinal Law (of Boston),
who suffered loss, but is saved, as by
fire. Yet what if such "saved" is the sort them all saved out of Egypt
had: "saved and destroyed
after" (Jude 1:5)? It then gets very important to give more earnest
heed
what foundation we build on, and also what we build thereon.
Furthermore let me note that learned
Bible translators
SHOUTED a HINT
in their Epistle
Dedicatory that their three wishes of Grace, Mercy,
and Peace for the princely king and kingdom thereof (which is
allegorically as five
in one hse divided) would be granted through JESUS
CHRIST (Christ thereof the end of the law).
Let me also note: "peace with God" is through "Jesus Christ", as are
becoming "alive unto God" and "eternal life" notably through
"Jesus Christ"; not to mention God given victory to "us" (over
sin and
death) is through
Jesus ->Christ. That "Christ" the "end" thereof such allegoric
Begin -->End, is no
dead end.
Mention of "law" doesn't even occur in Revelation at all, and perhaps
because it mentions "Jesus Christ" in both the first and the last
verses. Go figure.
Let's get to the facts. The New Testament, which notably opens
with the
"generation" of "Jesus Christ" (in comparison to
the "generations" of Adam), both begins (Mt 1:1)
and ends (Rev 22:21) with "Jesus Christ"; Whereas
"Christ Jesus" is only found from Acts 19 to 1Peter 5 (and
notably not in any of the four gospels). The accounting: "Jesus
Christ": 196 times; "Christ Jesus":
57 times. Why?
In Romans, first canonized of Pauline epistles,
the accounting is: "Jesus
Christ" occurs 27 times; "Christ Jesus": 6 times. Even more
revealing is "Christ" alone occurs 35 times; but "Jesus" alone only 5
times. I wonder why?
Biblically, remembering such things are an allegory, first mention
of a thing is usually quite revealing with respect to an allegoric
definition or allegoric clue about such. For example: first mention of
"Amen" reveals it was a dblemindead "Amen, amen" to being both blessed
+ cursed in Numbers. Such blessed + cursed = accursed, a bad end "that
God" (who's all bless, no curse at all
[bless, and curse not], even the better one of
twain blesseds)
will not have.
First mention of "Christ Jesus" (Acts 19:4) reveals
it's accompanied by this question "said Paul", mirrorly the reverse of
Paul said, as CJ is mirrorly the reverse of JC, as "hath God" is
mirrorly the reverse of "God hath", as "am I" is mirrorly the reverse
of "I am". It's an allegory! It's also a mystery to be solved "in
time", since there is neither mystery nor time for such in eternity.
With respect to Paul's apostle ship and stewardship it's accompanied
only by mention of "Jesus Christ". Yet with mention of "our Lord" there
are three occurrences of "Christ Jesus", whereas all others are of
"Jesus Christ". Some might say these are small details clouding the
bigger issue of salvation; but I find there is no insignificant details
in the writings of masterbuilder Paul unless he makes specific mention
it's his personal opinion, and not the Lord's. In the same manner as
Jesus mentions every jot and tiddle of the law, Paul mentions twice, to
"carnal" Corinthians and "bewitched" Galatians, that "a little leaven
leaveneth the whole lump". If we don't get it all right, then it's all
left (behind). For there is no
respect of persons
with God (only against God). Selah.
Perhaps Jesus, of Jesus Christ,
being born under the law, is allegoric
for law of LAWED Grace, the allegory for LORD God. Perhaps he
reconciled all unto himself as
all being
unrighteous under law; then
took such a reconciled all to the cross, whereafter Christ, of Jesus
Christ, is risen and seated at the right hand of God as what's right
with God: the end of the law. For the law made all sinners: "none
righteous, no, not one".
To wit, that
God (of
this/that Gods,
or one God divided) was in Christ (of Jesus Christ)
reconciling the world unto himself (all grace and no
law at all),
not imputing their trespasses (no law = no sin imputed: Rom
4:15; 5:13) unto them (2Cor 5:19).
With respect to mediator, between
God and men (allegory:
Grace and grace + law), what God
will have is all men (plural of man kind) saved
"and"
aware what they're saved from: law. With respect
to mediator, a
mediator is not of one, but of
twain having a dispute. But as it
also allegorically notes: God "is" one (onefold, not twofold;
grace, not grace + law). God is one slice,
not two; and when it
comes to one slice only, such has to be rightly divided, to come out
all
right.
Speaking of God is one, when all are one thing only: the "only" wise God
(of wise and foolish Gods),
the
"only" true God (of false and true spirits), like
God and
Son of God (Jesus Christ) with
power (gospel)
are "one" (grace), then there is no need for
mediation nor sacrifice. For a mediator is only required when
there's a dispute... HELLO, which is why Paul said we should all speak
"the same" (JC is "the same": Heb 13:8) things (talking
to
childish division-all Corinthians).
For if we
all gave no place to devilish law, sin and death wouldn't even be an
issue.
if
we all gave no place to devilish law, sin and death wouldn't be an issue
[no mediation required when there is no dispute; no law, no ultimate
sacrifice]
And with respect to mediator, between
God and men, such is notably
"Christ Jesus", almost allegorically as if such were enmity to God (grace)
and His Christ (end of the law) being one... tricky
wording. And, as noted in Heb 12, "Jesus" is mediator of the new
covenant; which is also the first name (not the surname) of
Jesus Christ on
the cross. And he (God our Saviour) "taketh away" the
first (Jesus), that he may "establish"
the second (Christ). Selah.
To all Passion
of the Christ movie lovers: Go learn
getting carried away is baby-lonish. Then come to repentance, so none
perish (all live happy ever after).
It's like a good mystery with twists, and you have to take heed, give
more earnest heed to what's said, to all the allegory clues. Or as Paul
allegorically
says in Eph 5: "this" is a "great" mystery, but I speak of that, which
is greater: "Christ and the church" being one spirit (not one
flesh; grace, not law). For there is a bridal name change,
surname change, from Adam to Christ, allegorically from them to us,
flesh to
spirit, great to greater, soul to spirit; all such being from law
to
grace (from faith to faith, and from glory to glory), dead
to alive.
It's an allegory
with a moral, the moral being "grace is sufficient" (no law
req'd). For of this and that Gods,
allegorically law and grace, "that God" (grace)
was in "Christ" (the end of the law) reconciling the world unto
himself, not imputing their trespasses (not using any law to
impute any sin to anyone, since law imputes sin unto all, which kills
all,
which is extinction). More specifically, for clarity, that God
was in Christ [the end of the law]
of Jesus Christ, not Christ [crucified]
of Christ Jesus. For such would go against the will of God: I will have
mercy, not sacrifice. And to say Jesus is Lord, and Lord of all, is
only done via the Holy "Ghost" (Dead). But as it is
written: God [is] a Spirit (not a Ghost; alive,
not dead). It's an allegory.
To be continued, as an ongoing study, fully open to discussion
and scrutiny, until
it is fully proven ["evangelist, make full proof of
thy ministry"; and "prove all things"] which is witch of all this/that; For to
me, both that + this, both good + evil, both grace + law, both life +
death, make an oxyMORON with a BAD end; Perhaps why(?) the Hebrews (plural:
allegorically the dblemindead)
are exhorted to "discern [avoid] both
good + evil", for both ends badly, and for all. And so the conclusion
of Paul to the Hebrews is "Grace with you all. Amen". And a
singular "Amen" to "that" (of all this/that) is what
makes you all one thing: holy.
We are also exhorted [as Paul exhorted Timothy] to "turn away" from
"such" like, who have zeal, but lack knowledge of "the" holy
(which is "understanding"). Solomon said to get it: understanding, and
even clarified what sort of understanding to get, by saying when she
(understanding) is "embraced", it results in
thy head [Christ] being crowned with "grace" glory
(Prov 4).
For if grace "is", and law "added", then the only plausible combination
of twain is grace + law (added), which is as life +
death (added),
witch is evidently a dead end for all
are one and of one;
which the only wise
God, the only true God, the "living" God of the "living", that God: all
light and no darkness at all, the God of all grace, His
Grace, and His immutable
will, will simply not have...
not then, not now, not ever. For there is no shadow of turning in that
God, none, and His Son: Jesus Christ is "the same" yesterday,
to day, and for ever.
So,
let us all probate
the
will of God to know, be
100% certain, and thereby have better blessed
assurance, and evidential
seeing faith (instead
of blind faith in law; which is "not of faith": Gal 3:12, and thereby
such is sin: Rom 14:23); "now" faith, having "substance" and
"evidence": evidence that the Son "of God", and the Son of God "with
power" [gospel: Rom 1:16], is "Jesus Christ"... who
said:
"I am [grace] not
come to destroy [law],
but to full fill [grace]"
(allegory: only grace full fills, for law is limited, to
not all: not full filling)
Let us
learn God sent not His Son to
condemn (law)
the world (Jn 3:17); No!
Not "this"
(Jn
3:19); But rather "that": the world (all
men) through
him might be saved (Jn 3:15). That's all saved AND all aware
what they're saved from... lest any ever again get carried away, draw
back, or turn back, and get bewitched. For if any do, it add-verse-ly
affects brethren all one, and all of one (Heb 2);
namely brethren all of "Christ" of "Jesus Christ", who is one with God
is one.
And it seems "many" (Mt 7:13; 24:5) priests, pastors,
internet and political "ministers", even many Prime "Ministers", even
many grandparents, parents, and teachers,
are sadly not yet aware of
what(?) they're all saved from; or that all's well that ends well when
and where his angel
plays the last
trump it:
"The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ with you all. Amen."
|
