Which is Witch: Jesus Christ vs Christ Jesus

What Foundation is laid: This or That ?

"Christ Jesus" or "Jesus Christ"
(Acts 19 - 1Peter 5) (Matthew 1 - Rev 22)

"other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ"

Peace with God is through Jesus Christ.
Reverse: Christ Jesus, is reverse of peace: "division".

Grace(not law) unto you, and peace(not division),
from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ

Biblical Comparison: "Christ Jesus" (mirrorly the reverse of "Jesus Christ") does not occur in any of the four gospel accounts, nor in Revelation, nor in any of the conclusions of any Pauline Epistles. Christ Jesus does occur 57 times from Acts 19 to 1Peter 5 compared to "Jesus Christ" occurs 196 times from Matthew 1 to Revelation 22 in the New Testament.

Jesus -> Christ "edifies" (builds up) to Christ: "the end of the law for righteousness";
Christ -> Jesus "puffeth up" to Jesus: righteousness of left/right Son of Man law law.
(all who will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer; And suffer by 2nd law of law law)

Why? Perhaps the biblical "allegory", also notably a triple "mystery" (Col 2:2), wouldn't be much of a "mystery" ("of God, and of the Father, and of Christ") if it didn't have twists for players (playing such a "learning" game: Rom 15:4), nor if it wasn't much of a challenge, such as going beyond even a narrow way; which notably only "leadeth unto life", and only by "go on to perfection", to a "more excellent way" of three ways: broad, narrow, more excellent: "charity". For by a 'law' of "love"(God): "thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself" many stop at the narrow way, stop at being children of God, and risk having a latter end worse via draw back to law due to law <- law. The 2nd is "another law", witch produces "all manner of concupiscence", and makes a man "wretched", as noted by Paul in Romans 7. Jesus notes a "second" (law) is "like the first" (law) in Matthew 22:36-40 law law; So then also a 2nd of Rom 8:2 law law.

Biblical Surnames of Jesus and Christ of Jesus Christ vs Christ Jesus:
Fulness of "Christ" (of "Jesus -> Christ") is "peace" (not "division");
Fulness of "Jesus" (of "Christ -> Jesus") is "division" (and not peace).

Is it important? Perhaps very important, when considering that "peace with God", becoming "alive unto God", "eternal life", and God given "victory" over sin and death (dead end) are notably all through "Jesus Christ". Paul (his witness unto all men) is an apostle of "Jesus Christ", and by the will of God.

The Holy Spirit (not Ghost) has prompted me to 'broach' a 'sensitive' topic. I do it reluctantly, not yet having finished my own biblical analysis on the subject of "Jesus" vs "Christ" as biblical surnames of "Christ Jesus" vs "Jesus Christ"; Let alone "ye shall die" via the "Christ" of "Christ Jesus" (Lord of the dead) and "ye shall live" via the "Christ" of "Jesus Christ" (Lord of the living). So please bare with me as I dare to compare "Christ Jesus" and "Jesus Christ", one perhaps being mirrorly the reverse of the other, and worthy of much more study.

Biblically, becoming "alive unto God" is through "Jesus->Christ".
("through": in one side [Jesus] and out the other [Christ], as through the door, way, to eternal life)

Even after more actual Bible study than most peers, I find it difficult to get my head (Christ: the head of every man) around such, since it seems to me one Lord, both of the living + dead, is an oxyMORON with a BAD ending; Especially if Jesus of Jesus Christ said God is not the God of the dead, but only of the living (Mt 22:32; Mk 12:27; Lk 20:38). Hence a Lord of both living and dead is not one with the living God of the living, but perhaps a Lord of the living dead (dblemindead), perhaps them in Christ Jesus who haven't yet realized that both life + death = a dead end, nor yet discerned "both good + evil" ends badly, nor the law imputes sin and death unto all (Rom 5:13,14; 1Cor 15:22; Jam 1;15). I'll leave such a topic wide open to forum discussion, until it is fully proven.

Biblically, "eternal life" is through "Jesus->Christ" (not Christ Jesus).

Such allegoric things also have allegoric prefixes such as "that Jesus Christ is come" (as the true of false/true spirits: 1Jn 4 we should try) and allegoric suffixes such as Jesus Christ "of Nazareth"... which doesn't necessarily make "Jesus Christ" a Nazarite (religious fanatic), but rather a Nazarene (from Nazareth). Yet perhaps "JESUS" OF NAZARETH: KING OF THE JEWS is allegorical for LAW; in the allegorical sense if such an all inclusive one died, then were all dead, by law; witch imputes sin to all: none righteous. Thereby law a sting to all: as in Adam all die. And as if all dead, then it's extinction (total "destruction", not be).

The strength of sin: law, and the "sting" of sin (law imputes): death.

And to say "can there any good thing come out of Nazareth" is kinda like saying can any good thing come from Nigeria, and because there are so many Nigerian 411 email scams on the net, including lawyers, bankers, and gov't officials, that it makes a person (who hasn't been to Nigeria) "wonder" if there is one honest person in all of Nigeria... or in all of law law America these days.

It always remains a "mystery" until "the time" the Lord "come", and bring to light (awareness, understanding, revelation) the hidden things of darkness (ignorance). So we are exhorted: "judge nothing before the time..." (1Cor 4:5). We are also promised a full monty: "for there is nothing covered that shall not be revealed, nor hidden that shall not be made known" (Mt 10:26; Mk 4:22; Lk 8:17; 12:2); and Luke "had perfect understanding of all things from the very first" (Lk 1:3).

But hey, I think it's Revelation (Disclosure) time, especially beyond 2,000AD, the time for Uncovering cover ups and revealing everything previously hidden by raising "us" up "in" the third day (Hos 6:2), which is not another millennium, but rather the "third day" [light] is also the seventh day (in Jn 1 & 2 if counting, and evidently counting counts: let only those who have understanding count in Rev 13). Selah.

And the "seventh day" has no mention at all of both "evening and morning", only of God ended blessed and "sanctified" the seventh day, then God rested; Almost allegorically as if God rested his case: law vs grace, with grace to you all, knowing you can't have any true rest [peace] with in-laws around. Selah.

the "grace" of God is given "you" by "Jesus Christ" (1Cor 1:4)

Paul The Apostle (of "Jesus Christ") uses both "Christ Jesus" and "Jesus Christ" in his writings, also both "Jesus" and "Christ"; For although he says he is to be accounted a minister of "Christ", he also reveals (as revelator of both this and that: 1Cor 7:7, even revelator of both revelations: John and Jesus Christ) that he is a "faithful steward of the mysteries of God" (1Cor 4:1,2), and has his "ways" (plural), "which be in Christ", both this way and that way, as he teaches every where in every church... yet perhaps as a comparative teaching method. He also mentions he'd first begotten many childish and "carnal" folk such as "them" who are sanctified in "Christ Jesus" (1Cor 1:2), such "sons" (plural), and in "Christ Jesus", as the division-all Corinthians. And then he exhorts such carnal christians to all speak "the same" (Jesus Christ "the same": Heb 13:8) things.

The grace of our Lord "Jesus Christ" with you all. Amen. (Rev 22:21)

But Paul also seems to clarify such was not to make any wrong, but rather to make all aware, thereby make all right. For it is awareness, the "know"-ing of the truth, the understanding (which is knowledge of "the" holy, of holys), by which the God of all grace makes a "you" (never err) of "ye" (do alway err); Thereby making "you" (all inclusive oneness; KofG is within "you") free (of ever adding "law worketh wrath" to "grace is sufficient" [no law req'd], thereby condemning yourself to death; since law a ministration of condemnation and death, the strength of sin having a "sting": death).

For it seems mention of Christ of "Christ Jesus" (Acts 19 - 1Pet 5) occurs in connection with sin imputation (Eg: 1Tim 1:15). But with Jesus of "Jesus Christ", it's only those who sit in Moses' seat (judgment-all law) who are told "Woe" (Stop it) many times in Mt 23 & Lk 11. And when it comes to mention of any "great tribulation" of law, Jesus of JC gives such no place at all in Mt 24:21... remembering Matthew begins with "Jesus Christ" and ends with "lo, I am with you alway, unto the end of the world. Amen". Lots of twists to the "mystery", requiring "take heed" to all the "allegory" clues, lest many deceive you.

And when it comes to both the beginning and end of Pauline epistles, such a Unique Pauline Epistles Format: his holy kiss greet-ing and salute-ation of pure grace, the peace thereof (no dispute: no mediation, ransom, or bloody sacrifice req'd), the greeting is always grace unto you from God our Father, and (then) peace from "Jesus Christ". The conclusion is the grace of our Lord "Jesus Christ" with "you all" (all the KofG within "you") which begins with "you". But concerning mediation it's the man "Christ Jesus" and "Jesus" thereof mediator, allegorically denoting if Christ (grace) crucified and Jesus (law) risen, it leaves men in a state of dispute with God rather than one with God. Selah.

I've probably lost many readers who are saying what(?), pls speak english(!), not allegoric. Many others are probably sow off ended by me even broaching the subject of "their" legalistic "Jesus" of their dislexic "Christ Jesus", they haven't made it to the evidential part, thinking me a heretic who's punishment for blasphemy should be the lashes of Mel Gibson's bloody Passion movie. Yet it may interest all such like having passion for sacrifice and bloodshed, to note "Christ Jesus" does not occur in any of the four gospels. Thank God.

Let me broach the subject of "Christ Jesus" vs "Jesus Christ" by quoting Paul: "according to the grace of God which is given me, as a wise masterbuilder, I have laid the foundation... which is Jesus Christ".

"other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ."

Paul's exhortation is: "let every man take heed how he buildeth thereupon", for it'll be revealed, made manifest, even declared, what sort it is: this or that. A current example of fire trying a man's work, burning whatever does not abide with Christ, is the work of Cardinal Law (of Boston), who suffered loss, but is saved, as by fire. Yet what if such "saved" is the sort them all saved out of Egypt had: "saved and destroyed after" (Jude 5)? It then gets very important to give more earnest heed what foundation we build on, and also what we build thereon.

Furthermore let me note that learned Bible translators SHOUTED a HINT in their Epistle Dedicatory that their three wishes of Grace, Mercy, and Peace for the princely king and kingdom thereof (which is allegorically as five in one hse divided) would be granted through JESUS CHRIST (Christ thereof the end of the law).

Let me also note: "peace with God" is through "Jesus Christ", as are becoming "alive unto God" and "eternal life" notably through "Jesus Christ"; not to mention God given victory to "us" (over sin and death) is through Jesus ->Christ. That "Christ" the "end" thereof such allegoric Begin ->End, is no dead end.

Mention of "law" doesn't even occur in Revelation at all, and perhaps because it mentions "Jesus Christ" in both the first and the last verses. Go figure.

Let's get to the facts. The New Testament, which notably opens with the "generation" of "Jesus Christ" (in comparison to the "generations" of Adam), both begins (Mt 1:1) and ends (Rev 22:21) with "Jesus Christ"; Whereas "Christ Jesus" is only found from Acts 19 to 1Peter 5 (and notably not in any of the four gospels). The accounting: "Jesus Christ": 196 times; "Christ Jesus": 57 times. Why?

In Romans, first canonized of Pauline epistles, the accounting is: "Jesus Christ" occurs 27 times; "Christ Jesus": 6 times. Even more revealing is "Christ" alone occurs 35 times; but "Jesus" alone only 5 times. I wonder why?

Biblically, remembering such things are an allegory, first mention of a thing is usually quite revealing with respect to an allegoric definition or allegoric clue about such. For example: first mention of "Amen" reveals it was a dblemindead "Amen, amen" to being both blessed + cursed in Numbers. Such blessed + cursed = accursed, a bad end "that God" (who's all bless, no curse at all [bless, and curse not], even the better one of twain blesseds) will not have.

First mention of "Christ Jesus" (Acts 19:4) reveals it's accompanied by this question "said Paul", mirrorly the reverse of Paul said, as CJ is mirrorly the reverse of JC, as "hath God" is mirrorly the reverse of "God hath", as "am I" is mirrorly the reverse of "I am". It's an allegory! It's also a mystery to be solved "in time", since there is neither mystery nor time for such in eternity.

With respect to Paul's apostle ship and stewardship it's accompanied only by mention of "Jesus Christ". Yet with mention of "our Lord" there are three occurrences of "Christ Jesus", whereas all others are of "Jesus Christ". Some might say these are small details clouding the bigger issue of salvation; but I find there is no insignificant details in the writings of masterbuilder Paul unless he makes specific mention it's his personal opinion, and not the Lord's. In the same manner as Jesus mentions every jot and tiddle of the law, Paul mentions twice, to "carnal" Corinthians and "bewitched" Galatians, that "a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump". If we don't get it all right, then it's all left (behind). For there is no respect of persons with God (only against God). Selah.

Perhaps Jesus, of Jesus Christ, being born under the law, is allegoric for law of LAWED Grace, the allegory for LORD God. Perhaps he reconciled all unto himself as all being unrighteous under law; then took such a reconciled all to the cross, whereafter Christ, of Jesus Christ, is risen and seated at the right hand of God as what's right with God: the end of the law. For the law made all sinners: "none righteous, no, not one".

To wit, that God (of this/that Gods, or one God divided) was in Christ (of Jesus Christ) reconciling the world unto himself (all grace and no law at all), not imputing their trespasses (no law = no sin imputed: Rom 4:15; 5:13) unto them (2Cor 5:19).

With respect to mediator, between God and men (allegory: Grace and grace + law), what God will have is all men (plural of man kind) saved "and" aware what they're saved from: law. With respect to mediator, a mediator is not of one, but of twain having a dispute. But as it also allegorically notes: God "is" one (onefold, not twofold; grace, not grace + law). God is one slice, not two; and when it comes to one slice only, such has to be rightly divided, to come out all right.

Speaking of God is one, when all are one thing only: the "only" wise God (of wise and foolish Gods), the "only" true God (of false and true spirits), like God and Son of God (Jesus Christ) with power (gospel) are "one" (grace), then there is no need for mediation nor sacrifice. For a mediator is only required when there's a dispute... HELLO, which is why Paul said we should all speak "the same" (JC is "the same": Heb 13:8) things (talking to childish division-all Corinthians). For if we all gave no place to devilish law, sin and death wouldn't even be an issue.

if we all gave no place to devilish law, sin and death wouldn't be an issue
[no mediation required when there is no dispute; no law, no ultimate sacrifice]

And with respect to mediator, between God and men, such is notably "Christ Jesus", almost allegorically as if such were enmity to God (grace) and His Christ (end of the law) being one... tricky wording. And, as noted in Heb 12, "Jesus" is mediator of the new covenant; which is also the first name (not the surname) of Jesus Christ on the cross. And he (God our Saviour) "taketh away" the first (Jesus), that he may "establish" the second (Christ). Selah.

To all Passion of the Christ movie loverrs: Go learn getting carried away is baby-lonish. Then come to repentance, so none perish (all live happy ever after).

It's like a good mystery with twists, and you have to take heed, give more earnest heed to what's said, to all the allegory clues. Or as Paul allegorically says in Eph 5: "this" is a "great" mystery, but I speak of that, which is greater: "Christ and the church" being one spirit (not one flesh; grace, not law). For there is a bridal name change, surname change, from Adam to Christ, allegorically from them to us, flesh to spirit, great to greater, soul to spirit; all such being from law to grace (from faith to faith, and from glory to glory), dead to alive.

It's an allegory with a moral, the moral being "grace is sufficient" (no law req'd). For of this and that Gods, allegorically law and grace, "that God" (grace) was in "Christ" (the end of the law) reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses (not using any law to impute any sin to anyone, since law imputes sin unto all, which kills all, which is extinction). More specifically, for clarity, that God was in Christ [the end of the law] of Jesus Christ, not Christ [crucified] of Christ Jesus. For such would go against the will of God: I will have mercy, not sacrifice. And to say Jesus is Lord, and Lord of all, is only done via the Holy "Ghost" (Dead). But as it is written: God [is] a Spirit (not a Ghost; alive, not dead). It's an allegory.

To be continued, as an ongoing study, fully open to discussion and scrutiny, until it is fully proven ["evangelist, make full proof of thy ministry"; and "prove all things"] which is witch of all this/that; For to me, both that + this, both good + evil, both grace + law, both life + death, make an oxyMORON with a BAD end; Perhaps why(?) the Hebrews (plural: allegorically the dblemindead) are exhorted to "discern [avoid] both good + evil", for both ends badly, and for all. And so the conclusion of Paul to the Hebrews is "Grace with you all. Amen". And a singular "Amen" to "that" (of all this/that) is what makes you all one thing: holy.

We are also exhorted [as Paul exhorted Timothy] to "turn away" from "such" like, who have zeal, but lack knowledge of "the" holy (which is "understanding"). Solomon said to get it: understanding, and even clarified what sort of understanding to get, by saying when she (understanding) is "embraced", it results in thy head [Christ] being crowned with "grace" glory (Prov 4).

For if grace "is", and law "added", then the only plausible combination of twain is grace + law (added), which is as life + death (added), witch is evidently a dead end for all are one and of one; which the only wise God, the only true God, the "living" God of the "living", that God: all light and no darkness at all, the God of all grace, His Grace, and His immutable will, will simply not have... not then, not now, not ever. For there is no shadow of turning in that God, none, and His Son: Jesus Christ is "the same" yesterday, to day, and for ever.

So, let us all probate the will of God to know, be 100% certain, and thereby have better blessed assurance, and evidential seeing faith (instead of blind faith in law; which is "not of faith": Gal 3:12, and thereby such is sin: Rom 14:23); "now" faith, having "substance" and "evidence": evidence that the Son "of God", and the Son of God "with power" [gospel: Rom 1:16], is "Jesus Christ"... who said:

"I am [grace] not come to destroy [law], but to full fill [grace]"
(allegory: only grace full fills, for law is limited, to not all: not full filling)

Let us learn God sent not His Son to condemn (law) the world (Jn 3:17); No! Not "this" (Jn 3:19); But rather "that": the world (all men) through him might be saved (Jn 3:15). That's all saved AND all aware what they're saved from... lest any ever again get carried away, draw back, or turn back, and get bewitched. For if any do, it add-verse-ly affects brethren all one, and all of one (Heb 2); namely brethren all of "Christ" of "Jesus Christ", who is one with God is one.

And it seems "many" (Mt 7:13; 24:5) priests, pastors, internet and political "ministers", even many Prime "Ministers", even many grandparents, parents, and teachers, are sadly not yet aware of what(?) they're all saved from; or that all's well that ends well when and where his angel plays the last trump it:

"The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ with you all. Amen."

Which is Witch? Jesus Christ -vs- Christ Jesus

Jesus Christ is not Christ Jesus

Which is Witch: Jesus Christ vs Christ Jesus