- the foundation of repentance from dead works
                            - and of faith toward God
                            - Of the doctrine of baptisms
                            - and of laying on of hands
                            - and of resurrection of the dead
                            - and of eternal judgment
     Why LEAVE? BECAUSE there are no dead to even resurrect in the God of the living;
     So dare to compare God of the dead: Law to God of the living: Grace, then LEAVE
     the God who speaks of both salvation and destruction for the God of the living only.
     It's as if leaving the double-minded left/right division on high for what's higher of high/higher.
     For even when right of law/grace it is still division, not peace; Still part-iality, not perfect-ion.
     1Corinthians 13:10,11: when perfect-ion (man) comes, part-iality (childish things) done away.
     Be reconciled to death, to have resurrections from graves, to continue sides wars, is child-ish.
     James 3 notes this other wise is not pure wisdom from above, but is earthy, sensual, devil-ish.
     So Paul also says in Hebrews 6:3: And this (leave high for higher) we will do if God permit.
     Until willing to put away childish things of child/man, we remain a childish-adult: oxy-moron,
     cannot inherit the kingdom of God: isn't right of left/right division, but is higher of high/higher.
     So allegorically it's until we are willing to put away all law of law/grace, we'll be lawed-grace,
     and lawed-grace does not get exhorted to go up higher, as higher is pure grace, is "harmless".
    To offer sacrifice (is by the law) unto higher God would be as if offering death unto eternal life.
    Allegorically it's as leave both Jesus x2 --> Christ x2 to go on unto God is one can't lie nor die.
    Reconciling the world unto that God is neither to two Sons Jesus nor to false/true Christs arise.
    For our new high priest, of old/new high priests, went higher to appear unto that God for us all.
    It's as leave plural spake<--God-->spoke on high for God in heaven: "higher than the heavens".
    Which is to say taste not the hook on the line: In the beginning God created heaven and earth;
    For eternal Grace has neither beginning nor an end, neither a beginning of days nor end of life,
    and especially no beginning of sorrows (laws) in God upbraideth not: neither bites nor smites.
    So it's as leaving six days for the seventh day has no mention of such even-ing and mourn-ing.   


Reference: Two Resurrections of Two Sons Jesus in verily verily John 5:25-29
- the resurrection of life ... for the good dead
- the resurrection of damnation ... for the evil dead
If both are from graves, then it's a grave subject of law law to avoid,
similar to an Olivet Discourse that's given from seated in a graveyard,
and over "against" a temple firstly doomed by such dooming law law.

Problem #1 with resurrection of the dead:
Resurrection of the dead is double-minded: both good and evil: ends badly.
Eg: having resurrection of damnation (law: the abomination of desolation) only
continues the damnation process, and the sides war, resulting in "war in heaven":
Michael vs Dragon: angels vs angels: is divided against itself: "falls" to desolation.
A children vs children or a servants vs servants war in heaven is as if childish folly,
for of children of the wicked vs children of the kingdom also get "cast out": Mt 8:12.
By the law it's Damned if you Do-teronomy and also Damned if you Don't-eronomy.
Sacrifice is by the law. What's evident is no man is justified by the law in God's sight,
and only child/man can inherit the kingdom of God doesn't have L/R sides to have wars.
So having a sacrifice war: my sacrifice is better than your sacrifice, is as if childish folly.
War is friend only to the under-taker: law, even if we are not under law but under grace.
A heart established "with" grace is no longer "under" grace, but seated with Christ above.


Problem #2 with resurrection of the dead:
Resurrection of the dead has partiality. There's no partiality with God. Partiality is not good.
The Son of God also has no partiality; And even the Herodians knew that much: Matthew 22:16.
So perhaps we should dare compare Son of man vs Son of God and Son of God vs Son of God.
Son of man is not Son of God. Son of God on high has partiality, is not good, but good and evil.
So if we have partiality, such as having a personal Saviour, we can't be exhorted to go up higher.
Reconciling the world is all, not some, nor many, nor few. It's a globe-all matter, but not two alls.
As we become more globe-all minded, we begin to see man kind as one, all in this matter together.
Many say one died for all; But "we thus judge if one died for all, then were all dead" = extinction.
All dead: extinction isn't our goal. All live: salvation is our goal. Furthermore it's "eternal salvation".
For if any perish, then it becomes all perish by law. So we go on, unto none perish, lest all perish.


Problem #3 with resurrection of the dead:
Resurrection of the dead reconciles people unto sin and death. God will have neither.
Inexcusable law also imputes unpardonable sin: eternal damnation: hath never forgiveness.
Blaspheme the Ghost (Law) hath never forgiveness, neither in this world nor in the to come.
In 1Corinthians 15:56 the sting of law imputed sin is death. In Revelation 6:8 hell follows death.
So give any place at all to any law at all gives place to sin, gives place to death, followed by hell.
Only law imputes sin: Romans 4:15 and Romans 5:13. The law is both good and evil: ends badly,
reconciling people to sin and death based on resurrection of the dead, but hell is what follows death.
So in Revelation 1:18 living law that was dead promises people it has the keys of hell and death; But what unjust law uses keys of hell and death for is to lock the door after victims are suckered in.
So let's hear both the questions and answers that are asked and answered in 1Corinthians 15:55,56:
- Question: O death, where [is] thy sting? Answer: The sting of death is (in the law imputes) sin.
- Question: O grave, where [is] thy victory? Answer: The strength (strong man) of sin [is] the law.
So law is not only root source of sin and death followed by hell, but the strong man of such house.
So we're told to first bind the strong man: law, if we want to spoil a Mosaic house of sin and death.
Seven sons of Sceva didn't, so when it came to a fight of faith it was I fought the law and law won.
So Pauline Epistles quarantine sandwich a discussion of deadly law with opening and closing grace.
Paul tells us to greet and salute one another with a holy kiss whenever having sparring discussion. But if the law is holy, Paul's holy kiss can be law, so converted Peter says make it a kiss of charity.


Problem #4 with resurrection of the dead:
Resurrection of the dead is about a God of the dead: Law, is not the God of the living: Grace.
Therefore it's to greatly err to think God is the God of the dead by having resurrection of the dead;
For there are no dead in "the God of living", so obviously no need for any resurrection of the dead.
Eg: Matthew 22:31,32 But as touching the resurrection of the dead, have ye not read that which was spoken unto you by God, saying, I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob? God is not the God of the dead, but of the living. Eg: Mark 12:26,27 And as touching the dead, that they rise: have ye not read in the book of Moses, how in the bush God spake unto him, saying, I [am] the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob? He is not the God of the dead, but the God of the living: ye therefore do greatly err. The point being made is that God is not both grace (life) and law (death), but "the God of all grace". There's neither any ministration of death (law), nor resurrection of the dead in God can't lie or die. So death and resurrection of the dead would be resurrection of a man-made-God is a lie can die, namely Law, heard in Revelation 1:18 saying: I [am] he that liveth, and was dead. A perverted greeting in Revelation 1:4 is from such like: him which is, and which was, and which is to come. Grace is never a was. Law "was, but is not". Law "was" a schoolmaster which failed every student, so when grace and truth came by Jesus Christ this schoolmaster got dismissed: Galatians 3, abolished for being such enmity: Ephesians 2, put away as a child is put off to be a man: 1Cor 13, done away as ministration of condemenation and death: 2Cor 3, nailed for being against us: Col 2, so blotted out to the point what's old, faulty, ready to vanish (Heb 8:13) shall vanish (1Cor 13:8). When we let law (the ministration of death) vanish, then there will be no dead to resurrect.


Problem #5 with resurrection of the dead:
Resurrection of the dead is what we leave to go on unto perfection in Hebrews 6:1-3. For when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away: 1Corinthians 13:10. So when merciful (grace) is come, then what's not merciful (law) shall be done away. We could also say when JC grace is come, then Noahic grace (he found in eyes of the LAW) is to be done away. Childish grace (having partiality) Noah found in LAW didn't save all, but in the end destroyed all. So an example Paul gives in 1Cor 13:11 is when I became a man, I put away childish things (laws). Paul notes "blessedness of man" is "blessed the child/man to whom the Lord will not impute sin": Romans 4:8; For where no law, there is no transgression (Romans 4:15) and when no law, then sin (has a death sting, followed by hell) is not imputed (Romans 5:13). So child/man is as if law/grace:
    - God said: let us make child/man, in accordance with let there be darkness(law)/light(grace)
      In contrast Amos 5:18 says the day of the LORD (LAW) is darkness(law), not light(grace)
    - God's Christ is the head of every child/man; That Christ is the end of the law for rightness
    - Luke 16:16 notes law was childish, and every child/man presseth into the kingdom of God
    - John 3:3 and 3:7 notes born again happens to child/man, in order to see the kingdom of God,
      for man to see the kingdom of God is not right of left/right division, but is higher of high/higher,
      which is to say neither visible nor accessible when children vs children, but for child/man kind.
For a child differeth nothing from a servant. Neither child (servant) nor their lord inherits the KofG. Two Sons Jesus was head of children vs children. One Son Christ is the head of every child/man. Two Sons Jesus spake/spoke of two resurrections, both from graves, for good and evil dead (lost). Luke 15: it's not a prodigal servant (child), but son was lost (dead: law), but is found (alive: grace). One Son Christ spoke of "the resurrection", as the last day (third day) uprising of man kind rising above resurrection of the dead from graves, by reconciling the world (man kind) unto that God, as that God of this/that Gods, that world of this/that worlds, higher of high/higher, cannot lie nor die. When Christ abolished the law (enmity) to be our peace, he became one: new child/man: Eph 2:15. So not one of twain children vs children, but one above twain: one new man of old/new man. The higher calling is be no more children x2, be no more servants x2, and be not highminded x2. When I became grace, I put away laws, is to say: When I became eternal life, I put away deaths. So resurrection(s) of the dead x2 is part, the (dead, lost) part to be done away when perfect comes. Perfect (merciful) speaks of he is not the God of the dead: Law, but the God of the living: Grace. Only Grace quickeneth all things. Law can't quicken all things, only almost all things, a short fall. It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God. What then? Christ is of no effect to you.


Problem #6 with resurrection of the dead:
Resurrection of the dead (lost) is about twain: everlasting punishment/life eternal; And resurrection of damnation the latter of both dead good and evil twain: of life/of damnation. So let us consider the life eternal in Matthew 25:46's left/right division is neither unity of the Spirit nor eternal life. Eternal life isn't life after death, but life void of death. So no resurrection of the dead in eternal life. So we leave twain, even the better of twain, for oneness (allness) that is above and beyond twain. God is one, and a mediator (Jesus, in Sion: heavenly Jerusalem) is not of one (God): Galatians 3, written to bewitched churches still having children vs children and servants vs servants sides wars have side effects to both sides of goats vs sheep division isn't peace nor is their partiality perfection. Perfection is what we go on unto by leaving division & partiality, even if it means leaving churches. Such happens when we leave being driven by the Ghost (Law) to be "led of the Spirit" (Grace); And then ask purpose driven sheeple of purpose driven churches to explain what their purpose is, if still law imputing sin and death followed by hell; Whether it be for the hell of it or for love of $. Either way, of double-minded ways, it's an apocalypse. We've already seen economic apocalypse of Greece isn't going well for many in Eu-rope who are coming to the end of their twisted rope, and economic apocalypse of USA isn't going well for those still advocating rod of iron rule of law ww. God did not send his Son to accuse or condemn (law) the world; no, not this (gospel), but rather that (gospel): through him (through Jesus --> Christ) the world might be saved (graced and truthed). God's grace is not over against any, but with you all: you and all the kingdom of God within you. Through Jesus --> Christ, in that Christ thereof, we encourage all to lay hold on eternal life, by leave both sides of resurrection of the dead to go on unto there are no dead in the God of the living.

                                                        1. light void of darkness, is
                                                        2. grace void of law, is
                                                        3. mercy void of sacrifice, is
                                                        4. peace void of division, is
                                                        5. love void of fear (torment), is
                                                        6. comfort void of discomfort, is
                                                        7. eternal life void of death 

Problem #7 with resurrection of the dead:
Resurrection of the dead is not unto God cannot lie nor die; but unto Law both lies and kills, whether it's the resurrection of life which Lazarus had, but still died afterward by such life + death, or the resurrection of damnation an 'arnion' Lamb has in Revelation, thereby still bites and smites. Due to people singing a LAW-->Law song of the servant Moses and a LAW<--Law song of the arnion Lamb, both to Law: God Almighty, him which is and which was and which is to come, it's wrath to come, not only bite all seven angels of all seven churches, but smite nations with a curse. Such is not only division isn't peace, also partiality isn't perfection, but it's LAW<--Law, and the result of such is vengeance is mine saith the LAW to the Law. As noted in Revelation 1:7, by the resurrection of damnation (law) in Revelation 1:4, it's behold: all kindreds of the earth shall wail. We've already heard much wailing from
- genocide in Ruwanda brought death to many (genocide being worse in last century than first)
- 9/11 brought down two world trade towers full of people to ground zero
- war in Iraq killed many for no reason, after a decade of tariffs first killed many
- a tsunami gave a big wave from Law worketh wrath to many
- war moved into Afghanastan where poppies are grown in flanders field
- Katrina gave a big hurrycane wave from Law worketh wrath
- an earthquake in Haiti killed many
- wild fires, mud slides, droughts, floods, etc are harming many
- a volcano in Iceland stopped air traffic, stranding many
- a flood covers 1/3 of Pakistan
- BC is on fire, and the smoke is seen in the midst of Canada
There are 8 million ways law can be a ministration of death. Prior to being the sting of death,
law's all vanity and vexation of spirit, and evil concupiscence, a piper piping every day to pay.
How much more wailing do you need to hear before you think from the end already written,
where there is no mention of law: sin and death followed by hell, and you all begins with you: